Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-conceptualizing Emotion and Motivation to Learn in Classroom Contexts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To better inform and improve classroom teaching and learning, now more than ever before, educational researchers need to effectively and efficiently describe essential components of positive learning environments. In this article, we discuss how our research findings about motivation in classrooms have led to a closer examination of emotions. We describe how motivation theories such as Academic Risk Taking, Flow Theory, and Goal Theory have helped us better understand emotions in our classroom research. Our findings suggest that engaging students in learning requires consistently positive emotional experiences, which contribute to a classroom climate that forms the foundation for teacher–student relationships and interactions necessary for motivation to learn. We conclude that we need to integrate emotion, motivation, and cognition theoretically and methodologically to move our research forward. New theories and methods, even new forms of intellectual discourse, are required. Therefore, we end this article by beginning a discussion of new directions for conceptualizing and researching classrooms in ways that will involve examining the emotions of students and teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The ideas in this paragraph represent an innovative cognitive view of emotion, cognition, and motivation as expressed in an interview with Michael Wapner published in Baars (1986).

  2. “Thin-slicing” is a term used in the sciences to describe a cross-sectional sampling method. Gladwell (2005) has popularly defined it as “the ability of our unconscious to find patterns in situations and behaviors based on a very narrow slice of experience” (p. 23). We use the term to denote a researcher’s ability to determine the most significant constructs within a complex context for understanding and predicting human perceptions and behaviors.

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.) (2000). The role of social context in educational psychology: Substantive and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist (Special edition).

  • Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (2001). Context sensitivity: Activated motivational beliefs, current concerns and emotional arousal. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 17–31). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boler, M. (1999). Feeling Power: Emotions and Education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (1999). Research on motivation in education: Past, present, and future. In T. C. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement: The role of context, vol. 11, (pp. 1–44). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, M. M. (1984). Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist, 19, 108–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, M. M. (1988). Failure tolerance and academic risk-taking in ten- to twelve-year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, M. M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical, and educational considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 111–141). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond freedom and anxiety. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (1989). The dynamics of intrinsic motivation. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Handbook of motivation theory and research, vol. 3, (pp. 45–71). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Decartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Legget, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107, 186–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J., & Kraska, K. (1989). Self-regulation and meta-motivation: Computational mechanisms, development, and assessment. In R. Kanfer, P. Ackerman, & R. Cudek (Eds.), Abilities, motivation, and methodology (pp. 343–368). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991a). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991b). Progress on a cognitive–motivational–relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Scaffolding emotions in classrooms. In P. A. Schultz and R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in Education. Academic Press/Elsevier (in press).

  • Meyer, D. K., Turner, J. C., & Spencer, C. A. (1997). Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in project-based learning. Elementary School Journal, 97, 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., & Maehr, M. (1991). Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97, 315–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J., Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school: Associations with avoidance in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105, 1521–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2, 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, P. A., & Lanehart, S. L. (2002). Introduction: Emotions in education. Educational Psychologist, 37, 67–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D., Salmon, J. M., Givvin, K. B., Kazemi, E., Saxe, G., & MacGyvers, V. L. (1998). The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Applied social research methods series: Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches vol. 46, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106, 1759–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. C., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998a). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 730–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Thorpe, P., & Meyer, D. K. (1998b). Students’ reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 758–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., et al. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Midgley, C., & Patrick, H. (2003). Teacher discourse and students’ affect and achievement-related behaviors in two high mastery/high performance classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 103, 357–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T. (1999) Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation in context Vol. 11, Stamford, Connecticut: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T., Kneisel, L., & Mason, V. (1999). The effect of particular instructional practices on student motivation: An exploration of teachers’ and students’ perceptions. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Volume 11: Motivation in context (pp. 123–158). Stamford, Connecticut: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park, California: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M. (2003). Interrogating teacher identity: Emotion, resistance, and self-formation. Educational Theory, 53, 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lisa Linnenbrink, Susan Nolan, and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and feedback on the revision of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra K. Meyer.

Additional information

An earlier version of this article was originally presented in E. A. Linnenbrink (Chair) Reflections on Emotion Research: The Theoretical Integration of Affect, Motivation, and Cognition. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2005, Montreal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, D.K., Turner, J.C. Re-conceptualizing Emotion and Motivation to Learn in Classroom Contexts. Educ Psychol Rev 18, 377–390 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9032-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9032-1

Keywords

Navigation