Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Network Analysis in E-Learning Environments: A Preliminary Systematic Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

E-learning occupies an increasingly prominent place in education. It provides the learner with a rich virtual network where he or she can exchange ideas and information and create synergies through interactions with other members of the network, whether fellow learners or teachers. Social network analysis (SNA) has proven extremely powerful at describing and analysing network behaviours in business, economics and medicine, but its application to e-learning has been relatively limited. This systematic review of the literature on SNA in e-learning aimed to assess the evidence for using SNA as a way to understand and improve e-learning systems, as well as suggest directions for future research. Most of the 37 studies included in this review applied various methods to analyse interaction patterns in forums involving one-mode networks. Indices of centrality and density were the SNA measures most often used. Although the small number of included studies means that our systematic review should be considered preliminary, the evidence so far strongly suggests that SNA, particularly when combined with content analysis, can provide a detailed understanding of the nature and type of interactions between members of the network, allowing for optimisation of course design, composition of learner groups and identification of learners in danger of dropping out. Future studies should examine two-mode networks and communication channels like chat rooms, wikis, blogs and microblogs. Whenever possible, future studies should also include a quantitative approach that exploits the statistical power of SNA to explain complex systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aplin, C. T. (2008). Innovative trends in learning tools. Journal of Cognitive Affective Learning, OxfordCollege of Emory University, 4(2), 1549–6953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviv, R., et al. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & McClelland, D. C. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, Z. L., & Collins, M. P. (1995). Computer mediated communication and the online classroom: distance learning. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, Z. L., & Huang, Y.-P. (2004). A model for sustainable student retention: a holistic perspective on the student dropout problem with special attention to e-learning. DEOSNEWS, 13(5), 1–26.

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., et al. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19(3), 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., et al. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. SAGE Publications Limited.

  • Brenner, G. F., Norvell, N. K., & Limacher, M. (1989). Supportive and problematic social interactions: a social network analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17(6), 831–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capuano, N., Laria, G., Mazzoni, E., Pierri, A., & Mangione, G. R. (2011). Improving Role Taking in CSCL Script Using SNA and Semantic Web. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on, 636–637. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2011.197.

  • Carolan, B. V. (2013). Social network analysis and education: theory, methods & applications. New York: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, B. V., & Natriello, G. (2005). Data-mining journals and books: using the science of networks to uncover the structure of the educational research community. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre canadien de gestion, & Drucker, P. F. (1995). The age of social transformation. Ottawa: Centre canadien de gestion.

  • Chang, W.-C., Lin, H.-W. & Wu, L.-C. (2010). Applied social network analysis to project curriculum. In: Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management (NCM), 2010 Sixth International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 710–715.

  • Chen, Z. & Watanabe, S. (2007). A case study of applying SNA to analyze CSCL social network. In: Advanced Learning Technologies, 2007. ICALT 2007. Seventh IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 18–20.

  • Cho, H., et al. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corallo, A., et al. (2010). A methodological framework to monitor the performance of virtual learning communities. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 20(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, B. K., McCalla, G. I., & Schwier, R. A. (2008). Social network Analysis techniques and implications for information and knowledge sharing in virtual learning communities. International Journal of Advanced Media Communication, 2(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. (2010). “Seeing” the learning community: an exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 736–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M. (2002). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community. International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp. 625–626.

  • De Laat, M., et al. (2006). Analysing student engagement with learning and tutoring activities in networked learning communities: a multi-method approach. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 2(4), 394–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M., et al. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: a role for social network analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dradilova, P. et al. (2008). Analysis of relations in eLearning. In: Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 2008. WI-IAT’08. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 373–376.

  • Duensing, A., et al. (2006). Face-to-face and online interactions-is a task a task? Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlin, B.Y., Yusof, N. & Rahman, A.A. (2008). Integrating content analysis and social network analysis for analyzing asynchronous discussion forum. In: Information Technology, 2008. ITSim 2008. International Symposium on. IEEE, pp. 1–8.

  • Erlin, Yusof, N. & Rahman, A.A. (2009). Analyzing online asynchronous discussion using content and social network analysis. 2009 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp.872–877.

  • Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners drop out. Workforce, 80(10), 52–61.

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 3(1). doi:10.1111/j.10836101.1997.tb00062.x.

  • Gottardo, E. & Noronha, R.V. (2012). Social networks applied to distance education courses: analysis of interaction in discussion forums. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian symposium on Multimedia and the web. ACM, pp. 355–358.

  • Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age Web 2.0 and classroom research: what path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. A., Godley, J., & Hawe, P. (2010). Understanding interdisciplinary collaborations as social networks. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1–2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamulic, I., & Bijedic, N. (2009). Social network analysis in virtual learning community at faculty of information technologies (fit), Mostar. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2269–2273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.

  • Haythornthwaite, C. (1999). Collaborative work networks among distributed learners. In System Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, p. 16 pp.

  • Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, G. S., Pattison, E. M., & Llamas, R. (1981). Models of social network intervention. International Journal of Family Therapy, 3(4), 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, R., Croft, D. P., & Krause, J. (2009). Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(7), 989–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., et al. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative learning. Wiley Online Library.

  • Kasper, C., & Voelkl, B. (2009). A social network analysis of primate groups. Primates, 50(4), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, D. (2002). The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning, ZIFF papiere 119. Retrieved from ERIC ED472435 database. Available from http://www.fernuni-hagen.de/ZIFF.

  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK: Keele University, 33, 2004.

  • Laghos, A. & Zaphiris, P. (2006). Sociology of student-centred e-learning communities: a network analysis. In Proceedings of the IADIS international conference, e-Society. Citeseer, pp. 13–16.

  • Latapy, M., Magnien, C., & Vecchio, N. D. (2008). Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Social Networks, 30(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, E. et al. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: a review. The JHGI Giesbers reports on education, 10.

  • Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, W.-Y., So, H.-J., & Tan, S.-C. (2010). eLearning 2.0 and new literacies: are social practices lagging behind? Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F. & Chen, C. (2004). Developing and evaluating the social network analysis system for virtual teams in cyber communities. In System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, p. 8 pp.

  • Lipponen, L., et al. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A. (2003). Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning. London: Routledge.

  • Lorenzo, C.-M., Ángel Sicilia, M., & Sánchez, S. (2012). Studying the effectiveness of multi-user immersive environments for collaborative evaluation tasks. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1361–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau, D. (2006). Evidence for social role in a dolphin social network. Evolutionary Ecology, 21(3), 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansur, A.B..F., Yusof, N. & Othman, M.S. (2011). Analysis of social learning network for wiki in moodle E-learning. In: Interaction Sciences (ICIS), 2011 4th International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 1–4.

  • Martınez, A., et al. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2006). Elearning: the key concepts. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlo, E., Ríos, S. A., Álvarez, H., L’Huillier, G., & Velásquez, J. D. (2010). Finding inner copy communities using social network analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems: Part II (pp. 581–590). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1885375.1885441.

  • Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251–262. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001.

  • Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (2005). The concept of “5, 4”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. Knowledge management: critical perspectives on business and management, 2(3), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmela, K., Lehtinen, E. & Palonen, T. (1999). Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. International Society of the Learning Sciences, p. 54.

  • O’Connor, C. et al. (2003). Departure, abandonment, and dropout of e-learning: dilemma and solutions. In TechLearn 2003 Conference.

  • Pappano, L. (2012). Massive open online courses are multiplying at a rapid pace. The New York Times, p. 2.

  • Paredes, W.C. & Chung, K.S.K. (2012). Modelling learning & performance: a social networks perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM, pp. 34–42.

  • Peng He. (2012). Evaluating students online discussion performance by using social network analysis. Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), 2012 Ninth International Conference on, pp.854–855.

  • Pham, M. C., Klamma, R., & Jarke, M. (2011). Development of computer science disciplines: a social network analysis approach. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 1(4), 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittinsky, M., & Carolan, B. V. (2008). Behavioral versus cognitive classroom friendship networks. Social Psychology of Education, 11(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, N., & Daniel, B. K. (2006). Social Network and Content Analysis of Interactions in a Video-Mediated Virtual Community. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies pp. 901–903.

