Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Regulation of Learning within Computer-based Learning Environments: A Critical Analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) present important opportunities for fostering learning; however, studies have shown that students have difficulty when learning with these environments. Research has identified that students’ self-regulatory learning (SRL) processes may mediate the hypothesized positive relations between CBLEs and academic performance. In this review, we identified 33 empirical studies of SRL and CBLEs. We address three research questions: (1) How do learner and task characteristics relate to students’ SRL with CBLEs? (2) Can various learning supports or conditions enhance the quality of students’ SRL as they learn with CBLEs? (3) What conceptual, theoretical, and methodological issues exist for this growing area of research? We found evidence that specific SRL processes are more often associated with academic success than others and that SRL skills can be supported. We also identified a number of issues that researchers should aim to address in future investigations, including a more comprehensive measurement of facets of SRL and the quality of SRL processes, the seeming disconnect between SRL processes and learning outcomes, and the distinction between self- and other-regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004a). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004b). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Winters, F. I., & Moos, D. C. (2004c). Can students collaboratively use hypermedia to learn science? The dynamics of self-and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 215–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). The multidimensional self-efficacy scales. Unpublished test, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

  • Chen, M. (1995). A methodology for characterizing computer-based learning environments. Instructional Science, 23, 183–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, F., Kollöffel, B., van der Meijden, H., Staarman, J. K., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review (this issue).

  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eom, W., & Reiser, R. A. (2000). The effects of self-regulation and instructional control on performance and motivation in computer-based instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(3), 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation within the theories of James, Vygotsky, and Piaget. Educational Psychology Review (this issue).

  • Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(2), 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students’ use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers and Education, 50, 1069–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: foundation, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II (pp. 115–140). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Understanding complex systems: some core challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., & Salovaara, H. (2004). The interplay of motivational goals and cognitive strategies in a new pedagogical culture: a context-oriented and qualitative approach. European Psychologist, 9(4), 232–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1&2), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2004). Promoting self-regulation in distributed learning environments with web-based pedagogical tools: An exploratory study. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 15(1–2), 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Hirsch, C. (2003). Using computer algebra systems in mathematical classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2005). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006a). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006b). Online interactions in a mathematical classroom. Educational Media International, 43(1), 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology, 2nd ed (pp. 803–821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandinach, E. B., & Cline, H. F. (2000). It won’t happen soon: practical, curricular, and methodological problems in implementing technology-based constructivist approaches in classrooms. In S. Derry, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 377–398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, T. F. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a web-based hypermedia learning environment: nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 219–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2006). The role of goal structure in undergraduates’ use of self-regulatory processes in two hypermedia learning tasks. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(2), 49–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008a). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: the impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1686–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008b). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: the role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2003). Planning for two transformations in education and learning technology: report of a workshop. Committee on Improving Learning with Information Technology. In R. Pea, W. A. Wulf, S. W. Elliott, & M. A. Darling (Eds.), Center for Education and Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education and Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J. C., Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., Zhou, M., MacAllister, K., et al. (2006). Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proske, A., Narciss, S., & Korndle, H. (2007). Interactivity and learners’ achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 511–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: what have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiber, L. P. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 549–568). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovaara, H. (2005). An exploration of students’ strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs, and metacognitive calibration: an exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research of educational communications and technology (pp. 957–983). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 51–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner-controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(2), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. E. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Tsikalas, K. E. (2005). Can computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning? Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 267–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful and eminently helpful comments from our developmental reviewers: Kimberly Lawless, Richard Mayer, and Daniel Moos.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development, Institute for Child study, University of Maryland, 3304 Benjamin Building (#143), College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Fielding I. Winters & Claudine M. Costich

  2. College of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Jeffrey A. Greene

Authors
  1. Fielding I. Winters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeffrey A. Greene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudine M. Costich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fielding I. Winters.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

Summary table for articles investigating self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments (DOC 84 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winters, F.I., Greene, J.A. & Costich, C.M. Self-Regulation of Learning within Computer-based Learning Environments: A Critical Analysis. Educ Psychol Rev 20, 429–444 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation