Abstract
This paper presents an efficient methodology for developing pollutant discharge permit trading in river systems considering the conflict of interests of involving decision-makers and the stakeholders. In this methodology, a trade-off curve between objectives is developed using a powerful and recently developed multi-objective genetic algorithm technique known as the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II). The best non-dominated solution on the trade-off curve is defined using the Young conflict resolution theory, which considers the utility functions of decision makers and stakeholders of the system. These utility functions are related to the total treatment cost and a fuzzy risk of violating the water quality standards. The fuzzy risk is evaluated using the Monte Carlo analysis. Finally, an optimization model provides the trading discharge permit policies. The practical utility of the proposed methodology in decision-making is illustrated through a realistic example of the Zarjub River in the northern part of Iran.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrishamchi, A., Afshar, A., & Kerachian, R. (2003). Spillway capacity optimization under hydrologic uncertainties. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, 27(B1), 111–122.
Brill, E. D., Eheart, J. W., Kshirsagar, S. R., & Lence, B. J. (1984). Water quality impacts of biochemical oxygen demand under transferable discharge permit programs. Water Resources Research, 20(4), 445–455.
Crocker, T. D. (1966). The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems. In H. Wolozin (Ed.), The economics of air pollution (pp. 61–68).
Dales, J. H. (1968). Land, water, and ownership. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1(4), 791–804.
Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., & Meyarivan, T. (2000). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. KANGAL Rep. No. 200001. Kanpur, India: Indian Institute of Technology.
Eheart, J. W. (1980). Cost efficiency of transferable discharge permits for the control of BOD discharges. Water Resources Research, 16, 980–989.
Eheart, J. W., Brill, E. D., Jr., Lence, B. J., Kilgore, J. D., & Uber, J. D. (1987). Cost efficiency of time-varying discharge permit programs for water quality management. Water Resources Research, 23(2), 245–251.
Ganji, A., Khalili, D., & Karamouz, M. (2007). Development of stochastic dynamic nash game model for reservoir operation. I: The symmetric stochastic model with perfect information. Advances in Water Resources, 30(3), 528–542.
Ghosh, S., & Mujumdar, P. P. (2006). Risk minimization in water quality control problems of a river system. Advances in Water Resources, 29(3), 458–470.
Hung, M., & Shaw, D. (2005). A trading-ratio system for trading water pollution discharge permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49, 83–102.
Iran Department of Environment (IDOE) (2005). Calculating Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the Zarjub River, Iran. Technical report.
Karamouz, M., Zahraie, B., & Kerachian, R. (2003). Development of a master plan for water pollution control using MCDM techniques: A case study. Water International, IWRA, 28(4), 478–490.
Kerachian, R., & Karamouz, M. (2006). Optimal reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: A stochastic conflict resolution approach. Water Resources Research, W12401, 42, 1–17.
Kerachian, R., & Karamouz, M. (2007). A Stochastic conflict resolution model for water quality management in reservoir-river systems. Advances in Water Resources, 30, 866–882.
Loaiciga, H. A. (2004). Analytic game—theoretic approach to ground-water extraction. Journal of Hydrology, 297(1/4), 22–33.
Montgomery, W. D. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economics Theory, 5(3), 395–418.
Napel, S. (2002). Bilateral bargaining: Theory and applications. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.
Ng, T. N., & Eheart, J. W. (2005). Effects of discharge permit trading on water quality reliability. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management ASCE, 31(2), 81–88.
Ning, S., & Chang, N. (2007). Watershed-based point sources permitting strategy and dynamic permit-trading analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(4), 427–446.
O’Neil, W. B. (1983). Transferable discharge permits trading under varying stream conditions: A simulation of multiperiod permit market performance on the Fox River, Wisconsin. Water Resources Research, 19, 608–612.
Richards, A., & Singh, N. (1996). Two level negotiations in bargaining over water. Proceedings of the international game theory conference, Bangalore, India, 1–23.
Salazar, R., Szidarouszky, F., Coppola, E., Jr., & Rojana, A. (2007). Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(4), 560–571.
Shirangi, E., Kerachian, R., & Shafai Bajestan, M. (2007). A simplified model for reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: Application of the Young conflict resolution theory. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Springer. doi:10.1007/s10661-007-0061-0, 1–13.
Streeter, H. W., & Phelps, E. B. (1925). A study of the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio River. III: Factors concerning the phenomena of oxidation and reaeration. Public Health Bulletin, 146.
US EPA (1996). Effluent trading in watersheds policy statement. Federal Register, 61(28), 4994–4996.
Yandamuri, S. R. M., Srinivasan, K., & Bhallamudi, S. M. (2006). Multiobjective optimal waste load allocation models for rivers using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management ASCE, 132(3), 133–143.
Young, H. P. (1993). An evolutionary model of bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory, 59, 145–168.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niksokhan, M.H., Kerachian, R. & Amin, P. A stochastic conflict resolution model for trading pollutant discharge permits in river systems. Environ Monit Assess 154, 219–232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0390-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0390-7