Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uncertainty based optimal monitoring network design for a chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminated site

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An application of a newly developed optimal monitoring network for the delineation of contaminants in groundwater is demonstrated in this study. Designing a monitoring network in an optimal manner helps to delineate the contaminant plume with a minimum number of monitoring wells at optimal locations at a contaminated site. The basic principle used in this study is that the wells are installed where the measurement uncertainties are minimum at the potential monitoring locations. The development of the optimal monitoring network is based on the utilization of contaminant concentration data from an existing initial arbitrary monitoring network. The concentrations at the locations that were not sampled in the study area are estimated using geostatistical tools. The uncertainty in estimating the contaminant concentrations at such locations is used as design criteria for the optimal monitoring network. The uncertainty in the study area was quantified by using the concentration estimation variances at all the potential monitoring locations. The objective function for the monitoring network design minimizes the spatial concentration estimation variances at all potential monitoring well locations where a monitoring well is not to be installed as per the design criteria. In the proposed methodology, the optimal monitoring network is designed for the current management period and the contaminant concentration data estimated at the potential observation locations are then used as the input to the network design model. The optimal monitoring network is designed for the consideration of two different cases by assuming different initial arbitrary existing data. Three different scenarios depending on the limit of the maximum number of monitoring wells that can be allowed at any period are considered for each case. In order to estimate the efficiency of the developed optimal monitoring networks, mass estimation errors are compared for all the three different scenarios of the two different cases. The developed methodology is useful in coming up with an optimal number of monitoring wells within the budgetary limitations. The methodology also addresses the issue of redundancy, as it refines the existing monitoring network without losing much information of the network. The concept of uncertainty-based network design model is useful in various stages of a potentially contaminated site management such as delineation of contaminant plume and long-term monitoring of the remediation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chadalavada, S., & Datta, B. (2008). Dynamic optimal monitoring network for transient transport of pollutants in groundwater aquifers. Water Resources Management, 22(6), 651–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (1979). Practical geostatistics. Essex, England: Applied Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1988). Spatial prediction and ordinary kriging. Mathematical Geology, 20(2), 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, A., & Datta, B. (2007). Multiobjective design of dynamic monitoring networks for detection of groundwater pollution. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 133(2), 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangolli, S. (1999). The dictionary of substances and their effects. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollat, J. B., & Reed, P. M. (2006). Comparing state-of art evolutionary multi objective algorithms for long term monitoring network design. Advances in Water Resources, 29, 792–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loaiciga, H., et al. (1992). Review of ground-water quality monitoring network design. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118(1), 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, L. M., Cunha, M. C., Riberio, L., et al. (2004). Groundwater monitoring network optimization with redundancy reduction. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons and Brinkerhoff (2002). Edinburgh parks environment status report, Australia.

  • Reed, P., & Minsker, B. (2004). Striking the balance: Long term groundwater monitoring design for conflicting objectives. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130(1), 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. (2004). Optimal design of a groundwater monitoring network in Daqing, China. Environmental Geology, 45, 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zheng, C., Chien, C. C., Zheng, L., et al. (2006). A comparative study of Monto Carlo simple genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm for cost-effective sampling network design under uncertainty. Advances in Water Resources, 29, 899–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bithin Datta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chadalavada, S., Datta, B. & Naidu, R. Uncertainty based optimal monitoring network design for a chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminated site. Environ Monit Assess 173, 929–940 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1435-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1435-2

Keywords

Navigation