Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to analyze the differences found in the results of noise mapping using two of the most popular software techniques for the prediction of environmental noise. The location selected to conduct the comparative study is an area encompassed by the ring road that surrounds the city of Pamplona and on a grid, with a total of 6 × 105 points, approximately. In fact, and as the Environmental Noise Directive points out, it is a major road designated by a Member State (Spain). Configuration of the calculation parameters (discretization of the sources, ground absorption, reflection order, etc.) was as equivalent as possible as far as programs allow. In spite of that, a great number of differences appear in the findings. Although in 95.5% of the points the difference in the noise level calculated from the two programs was less than 3 dB, this general statistic result concealed some great differences. These are due to the various algorithms that programs implement to evaluate noise levels. Most differences pertain to highly screened receivers or remote ones. In the former, the algorithm of visibility is the main cause of such differences. In the latter, differences are mainly brought about by a different implementation of the propagation under homogeneous and favorable atmospheric conditions from both software systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arana, M. (2001). Prediction of urban noise. In A. Garcia (Ed.), Environmental urban noise (pp. 149–181). Southampton: WITT. ISBN: 1-85312-752-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arana, M., & Aramendia, E. (2006). Comparison between raster factor and constant angular step in noise mapping. Paper presented at the 6th European conference on noise control Euronoise 2006, Tempere, Finland.

  • Arana, M., & Garcia, A. (1998). A social survey on the effects of environmental noise on the residents of Pamplona, Spain. Applied Acoustics, 53(4), 245–253. doi:10.1016/S0003-682X(97)00067-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arana, M., San Martin, M. L., Vela, A., & San Martin, R. (2003). Acoustic map of Pamplona, Spain. Percentile of people affected by environmental noise. In D. Almorza, C. A. Brebbia, & R. Hernandez (Eds.), Modelling and experimental measurements in acoustics (pp. 35–44). Southampton: WITT. ISBN: 1-85312-975-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadna/A v.3.6.118 (2005). DataKustik, instructions for use.

  • Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (2002).

  • ISO 9613 (1996). Acoustics—attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors—Part2: General method of calculation. Genève, Switzerland.

  • Ley 37/2003, de 17 de noviembre, del Ruido (2003). (in Spanish). B.O.E. n° 276, from http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2003/11/18/pdfs/A40494–40505.pdf.

  • Nouvelle Méthode de Prevision du Bruit NMPB-Routes (1997). (SETRA-CERTULCPC-CSTB).

  • Popp, C., & Bing, M. (2005). From noise mapping to action planning. Paper presented at the forum acusticum 2005, Budapest, Hungary.

  • SoundPLAN v.6.4 (2005). Braunstein + Berndt GmbH, Wins–User’s manual: Technical acoustics in SoundPLAN.

  • Steele, C. (2001). A critical review of some traffic noise prediction models. Applied Acoustics, 62(3), 271–287. doi:10.1016/S0003-682X(00)00030-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WG-AEN (2006). Good practice guide for strategic noise mapping and the production of associated data on noise exposure. European commission working group. Assessment of exposure to noise. Final draft v.2. Brussels, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/pdf/wg_aen.pdf.

  • Yilmaz, G., & Hocanli, Y. (2006). Mapping of noise by using GIS in Şanliurfa. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 121, 103–108. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9109-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Acoustics Laboratory, Physics Department, Public University of Navarre, Campus de Arrosadia, 31006, Pamplona, Spain

    M. Arana, R. San Martin, M. L. San Martin & E. Aramendía

Authors
  1. M. Arana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. San Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. L. San Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Aramendía
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Arana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arana, M., San Martin, R., San Martin, M.L. et al. Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages. Environ Monit Assess 163, 503–513 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0853-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0853-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation