Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application and evaluation of kriging and cokriging methods on groundwater depth mapping

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater and water resources management play a key role in conserving the sustainable conditions in arid and semi-arid regions. Applying some techniques that can reveal the critical and hot conditions of water resources seem necessary. In this study, kriging and cokriging methods were evaluated for mapping the groundwater depth across a plain in which has experienced different climatic conditions (dry, wet, and normal) and consequently high variations in groundwater depth in a 12 year led in maximum, minimum, and mean depths. During this period groundwater depth has considerable fluctuations. Results obtained from geostatistical analysis showed that groundwater depth varies spatially in different climatic conditions. Furthermore, the calculated RMSE showed that cokriging approach was more accurate than kriging in mapping the groundwater depth though there was not a distinct difference. As a whole, kriging underestimated the real groundwater depth for dry, wet, and normal conditions by 5.5, 2.2, and 5.3%, while cokriging underestimations were 3.3, 2, and 2.2%, respectively; which showed the unbiasedness in estimations. Results implied that in the study area farming and cultivation in dry conditions needs more attention due to higher variability in groundwater depth in short distances compared to the other climate conditions. It is believed that geostatistical approaches are reliable tools for water resources managers and water authorities to allocate groundwater resources in different environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi, S. H., & Niazi Ardekani, J. (2006). The effect of water salinity on growth and physiological stages of eight Canola (Brassica napus) cultivars. Irrigation Science, 25, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi, S. H., & Sedghamiz, A. (2007). Geostatistical analysis of spatial and temporal variations of groundwater level. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment doi:10.1007/s10661-006-9361-z (in press).

  • Alley, W. M., & Taylor, C. J. (2001). The value of long-term ground water level monitoring. Ground Water, 39, 801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella, C. A., Moorman, T. B., Novak, J. M., Parkin, T. B., Karlen, D. L., Turco, R. F., et al. (1994). Field scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58, 1501–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K., & Hunter, P. (2002). Using spatial models and kriging techniques to optimize long-term ground-water monitoring networks: A case study. Environmetrics, 13, 629–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christakos, G. (2000). Modern spatiotemporal geostatistics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desbarats, A. J., Logan, C. E., Hinton, M. L., & Sharpe, D. R. (2002). On the kriging of water table elevations using collateral information from a digital elevation model. Journal of Hydrology, 255, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fars Regional Water Organization (2005). Study center for east of Fars, report of studies on groundwater levels for Darab, Ghale biyaban, and Derkouyeh regions.

  • Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, R. J., Clapp, R. B., Thomas, A. L., Hunley, A. E., Farrow, N. D., & Dearstone, K. C. (1989). Cokriging model for estimation of water table elevation. Water Resources Research, 25, 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks, E., & Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitanidis, P. K. (1997). Introduction to geostatistics: Application to hydrogeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Sondhi, S. K., & Phogat, V. (2005). Network design for groundwater level monitoring in upper Bari Doab canal tract, Punjab, India. Irrigation and Drainage, 54, 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuangthong, O., McLennan, J. A., & Deutsch, C. V. (2004). Minimum acceptance criteria for geostatistical realizations. Natural Resources Research, 13, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Song, K., Li, X., Li, J., et al. (2006). Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of related factors in croplands of the black soil region, northeast China. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment, 113, 73–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, T. Sh., Sophocleous, M., & Yu, Ysh. (1999). Geostatistical applications in ground water modeling in south-Central Kansas. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noshadi, M., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2005). Application of geostatistics for potential evapotranspiration estimation. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology. Transaction B, 29(B3), 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, L. M., Cunha, M. C., & Ribeiro, L. (2004). Groundwater monitoring network optimization with redundancy reduction. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olea, R., & Davis, J. (1999). Optimizing the High Plains aquifer water-level observation network. Kansas Geological Surveying Open File Report 1999–15.

  • Prakash, M. R., & Singh, V. S. (2000). Network design for groundwater monitoring – A case study. Environmental Geology, 39, 628–632.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pucci, A. A., & Murashige, J. A. E. (1987). Application of universal kriging to an aquifer study in New Jersey. Ground Water, 25, 672–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reghunath, R., Murthy, T. R., & Raghavan, B. R. (2005). Time series analysis to monitor and assess water resources: A moving average approach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 109, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouhani, Sh., & Wackernagel, H. (1990). Multivariate geostatistical approach to space–time data analysis. Water Resources Research, 26, 585–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepaskhah, A. R., Ahmadi, S. H., & Nikbakht Shahbazi, A. R. (2005). Geostatistical analysis of sorptivity for a soil under tilled and no-tilled conditions. Soil and Tillage Research, 83, 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiati, K. (1999). World water vision for food: Country case study Iran. Paper presented at the MENA Consultation Meeting, Bari, Italy.

  • Smedema, L. K., & Shiati, K. (2002). Irrigation and salinity: A perspective review of the salinity hazards of irrigation development in the arid zone. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 16, 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical methods (6th ed.). Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous, M., Paschetto, J. E., & Olea, A. (1982). Ground water network design for northwest Kansas, using the theory of regionalized variables. Ground Water, 20, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodossiou, N., & Latinopoulos, P. (2006). Evaluation and optimization of groundwater observation networks using the kriging methodology. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21, 991–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin, M. J., & Larson, S. P. (2002). Kriging water levels with a regional-linear and point-logarithmic drift. Ground Water, 40, 185–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafilis, J., Odeh, I. O. A., Warr, B., & Ahmed, M. F. (2004). Mapping of salinity risk in the lower Namoi vally using non-linear kriging methods. Agricultural Water Management, 69, 203–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2001). Geostatistics for environmental scientists. England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Hamid Ahmadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmadi, S.H., Sedghamiz, A. Application and evaluation of kriging and cokriging methods on groundwater depth mapping. Environ Monit Assess 138, 357–368 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9803-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9803-2

Keywords

Navigation