Abstract
Desertification, land degradation in arid, semi-arid, and dry sub-humid regions, is a global environmental problem. With respect to increasing importance of desertification and its complexity, the necessity of attention to the optimal de-desertification alternatives is essential. Therefore, this work presents an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to objectively select the optimal de-desertification alternatives based on the results of interviews with experts in Khezr Abad region, central Iran as the case study. This model was used in Yazd Khezr Abad region to evaluate the efficiency in presentation of better alternatives related to personal and environmental situations. Obtained results indicate that the criterion “proportion and adaptation to the environment” with the weighted average of 33.6% is the most important criterion from experts viewpoints. While prevention alternatives of land usage unsuitable of reveres and conversion with 22.88% mean weight and vegetation cover development and reclamation with 21.9% mean weight are recognized ordinarily as the most important de-desertification alternatives in region. Finally, sensitivity analysis is performed in detail by varying the objective factor decision weight, the priority weight of subjective factors, and the gain factors. After the fulfillment of sensitivity analysis and determination of the most sensitive criteria and alternatives, the former classification and ranking of alternatives does not change so much, and it was observed that unsuitable land use alternative with the preference degree of 22.7% was still in the first order of priority. The final priority of livestock grazing control alternative was replaced with the alternative of modification of ground water harvesting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armacost, R. L., & Hosseini, J. C. (1994). Identification of determinant attributes using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 383–392.
Azar, A., & Rajabzadeh, A. (2002). Applied decision making (1st ed., p. 185). Tehran: Negahe Danesh.
Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning. Illinois: Foresman.
Dregne, H. E., & Tucker, C. J. (1998). Desert encroachment. Desertification Control Bulletin, 16, 16–19.
Hammond, J. H., & Kelly, M. (1990). Note on facility location. Harvard Business School Press.
Hartman, A. (1981). Reaching consensus using the Delphi technique. Educational Leadership, 38(4), 495–497.
Hsu, P.-F., Wu, C.-R., & Li, Y.-T. (2007). Selection of infectious waste disposal firms by using the analytical hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis. Waste management, 22, 105–115.
Insua, M. (1997). Sensitivity analysis in the multiple criterion decision making (MODM) (p. 550). Cambridge University Press.
Masuda, T. (1990). Hierarchical sensitivity analysis of the priorities used in analytical hierarchy process. Systems Science, 21, 415–427.
Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436.
Rios Insua, D. (1990). Sensitivity analysis in multi-objective decision making. In: Lecture notes in economics and mathematical system (p. 420). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). How to mark a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). The analytic network process. RWS Publications: Expert Choice, Inc.
Sadeghi Ravesh, M. H., Ahmadi, H., Zehtabian, G. h., & Tahmores, M. (2010). Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in assessment of de-desertification alternatives, case study: Khezrabad region, Yazd province. Marta & Biaban Journal, 17(1), 35–50.
Sung, W. C. (2001). Application of Delphi method, a qualitative and quantitative analysis, to the healthcare management. Journal of Healthcare Management, 2(2), 11–20.
Triantaphyllou, E., & Sanchez, A. (1997). A sensitivity analysis approach for deterministic multi-criteria decision making methods. Decision Sciences, 28, 151–194.
UNEP (1992). United nations environmental program. World atlas of desertification (editorial commentary by N. Middleton and D.S.G. Thomas). Arnold, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
These paper is a part of Ph.D. thesis in environmental management entitled “the research of desertification effective factors in environment destroy”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadeghi Ravesh, M.H., Ahmadi, H. & Zehtabian, G. Application of sensitivity analysis for assessment of de-desertification alternatives in the central Iran by using Triantaphyllou method. Environ Monit Assess 179, 31–46 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1717-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1717-8