Abstract
To develop an effective waste management strategy for a given region, it is important to know the amount of waste generated and the composition of the waste stream. Past research has shown that the amount of waste generated is proportional to the population and the average mean living standards or the average income of the people. In addition, other factors may affect the amount and composition of waste. These are climate, living habits, level of education, religious and cultural beliefs, and social and public attitudes. This paper presents the findings of a study carried out in a suburban municipal area in Sri Lanka to determine the solid waste generation rate and waste composition based on field surveys and to determine the related socio-economic factors. A database was developed that included information on the quantity and composition of waste generated in a sample of households in the study area over a time period. The collected data was analysed to relate waste generation and composition data to various socio-economic factors. Over 400 sample households were selected for the study using a stratified random sampling methodology based on municipal wards and property values. A technique that considers both the number of households in a particular income group (property value range) and the standard deviation of property values within a given income group was used to determine the appropriate sample size for each municipal ward. Through category and regression analyses, the quantities of waste and waste composition were related to several socio-economic factors. The paper describes the basis for the sample selection, the methodology adopted for data collection, the socio-economic parameters used for the analysis, and the relationships developed from the analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Momani, A. H. (1994). Solid waste management: Sampling, analysis and assessment of household waste in the city of Amman. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 4, 208–222.
Brunnr, P. H., & Ernst, W. R. (1986). Alternative methods for the analysis of municipal solid waste. Waste Management & Research, 4, 147–160.
Daskapoulos, E., Badr, S. D., & Probert, S. D. (1998). Municipal solid waste: A prediction methodology for the generation rate and composition in the European Union countries and the United States of America. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 24, 155–166, (1998).
Gay, A. E., Beam, T. G., & Mar, B. W. (1993). Cost-effective solid-waste characterization methodology. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 119(4), 631–644.
Grossmann, D., Hudson, J. F., & Marks, D. H. (1974). Waste generation models for solid waste collection. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, 100, 1219–1230.
Hockett, D., Lober, D. J., & Pilgrim, K. (1995). Determinants of per capita municipal solid waste generation in the sub-eastern United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 45, 205–217.
King, B. J., & Murphy R. C. (1996). Survey to estimate residential solid waste generation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122(10)897–901.
Medina, M. (1997). The effect of income on municipal solid waste generation rates for countries of varying levels of economic development: A model. Journal of Resource Management and Technology, 24(3), 149–155, 1997.
Purdy, S., & Sabugal, F. (1999). Waste composition/generation study for the city of Davao, Mindanao, Philippines. Proceedings of Sardinia 99, seventh international waste management and landfill symposium, Cagliari, Italy, 4–8 October, 1999.
Wertz, K. L. (1976). Economic factors influencing households’ reproduction of refuse. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2, 263–272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bandara, N.J.G.J., Hettiaratchi, J.P.A., Wirasinghe, S.C. et al. Relation of waste generation and composition to socio-economic factors: a case study. Environ Monit Assess 135, 31–39 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9705-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9705-3