Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring conservation effectiveness in a global biodiversity hotspot: the contribution of land cover change assessment

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tropical forests, which play critical roles in global biogeochemical cycles, radiation budgets and biodiversity, have undergone rapid changes in land cover in the last few decades. This study examines the complex process of land cover change in the biodiversity hotspot of Western Ghats, India, specifically investigating the effects of conservation measures within the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Current vegetation patterns were mapped using an IRS P6 LISS III image and this was used together with Landsat MSS data from 1973 to map land cover transitions. Two major and divergent trends were observed. A dominant degradational trend can be attributed to agricultural expansion and infrastructure development while a successional trend, resulting from protection of the area, showed the resilience of the system after prolonged disturbances. The sanctuary appears susceptible to continuing disturbances under the current management regime but at lower rates than in surrounding unprotected areas. The study demonstrates that remotely sensed land cover assessments can have important contributions to monitoring land management strategies, understanding processes underpinning land use changes and helping to inform future conservation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annaselvam, J., & Parthasarathy, R. (1999). Inventories of understory plants in tropical evergreen forest in Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. Ecotropica, 5, 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael, N., Costanza, R., Strand, I., Boyton, W., Bell, K., & Wagner, L. (1995). Ecological economic modelling and valuation of ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 14, 143–159. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(95)00026-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, M. A., Haggerty, P. K., Alvarez, R., De Jong, B. H. J., & Olmsted, I. (2000). Tropical Mexico’s recent land-use change: A region’s contribution to the global carbon cycle. Ecological Applications, 10, 1426–1441. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1426:TMSRLU]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cincotta, R. P., Wisnewski, J., & Engelman, R. (2000). Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature, 404, 990–992. doi:10.1038/35010105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. B., Spies, T. A., Alig, R. J., Oetter, D. R., Maiersperger, T. K., & Fiorella, M. (2002). Characterizing 23 years (1972–95) of stand replacement disturbance in western Oregon forests with Landsat imagery. Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.), 5, 122–137. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0060-X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congreve, C. R. T. (1938). The anamalais. Madras: Tamil Nadu Forest Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppin, P., Jonckhere, I., Nackarts, K., & Muys, B. (2004). Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(9), 1565–1596. doi:10.1080/0143116031000101675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS (2006). ERDAS Imagine tour guides, Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging, LLC.

  • FAO (2001). Global forest resources assessment 2000. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2001). What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence. Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium): LUCC International Project Office, LUCC Report Series no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience, 52, 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R. A. (1999). The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990. Tellus, 51(B), 298–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R., Cowen, D. J., Althausen, J. D., Narumalani, S., & Weathebee, O. (1993). An evaluation of the Coast watch change detection protocol in South Carolina. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 59, 1039–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, C. S., Dutt, C. B. S., & Bawa, K. S. (2000). Deforestation and land use changes in Western Ghats, India. Current Science, 79(2), 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S. (2008). Assessment of landcover dynamics and its conservation implications in tropical forests of Western Ghats, India. Paper presented at the conference on conservation Science, 25–27 March. Cambridge University.

  • Kalluri, S., Desch, A., Curry, T., Altstatt, A., Devers, D., Townshend, J. R. G., et al. (2001). Historical satellite data used to map Pan-Amazon forest cover. EOS Transactions, 82(18), 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. A., Singh, M., Srivastava, S. K., Udhayan, A., Kumar, H. N., & Sharma, A. K. (2002). Distribution patterns, relative abundance and management of mammals in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 99(2), 184–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brond’Zio, E., Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), 2365–2407. doi:10.1080/0143116031000139863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mausel, P., Wu, Y., Li, Y., Moran, E. F., & Brondizio, E. S. (1993). Spectral identification of successional stages following deforestation in the Amazon. Geocarto International, 4, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S., & Bawa, K. S. (1997). Application of GIS, remote sensing and landscape ecology approach to biodiversity conservation approach in the western ghats. Current Science, 73, 134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, S. C. (1991). The southern western ghats: A biodiversity conservation plan. India: International Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar, M. P. (1996). Hotspots of endemic plants of India. India: Tropical Botanic Garden Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Holben, B. (1986). Identifying deforestation in Brazil using multiresolution satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7, 429–448. doi:10.1080/01431168608954696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M., & Dinerstien, E. (1998). The global 200: A representative approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology, 12, 502–515. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski, B. C., Gage, S. H., & Long, D. T., & Cooper, W. E. (2000) A land transformation model for the Saginaw bay watershed. In J. Sanderson & L. D. Harris (Eds.), Landscape ecology—A top-down approach (pp. 162–178). Washington D. C.: Lewis Publishers.

  • Prasad, S. N., Vijayan, L., Balachandran, S., Ramachandran, V. S., & Verghese, C. P. A. (1998). Conservation planning for the Western Ghats of Kerala: I. A GIS approach for location of biodiversity hot spots. Current Science, 75(3), 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, B. R., & Pascal, J. P. (1997) Atlas of endemics of the Western Ghats (India). Institute Francias de Pondicherry.

  • Sader, S. A., Stone, T. A., & Joyce, A. T. (1990). Remote sensing of tropical forests: An overview of research and applications using non photographic sensors. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56, 1343–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajeev, T. K., Srivastava, S. K., Raphael, M. G., Dutt, S., Ramachandran, N. K., & Tyagi, P. C. (2002). Management of forests in India for biological diversity and forests productivity: A new perspective—volume III: Anamalai Conservation Area (ACA). WII-USDA Forest Service Collaborative Project Report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun.

  • Sandler, T. (1993). Tropical deforestation—Markets and market failures. Land Economics, 69(3), 225–233. doi:10.2307/3146589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Singh, A., Kant, S., Zhu, Z., & Waller, E. (2005). Integrating habitat status, human population pressure, and protection status into biodiversity conservation priority setting. Conservation Biology, 19, 1273–1285. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00225.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stibig, H.-J., & Achard, F. (2003). Assessment of tropical forest cover from satellite images at different geographical scales: Case studies from Southeast Asia. In P. S. Roy (Ed.), Geoinformatics for tropical ecosystems (pp. 33–48). Dehradun, India: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.

  • Sundararaju, R. (1987). Management plan for Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Chennai: Office of the Chief Wildlife Warden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, J. R. G., Bell, V., Desch, A., Havlicek, C., Justice, C., et al. (1995). The NASA Landsat pathfinder humid tropical deforestation project. In Proceedings of land satellite information in the next decade. ASPRS Conference, Vienna, pp IV 76–87.

  • Tunf, F., & Ellesworth, L. (1988). The determination of optimal threshold levels for change detection using various accuracy indices. Photogrammetric Engineering and remote Sensing, 54, 1449–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., Wear, D. N., & Flamm, R. O. (1996). Land ownership and land-cover change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Applications, 6, 1150–1172. doi:10.2307/2269599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, J. K. (1993). Saving the tropical forest. Needs and prognosis. Ambio, 22(4), 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wibowo, D. H., & Byron, R. N. (1999). Deforestation mechanisms—a survey. International Journal of Social Economics, 26, 455–474. doi:10.1108/03068299910230099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shijo Joseph.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joseph, S., Blackburn, G.A., Gharai, B. et al. Monitoring conservation effectiveness in a global biodiversity hotspot: the contribution of land cover change assessment. Environ Monit Assess 158, 169–179 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0571-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0571-4

Keywords

Navigation