Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Science at the Center: An Emergent, Standards-Based, Child-Centered Framework for Early Learners

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article will describe an approach to planning and assessment that is designed to support an emergent, play-based curriculum while helping teachers make informed instructional decisions. Using assessment that supports curriculum allows early childhood professionals to infuse early learning content standards into meaningful, relevant and connected topics of study. Through a combined effort among teachers, administrators and university faculty, one demonstration school developed a method of integrating and evaluating content standards and developmental skills into an emergent curriculum model. While this remains a work in progress, it does show promise for being an effective way to address state standards while maintaining recommended developmentally appropriate practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, S. M., Baldwin, J., Comingore, J. L., & Smith, D. J. (2006). Emergent curriculum? Standards-based? Project Approach? Authentic assessment?: Making all the pieces fit for a developmentally appropriate approach to curriculum and assessment. Dayton’s Young Child, 2(1), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. L., Martin, D. M., & Faszewski, E. E. (2006). Unlocking the power of observations. Science and Children, 44(1), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnato, S. J. (2005). The authentic alternative for assessment in early intervention: An emerging evidence-based practice. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(1), 17–22. doi:10.1177/105381510502800102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, R. M., Barbarin, O., Chang, F., Early, D., Bryant, D., Howes, C., et al. (2005). What is pre-kindergarten? Characteristics of public pre-kindergarten programs. Applied Developmental Science, 9(3), 126–143. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0903_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dueschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, A. S., Schweinhart, L. J., & McAdoo, L. (1996). Models of early childhood education. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, L. (2002). High quality preschool: Why we need it and what it looks like. NIEER Policy Briefs 1. http://nieer.org/resources/policybriefs/1.pdf.

  • Freeman, N., & Brown, M. (2008). An authentic approach to assessing pre-kindergarten programs. Childhood Education, 84(5), 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. A., & Grieshaber, S. (2002). Child observation and accountability in early childhood education: Perspectives from Australia and the United States. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(4), 227–231. doi:10.1023/A:1015177406713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Chard, S. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAEYC & NAECS/SDE. (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8 [Joint position statement]. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (2001). Practitioner review: The role of direct observation in the assessment of young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(7), 861–869. doi:10.1017/S002196300100765X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. M., & French, L. (2008). Supporting young children’s explanations through inquiry science in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 395–408. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, D., Clifford, R. M., Early, D., et al. (2005). Features of pre-kindergarten programs, classrooms, and teachers: Do they predict observed classroom quality and child–teacher interactions? Applied Developmental Science, 9(3), 144–159. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0903_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raspa, M. J., McWilliam, R. A., & Ridley, S. M. (2001). Child care quality and children’s engagement. Early Education and Development, 12, 209–224. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1202_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravanis, K., & Pantidos, P. (2008). Science activities in preschool education: Effective and ineffective activities in a Piagetian theoretical framework for research and development. International Journal of Learning, 15(2), 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. (2008). Action or reaction: Reflecting on Sally Lubeck’s wisdom to reinvent the field of early education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 6, 69–74. doi:10.1177/1476718X07086602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. M., & Kelley, M. F. (2008). Forty years of school readiness research: What have we learned? Childhood Education, 84(5), 260–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zales, C. R., & Unger, C. S. (2008). The science and literacy framework. Science and Children, 46(3), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joni L. Baldwin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldwin, J.L., Adams, S.M. & Kelly, M.K. Science at the Center: An Emergent, Standards-Based, Child-Centered Framework for Early Learners. Early Childhood Educ J 37, 71–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0318-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0318-z

Keywords

Navigation