Skip to main content
Log in

Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrary to system-controlled multimedia learning environments, hypermedia systems are characterized by a high level of interactivity. This interactivity is referred to as learner control in the respective literature. For several reasons this learner control is seen as a major advantage of hypermedia for learning and instruction. For instance, learner control might increase students’ interest and motivation, facilitate adaptive instruction, or provide affordances for active and constructive information processing. In this paper we analyze the instructional potentials of learner-controlled hypermedia environments as well as possible reasons for the ambiguous results of studies that have aimed at determining the effectiveness of hypermedia learning. According to our analysis, the potential effectiveness of self-controlled learning with hypermedia might be difficult to demonstrate due to (1) usability problems (i.e., disorientation, distraction, cognitive overload), (2) moderating learner characteristics (i.e., prior knowledge, self-regulatory skills, cognitive styles, and attitudes towards learning), (3) a lack of conceptual foundations, and (4) methodological shortcomings of many hypermedia studies. The findings reviewed in this paper and the corresponding claim that hypermedia may be effective only if used in a sensible way are used to derive a couple of guidelines for further research on hypermedia learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2003). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualization for an information age. In A. Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, & S. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 199–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. A. (1998). Transforming text for at-risk readers. In M. M. D. Reinking, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post typographic world (pp. 15–43). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astleitner, H., & Leutner, D. (1995). Learning strategies for unstructured hypermedia—A framework for theory, research, and practice. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcytiene, A. (1999). Exploring individual processes of knowledge construction with hypertext. Instructional Science, 27, 303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannert, M. (2003). Effekte metakognitiver Lernhilfen auf den Wissenserwerb in vernetzten Lernumgebungen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., & Lawless, K. A. (1997). Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45, 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., Young, M. F., & Owen, S. V. (1996). Understanding kiosk navigation: Using log files to capture hypermedia searches. Instructional Science, 24, 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, R. E., & Waugh, M. L. (1995). Cognitive mapping architectures and hypermedia disorientation: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4, 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, R. E., & Waugh, M. L. (1996). The effects of content-structure focusing on learner structural knowledge acquisition, retention, and disorientation in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaufils, A. (2000). Tools and strategies for searching hypermedia environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. (1991). The navigation problem reconsidered. In E. Berk & J. Devlin (Eds.), Hypertext/Hypermedia handbook (pp. 285–297). New York: Intertext Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boechler, P. M., & Dawson, R. W. (2002). Effects of navigation tool information on hypertext navigation behavior: A configural analysis of page-transition data. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and application. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space, the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 87–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D., Rivers, R., & Storrs, G. (1985). Characterizing user navigation through complex data structures. Behavior and Information Technology, 4, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, E., Crawford, S., & Chen, H. (1992). Browsing in hypertext: A cognitive study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 865–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2000). Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 529–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. Y., Fan, J.-P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. Y., & Ford, N. J. (1998). Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia-based learning system: An individual differences approach. Knowledge Organization, 25, 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1996). Looking at technology in context: A framework for understanding technology and education research. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 807–840). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20, 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Rasmussen, K. L., & Bratton-Jeffery, M. F. (1997). Investigating learning strategies generation in a hypermedia environment using qualitative methods. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8, 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, T., & van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on exploratory behaviour and knowledge acquisition in hypertext environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee-Lucas, D. (1996). Effects of overview structure on study strategies and text representations for instructional hypertext. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 73–107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition & Instruction, 13, 431–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, E., & de Jong, T. (1999). The design and evaluation of hypertext structures for supporting design problem solving. Instructional Science, 3–4, 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, P., Gomes, M. J., & Correia, A. P. (1999). Disorientation in hypermedia environments: Mechanisms to support navigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A. (1991). Readers’ models of text structures: The case of academic articles. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 35, 913–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A. (1996). Myths, misconceptions, and an alternative perspective on information usage and the electronic medium. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 25–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005) Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne, R., & Turcotte, S. (1997). Cognitive style and its implications for navigation strategies. In B. du Boulay & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 287–293). Amsterdam: IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. M., & Hardman, L. (1989). ‘Lost in hyperspace’: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext document. In R. McAleese (Ed.), Hypertext: Theory into practice (pp. 90–105). Oxford: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, C. L. (1989). Detecting lost users: Empirical Studies on browsing hypertext (No. Report No. 972, Programme 8). Sophia-Antipolis: INRIA.

  • Gabbard, R. B. (2000). Constructivism, hypermedia, and the world wide web. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (1994). A framework for the study of hypertext. Instructional Science, 22, 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerjets, P., & Hesse, F. W. (2004). When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learner activities and of students’ conceptions of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 445–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist, 38, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Heise, E. (2006a). Distraction in hypertext-based learning and problem solving: Effects of goal competition and task difficulty on strategies of information utilization and performance, (in press).

  • Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K. & Schorr, T. (2003). Modeling processes of volitional action control in multiple-task performance: How to explain effects of goal competition and task difficulty on processing strategies and performance within ACT-R. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3, 355–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Schuh, J. (2006b). Supporting information comparisons in example-based hypertext environments. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1364–1369). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K. (2001). Learning strategies and hypermedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, N. (1993). Learning with hypertext: Problems, principles and prospects. In C. McKnight, A. Dillon, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Hypertext. A psychological perspective (pp. 51–69). New York: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herder, E., & Juvina, I. (2004). Discovery of individual user navigation styles. In G. D. Magoulas & S. Y. Chen (Eds.), Adaptive Hypermedia AH2004 Workshop on Individual Differences in Adaptive Hypermedia. Eindhoven.