  • Prell, C. (2011). Social network analysis: history, theory and methodology. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prell, C., et al. (2008). “Who”s in the network?’ When stakeholders influence data analysis. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(6), 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbany, R., Takaffoli, M., & Zaïane, O. R. (2012). Social network analysis and mining to support the assessment of on-line student participation. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 13(2), 20–29.

  • Retzer, S., Yoong, P., & Hooper, V. (2012). Inter-organisational knowledge transfer in social networks: A definition of intermediate ties. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 343–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rienties, B., et al. (2009). The role of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1195–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, D., et al. (2011). Exploring affiliation network models as a collaborative filtering mechanism in e-learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, L. D. (2010). Rewired: understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. California: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D., Miagkikh, V. & Suthers, D. (2011). Social and semantic network analysis of chat logs. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM, pp. 134–139.

  • Rosmarakis, E. S., Soteriades, E. S., Vergidis, P. I., Kasiakou, S. K., & Falagas, M. E. (2005). From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals. The FASEB Journal, 19(7), 673–680.

  • Ryymin, E., Palonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Networking relations of using ICT within a teacher community. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1264–1282. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.12.001.

  • Saltz, J. S., Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2004). Student social graphs: visualizing a student’s online social network. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, pp. 596–599.

  • Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: a handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. London: Sage.

  • Sie, R. L., Ullmann, T. D., Rajagopal, K., Cela, K., Bitter–Rijpkema, M., & Sloep, P. B. (2012). Social network analysis for technology-enhanced learning: review and future directions. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(3), 172–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sing, C. C., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in online community. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spadavecchia, C. & Giovannella, C. (2010). Monitoring learning experiences and styles: the socio-emotional level. In: Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2010 I.E. 10th International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 445–449.

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: an historical perspective. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2006.

  • Staples, M., & Niazi, M. (2007). Experiences using systematic review guidelines. Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering EASE06, 80(9), 1425–1437. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.046.

  • Stepanyan, K., Borau, K. & Ullrich, C. (2010). A social network analysis perspective on student interaction within the twitter microblogging environment. In: Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2010 I.E. 10th International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 70–72.

  • Suh, H. et al. (2005). Identifying peer interaction patterns and related variables in community-based learning. In: Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years! International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp. 657–661.

  • Teplovs, C., Fujita, N. & Vatrapu, R. (2011). Generating predictive models of learner community dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM, pp. 147–152.

  • Ter Wal, A. L. J., & Boschma, R. A. (2008). Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 739–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W. (2010). Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Vygotskiĭ, L. L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. Culture of the Internet, 4, 179–205.

  • Willging, P. A. (2005). Using social network analysis techniques to examine online interactions. US-China Education Review, 2(9), 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y. (2010). Comparing two discussion designs in terms of student online interactions. In: Education Technology and Computer (ICETC), 2010 2nd International Conference on. IEEE, pp. V1–219–V1–222.

  • Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2010). A case study on web-based knowledge construction in Moodle platform. In Computer Science and Education (ICCSE), 2010 5th International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 1110–1114.

  • Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., & Wu, K. (2011). The development of social network analysis research in mainland China: a literature review perspective. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. ACM, pp. 296–303.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the MAVSEL project (Mining, Data Analysis and Visualisation Based on Social Aspects of e-Learning) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (TIN2010-21715-C02-01) and the SENESCYT of Ecuador.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, University of Alcalá, Polytechnic Building, Ctra, Barcelona Km. 33.6, 28871, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

    Karina L. Cela, Miguel Ángel Sicilia & Salvador Sánchez

  2. Computer Science Department, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas - ESPE, Av. Gral. Rumiñahui s/n, 171-5-231B, Sangolquí, Ecuador

    Karina L. Cela

Authors
  1. Karina L. Cela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Ángel Sicilia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salvador Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina L. Cela.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9 Summary of selected studies
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cela, K.L., Sicilia, M.Á. & Sánchez, S. Social Network Analysis in E-Learning Environments: A Preliminary Systematic Review. Educ Psychol Rev 27, 219–246 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9276-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9276-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation