Skip to main content
Log in

Surface thermal structure in a shallow-water, vertical discharge from a coastal power plant

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surface temperature field induced by a turbulent buoyant jet, discharging upwards into shallow water and impinging on the water surface, is examined for the case of a power-plant cooling-water outfall off the southern California coast. The data, acquired using an airborne infrared camera, capture the evolution of turbulent-scale structure, as well as the advection of larger-scale patterns that can be used to infer the surface velocity. Some limited in-water measurements were also made. When the ambient, or receiving, water is relatively stagnant, the buoyant fluid moves nearly symmetrically outward from the impingement zone, and both the thermal and velocity fields decay over a radial distance of several tens of meters. Flow in this symmetric case appears to remain supercritical into the far-field, which differs from a recent numerical modeling study that predicts a near-field hydraulic jump. Within the plume, the data show an expanding set of thermal bands, similar to ring-like structures found in laboratory studies of a buoyant vertical jet having a stable near-field. In the presence of an alongshore current, both the plume and thermal bands become stretched out in the downstream direction; but this effect can be accounted for, and the thermal structure made symmetrical, by using an approximate two-dimensional model of the flow field. Characteristics of the observed thermal bands are compared against three ring-creation mechanisms proposed in the literature (jet vortex instability, horizontal shear instability, and internal bore formation), but the present dataset is insufficient to discriminate amongst them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alavian V, Hoopes JA (1982) Thermal fronts in heated water discharges. J Hydraul Div 108:707–725

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cataldo JC (1984) Dynamic behavior of thermal plume. J Hydraul Eng 110:18–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen JC (1980) Studies on gravitational spreading currents. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 470 pp

  4. Davies PA, Mofor LA (1993) Remote sensing observations and analyses of cooling water discharges from a coastal power station. Int J Remote Sens 14:253–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies PA, Mofor LA, Jiao Y (1993) Foam lines generated by a spreading buoyant plume. Int J Remote Sens 14:2647–2663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies PA, Mofor LA, Neves MJV (1997) Comparisons of remotely sensed observations with modelling predictions for the behaviour of wastewater plumes from coastal discharges. Int J Remote Sens 18:1987–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fairall CW et al (2003) Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes: updates and verification for the COARE algorithm. J Clim 16:571–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox RW, McDonald AT (1992) Introduction to fluid mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garvine RW (1984) Radial spreading of buoyant, surface plumes in coastal waters. J Geophys Res 89:1989–1996. doi:10.1029/JC089iC02p01989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gosink JP (1982) Thermal front formation from buoyant surface jets. J Hydraul Div 108:252–257

    Google Scholar 

  11. Green T, Roffler S (1981) Field observations of fronts and high-frequency temperature fluctuations in a thermal plume. Adv Water Resour 4:137–145. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(81)90045-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuang CP, Lee JHW (2006) Stability and mixing of a vertical axisymmetric buoyant jet in shallow water. Environ Fluid Mech 6:153–180. doi:10.1007/s10652-006-0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhlman JM, Prahl JM (1975) Observations of the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in laboratory models and field examples of thermal plumes. J Great Lakes Res 1:101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawrence GA, Maclatchy MR (2001) Radially spreading buoyant flows. J Hydraul Res 39:583–590. doi:10.1080/00221686.2001.9628287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JHW, Jirka GH (1981) Vertical round buoyant jet in shallow water. J Hydraul Div Proc ASCE 107:1651–1675

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JHW, Chu VH (2003) Turbulent jets and plumes: a Lagrangian approach. Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, p 390

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts PJ, Salas HJ, Reiff FM, Libhaber M (2010) Marine wastewater outfalls and treatment systems. Int Water Assn., London, p 528

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scarpace FL, Green T (1973) Dynamic surface temperature structure of thermal plumes. Water Resour Res 9:138–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thorpe SA, Kavcic I (2008) The circular internal hydraulic jump. J Fluid Mech 610:99–129. doi:10.1017/S0022112008002553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian X, Roberts PJW, Daviero GJ (2004) Marine wastewater discharges from multiport diffusers. I: unstratified stationary water. J Hydraul Eng 130:1137–1146. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)

  21. Trent DS, Welty JR (1973) Numerical thermal plume model for vertical outfalls in shallow water. EPA, Tech Ser. Rep. EPA-R2-73-162, 486 p. Available from National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP), nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/910082UB.PDF

  22. Turner JS (1973) Buoyancy effects in fluids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Uddin N, Neumann SO, Weigand B (2013) LES simulations of an impinging jet: on the origin of the second peak in the Nusselt number distribution. Int J Heat Mass Transf 57:356–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ulasir M, Wright SJ (2003) Influence of downstream control and limited depth on flow hydrodynamics of impinging buoyant jets. Environ Fluid Mech 3:85–107. doi:10.1023/A:1022027003377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Violato D, Ianiro A, Gennaro G, Scarano F (2012) Three-dimensional vortex dynamics and convective heat transfer in circular and chevron impinging jets. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 37:22–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wright SJ, Roberts PJW, Zhongmin Y, Bradley NE (1991) Surface dilution of round submerged buoyant jets. J Hydraul Res 29:67–89. doi:10.1080/00221689109498993

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was made possible through the support of the Office of Naval Research and conducted under Naval Research Laboratory project 72-9201. NRL contribution NRL/JA/7230–14-0041.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Marmorino.

Appendix: Potential flow

Appendix: Potential flow

For a two-dimensional flow that is both incompressible and irrotational, velocity components \(u\) and \(v\) can be expressed in terms of a stream function, \(\varPsi \), and a velocity potential, \(\phi \):

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} u=\frac{\partial \psi }{\partial y},v=-\frac{\partial \psi }{\partial x}; \\ u=-\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial x},v=-\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial y}. \\ \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(2)

For a uniform flow with velocity components \(u=U\) and \(v\) = 0, the stream function and velocity potential can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \psi =Uy, \\ \phi =-Ux. \\ \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(3)

In case of a point source, velocities are given in polar coordinates with radial velocity \(V_{r}=q/(2\pi r)\), where \(q\) is volume flow rate per unit depth at the point source, and tangential velocity \(V_{\theta } = 0\). The resulting stream function and velocity potential are given as

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \psi =\frac{q}{2\pi }\theta , \\ \phi =-\frac{q}{2\pi }\ln r. \\ \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(4)

As the flow is incompressible and irrotational, both \(\varPsi \) and \(\phi \) satisfy Laplace’s equation. Therefore, solutions for multiple flow patterns can be linearly superposed. Thus the solution for a source in an ambient flow becomes

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \psi =\frac{q}{2\pi }\theta +Ur\sin \theta , \\ \phi =-\frac{q}{2\pi }\ln r+Ur\cos \theta . \\ \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(5)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marmorino, G., Savelyev, I. & Smith, G.B. Surface thermal structure in a shallow-water, vertical discharge from a coastal power plant. Environ Fluid Mech 15, 207–229 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9373-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9373-0

Keywords

Navigation