  • Hill, J., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the world-wide web. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 45, 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirashima, T., Hachiya, K., Kashihara, A., & Toyoda, J. (1997). Information filtering using user’s context on browsing in hypertext. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 7, 239–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S. (1997). Elaboration Theory and hypermedia: Is there a link? Educational Technology, 37, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, M. A., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1994). The ElectroText Project: Hypertext reading patterns of middle school students. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3, 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 145–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1995). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4, 321–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Ambruso, D. R., & Olesen, J. (1992). Designing a hypertext on transfusion medicine using cognitive flexibility theory. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Grabinger, R. S. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 3–25). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. E. (1993). Designing instructional hypertext for use in lecture note review: Knowledge engineering and preliminary testing. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, 149–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1995). Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing. Behavior and Information Technology, 14, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension—A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, L. A., Reed, W. M., & Fitzgerald, G. E. (2001). The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landow, G. P. (1990). Popular fallacies about hypertext. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 39–59). Weinheim: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landow, G. P. (1992). Hypertext. The convergence of contemporary literary theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Last, D. A., O’Donnell, A. M., & Kelly, A. E. (2001). The effects of prior knowledge and goal strength on the use of hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). Domain knowledge, interest and hypertext navigation: A study of individual differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., Mills, R., & Brown, S. W. (2002). Children’s hypertext navigation strategies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 34, 274–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-S., & Lee, Y. H. (1991). Effects of learner-control versus program-control strategies on computer-aided learning of chemistry problems: For acquisition or review? Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 491–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. B., & Lehman, J. D. (1993). Instructional cuing in hypermedia: A study with active and passive learners. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 2, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-H., & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (1996) Effects of Linking structure and cognitive style on students’ performance and attitude in a computer based hypertext environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of promoting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunts, E. (2002). What does the literature say about the effectiveness of learner control in computer-assisted instruction? Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1(2).

  • MacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: Cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, T., Kibby, M., & Anderson, T. (1990). Learning about learning from hypertext. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 227–250). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998a). Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 40, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998b). Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1999). Spatial versus conceptual maps as learning tools in hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 8, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, D. (1992). Hypertext, CAI, paper, or program control: Do learners benefit from choices? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 513–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, E. G. (1996). Knowledge representation and construction in hypermedia environments. Telematics and Informatics, 13, 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melara, G. E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertext environments: Hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D. M. (1980). Learning control in computer based learning. Computers & Education, 4, 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R. J. (2001). Analyzing instructional software using a computer-tracking system. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R. J., Paper, D., Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2002). Hypertext navigation—An intrinsic component of the corporate intranet. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42, 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misanchuk, E. R., & Schwier, R. A. (1992). Representing interactive multimedia and hypermedia audit trails. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. L., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemiec, R. P., Sikorski, C., & Walberg, H. J. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, R. M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypermedia document on users’ navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer studies, 57, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, R. (1998). The effects of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 7, 123–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, N. G. (2000). Hypertext and the changing roles of readers. English Journal, 90, 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazzani, M. (1991). The influence of prior knowledge on concept acquisition: Experimental and computational results. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 416–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 327–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. M., & Oughton, J. M. (1997). Computer experience and interval-based hypermedia navigation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G. (2003). Evaluating interactive learning systems. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). The Elaboration Theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 335–381). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F. (1990). Interactive text processing by inexperienced (hyper-) readers. In A. Rizk, N. Streitz, & J. André (Eds.), Hypertext: Concepts, systems, and applications. Proceedings of the first European conference on hypertext (pp. 250–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specifity and prior knowledge on students’ search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 15, 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F., & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9–23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R. J. (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmeron, L., Canas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40, 171–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20, 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Heise, E. (2000). Hypertext navigation and conflicting goal intentions: Using log files to study distraction and volitional protection in learning and problem solving. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 441–446). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., & Catrambone, R. (2006). A methodological alternative to media comparison studies: Linking information utilization strategies and instructional approach in hypermedia learning. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2117–2122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. M. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. M., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 605–622). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, E. C., Schallert, D. L., & Savenye, W. C. (1994). Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students’ learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J. (1993). A macroadaptive approach to tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 4, 61–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyu, H. S., & Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 19, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyu, H. S., & Brown, S. W. (1995). Learner-Control: The effects on learning a procedural task during computer-based videodisc instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 22, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educational Psychologist, 15, 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J.-C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tergan, S.-O. (1997). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 209–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, M. J., & Payne, D. G. (1996). Comprehension and retention of nonlinear text: Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, P. (1990). Models of hypertext structure and learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 61–67). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Danlosky & A. C. Graesser (Hrsg.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, S.-W., & Lehman, J. D. (2001). Effects of learner control and learning strategies on English as a foreign language (EFL) learning from interactive hypermedia lessons. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10, 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, E. (1999). Hypermedia interface design: The effects of number of links and granularity of nodes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 331–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Scheiter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments. Educ Psychol Rev 19, 285–307 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3

Keywords

Navigation