Abstract
This article will describe an approach to planning and assessment that is designed to support an emergent, play-based curriculum while helping teachers make informed instructional decisions. Using assessment that supports curriculum allows early childhood professionals to infuse early learning content standards into meaningful, relevant and connected topics of study. Through a combined effort among teachers, administrators and university faculty, one demonstration school developed a method of integrating and evaluating content standards and developmental skills into an emergent curriculum model. While this remains a work in progress, it does show promise for being an effective way to address state standards while maintaining recommended developmentally appropriate practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, S. M., Baldwin, J., Comingore, J. L., & Smith, D. J. (2006). Emergent curriculum? Standards-based? Project Approach? Authentic assessment?: Making all the pieces fit for a developmentally appropriate approach to curriculum and assessment. Dayton’s Young Child, 2(1), 6–8.
Anderson, K. L., Martin, D. M., & Faszewski, E. E. (2006). Unlocking the power of observations. Science and Children, 44(1), 32–35.
Bagnato, S. J. (2005). The authentic alternative for assessment in early intervention: An emerging evidence-based practice. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(1), 17–22. doi:10.1177/105381510502800102.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Clifford, R. M., Barbarin, O., Chang, F., Early, D., Bryant, D., Howes, C., et al. (2005). What is pre-kindergarten? Characteristics of public pre-kindergarten programs. Applied Developmental Science, 9(3), 126–143. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0903_1.
Dueschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Epstein, A. S., Schweinhart, L. J., & McAdoo, L. (1996). Models of early childhood education. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
Espinosa, L. (2002). High quality preschool: Why we need it and what it looks like. NIEER Policy Briefs 1. http://nieer.org/resources/policybriefs/1.pdf.
Freeman, N., & Brown, M. (2008). An authentic approach to assessing pre-kindergarten programs. Childhood Education, 84(5), 267–273.
Hatch, J. A., & Grieshaber, S. (2002). Child observation and accountability in early childhood education: Perspectives from Australia and the United States. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(4), 227–231. doi:10.1023/A:1015177406713.
Katz, L., & Chard, S. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.
NAEYC & NAECS/SDE. (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8 [Joint position statement]. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2001). Practitioner review: The role of direct observation in the assessment of young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(7), 861–869. doi:10.1017/S002196300100765X.
Peterson, S. M., & French, L. (2008). Supporting young children’s explanations through inquiry science in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 395–408. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.01.003.
Pianta, R., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, D., Clifford, R. M., Early, D., et al. (2005). Features of pre-kindergarten programs, classrooms, and teachers: Do they predict observed classroom quality and child–teacher interactions? Applied Developmental Science, 9(3), 144–159. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0903_2.
Raspa, M. J., McWilliam, R. A., & Ridley, S. M. (2001). Child care quality and children’s engagement. Early Education and Development, 12, 209–224. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1202_3.
Ravanis, K., & Pantidos, P. (2008). Science activities in preschool education: Effective and ineffective activities in a Piagetian theoretical framework for research and development. International Journal of Learning, 15(2), 123–132.
Ryan, S. (2008). Action or reaction: Reflecting on Sally Lubeck’s wisdom to reinvent the field of early education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 6, 69–74. doi:10.1177/1476718X07086602.
Winter, S. M., & Kelley, M. F. (2008). Forty years of school readiness research: What have we learned? Childhood Education, 84(5), 260–266.
Zales, C. R., & Unger, C. S. (2008). The science and literacy framework. Science and Children, 46(3), 42–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldwin, J.L., Adams, S.M. & Kelly, M.K. Science at the Center: An Emergent, Standards-Based, Child-Centered Framework for Early Learners. Early Childhood Educ J 37, 71–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0318-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0318-z