Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fluoride occurrence and assessment of exposure dose of fluoride in shallow aquifers of Makur, Unnao district Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The water samples from the shallow aquifers of Makur, Unnao district, Uttar Pradesh, was analyzed for fluoride content (F − ) and other water quality parameters such as pH, EC, CO3 2−, HCO3 , Cl − , Na + , Ca2 + , Mg2 +  and RSC. It was found that the F −  concentration of water varied between 1.05 to 13.9 mgl − 1 which exceeded the maximum desirable limits of 1.0 mgl − 1 of F −  as laid down by BIS and 68% of water exceeded maximum permissible limits of 1.5 mgl − 1 as prescribed by WHO. The correlation study of fluoride indicated that F −  has a significant (p < 0.05) positive relationship with pH (r = +0.59) and RSC (r = 0.54), while a significant negative correlation with Ca+Mg (r = −0.53) and Mg (r = −0.49). The exposure doses of fluoride in infants was found between 0.35 to 3.26 mg kg − 1day − 1 (if dug well water was used) whereas 0.36 to 4.63 mg kg − 1day − 1 (when shallow hand pumps) The exposure doses of water in case of children (20 kg body weight) varied between 0.157 to 1.47 mg kg − 1day − 1 (for dugwell) and 0.162 to 2.08 mg kg − 1day − 1 (for shallow hand pumps) whereas in case of adults (70 kg body weight), it varied between 0.09 to 0.839 mg kg − 1day − 1 (for dugwell) and 0.092 to 1.19 mg kg − 1day − 1 (shallow hand pumps) which is quite high against the standard value of 0.05 mg/kg/day which is the minimum risk level (MRL) calculated by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). The maximum exposure dose to fluoride for adults in the study area found to be 23.8 times higher than the ATSDR’s MRL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, C. S., & Choudhary, N. K. (2001). Fluoride pollution in ground water and related ill effects with geomorphological mapping using IRS data in parts of Unnao district. U.P. BSI Spl. Pub. No., 65(II), 187–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldo, M., Borja, V., Ramirez, A. L., Poncce, M., Rosas, M., & Diaz-Barriga, F. (1995). Endemic fluorosis in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. I. Identification of risk factor associated with human exposure to fluoride. Environmental Research, 68, 25–30. doi:10.1006/enrs.1995.1004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Banerjee, S., Saha, R., Datta, J. K., & Mondal, N. (2006). Fluoride geochemistry of ground water in Nalhati-1 bolck of Birbhum district, West Bengal. Fluoride, 39(4), 318–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. C., Doshi, C. S., & Paliwal, B. L. (1986). Occurrence and chemistry of high fluoride ground waters in Jalore district of Western Rajasthan. Annal of Arid Zone, 25, 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M. K., Singh, V., Rajwanshi, P., Srivastava, S., & Dass, S. (1994). Ground water fluoride level in rural area of district Agra. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 14(5), 370–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • GSI (2001). District Resource Map, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh. Geological Survey of India, Northen Region

  • Handa, B. K. (1975). Geochemistry and genesis of fluoride containing ground waters in India. Ground Water, 13(3), 275–281. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1975.tb03086.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Rai, D., Rai, P. K., Shukla, A. B., & Saxena, A. (2004). Fluoride pollution in ground water in parts of Unnao district: Impact and distribution. Extended summaries. In International conference on sustainable management of sodic land (p. 474).

  • Lenore, S. C., Arnold, E. G., & Andrew, D. E. (Eds.). (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water (20th ed.). Washington DC: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, D., Nair, A. P., & Satyanarayana, U. (2002). Fluoride in shallow aquifers of Rajgarh, tehsil of Churu district, Rajasthan—an arid environment. Current Science, 83(6), 699–702.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nawlakhe, W. G., & Bulusu, K. R. (1989). Water treatment technologies for removal of excessive fluoride. In C. P. Gupta (Ed.), Appropriate methodologies for development and management of ground water resources in developing countries (Vol. 2, pp. 815–828). New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, D., Castro, L., Turrubiartes, F., Milan, J., & Diaz-Barriga, F. (1998). Assessment of the exposure to fluoride from drinking water in Durango, Mexico, using a geographic information system. Fluoride, 31(4), 183–187.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B., & Narayan, P. (1980). Relationship between fluoride and other characteristics of underground irrigation waters in brackish water belt. Agrochimica, 24(203), 207–211.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, A. K., Dikshit, R. P., Tripathi, I. P., & Chaturvedi, S. K. (2003). Fluoride content in drinking water and ground water quality in rural areas of Tehsil Mau district, Chitrakoot. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 23(9), 1045–1050.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (1993). Guidelines for drinking water quality recommendations (2nd ed.). Geneva: World Health Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Jha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jha, S.K., Nayak, A.K. & Sharma, Y.K. Fluoride occurrence and assessment of exposure dose of fluoride in shallow aquifers of Makur, Unnao district Uttar Pradesh, India. Environ Monit Assess 156, 561–566 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0505-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0505-1

Keywords

Navigation