Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing possible visitor-use impacts on water quality in Yosemite National Park, California

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is concern that visitor-use associated activities, such as bathing, dish washing, wastewater production, and stock animal use near lakes and streams, could cause degradation of water quality in Yosemite National Park. A study was conducted during 2004–2007 to assess patterns in nutrient and Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentrations in the Merced and Tuolumne Rivers and characterize natural background concentrations of nutrients in the park. Results indicated that nutrient and E. coli concentrations were low, even compared to other undeveloped sites in the United States. A multiple linear regression approach was used to model natural background concentrations of nutrients, with basin characteristics as explanatory variables. Modeled nitrogen concentrations increased with elevation, and modeled phosphorus concentrations increased with basin size. Observed concentrations (±uncertainty) were compared to modeled concentrations (±uncertainty) to identify sites that might be impacted by point sources of nutrients, as indicated by large model residuals. Statistically significant differences in observed and modeled concentrations were observed at only a few locations, indicating that most sites were representative of natural background conditions. The empirical modeling approach used in this study can be used to estimate natural background conditions at any point along a study reach in areas minimally impacted by development, and may be useful for setting water-quality standards in many national parks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon, J., Roche, J., Elliott, C., & Nicholas, N. (2006). VERP: Putting principles into practice in Yosemite National Park. The George Wright Forum, 23, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R., & Short, T. M. (1999). Biological, habitat, and water quality conditions in the upper Merced River drainage, Yosemite National Park, California, 1993–1996 (p. 56). U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4088.

  • Clark, G. M., Mueller, D. K., & Mast, M. A. (2000). Nutrient concentrations and yields in undeveloped basins of the United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36, 849–860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clow, D. W. (2010). Changes in the timing of snowmelt and streamflow in Colorado: A response to recent warming. Journal of Climate, 23, 2293–2306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clow, D. W., Mast, M. A., & Campbell, D. H. (1996). Controls on surface water chemistry in the upper Merced River basin, Yosemite National Park, California. Hydrological Processes, 10, 727–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbert, J. C., Embrey, S. S., Black, R. W., Tesoriero, A. J., & Haggland, A. L. (2000). Water quality in the Puget Sound basin, Washington and British Columbia, 1996–98 (p. 31). U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1216.

  • Efron, B. (1981). Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 9, 139–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap: Monographs on statistics and applied probability (p. 456). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graefe, A., Kuss, F., & Vaske, J. (1990). Visitor impact management: The planning framework (p. 100). National Parks Conservation Association.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed., p. 928). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsel, D. R., & Hirsch, R. M. (1992). Statistical methods in water resources (p. 522). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsel, D. R., Mueller, D. K., & Slack, J. R. (2005). Computer program for the Kendall family of trend tests (p. 13). U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report.

  • Hof, M., & Lime, D. (1997). Visitor experience and resource protection framework in the national park system: Rationale, current status, and future direction. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-GTR-371.

  • Hoffman, R. J., Dong, A. E., & Keeter, G. L. (1976). Water-quality study of a reach of the Merced River in Yosemite National Park and vicinity, California, April 1973 through September 1974 (p. 66). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 76-326.

  • Hoos, A. B., Garrett, J. W., & Knight, R. R. (2002). Water quality of the Flint River basin, Alabama and Tennessee, 1999–2000 (p. 46). U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 01-4185.

  • Huber, N. K., Bateman, P. C., & Wahrhaftig, C. (1989). Geologic map of Yosemite National Park and vicinity, California. U.S. Geological Survey, 1:125,000.

  • Kachigan, S. K. (1986). Statistical analysis (p. 589). New York: Radius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. P., & Moeschberger, M. L. (1997). Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data (p. 556). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madej, M. A., Weaver, W. E., & Hagans, D. K. (1994). Analysis of bank erosion on the Merced River, Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Environmental Management, 18, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. K., & Spahr, N. E. (2006). Nutrients in streams and rivers across the nation—1992–2001 (p. 44). U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5107.

  • National Park Service (1997). Visitor experience and resource protection (VERP) framework: A handbook for planners and managers (p. 108). National Park Service.

  • Peavler, R. S. (2008). Design and implementation of a water-quality monitoring program in support of establishing user capacities in Yosemite National Park (p. 101). Masters thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.

  • Peters, N. E. (1994). Water-quality variations in a forested Piedmont catchment, Georgia, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 156, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohm, C. M., Omernik, J. M., Woods, A. J., & Stoddard, J. L. (2002). Regional characteristics of nutrient concentrations in streams and their application to nutrient criteria development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38, 213–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shacklette, H. T., Hamilton, J. C., Boerngen, J. G., & Bowles, J. M. (1971). Elemental composition of surficial materials in the conterminous United States (p. 71). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 574-D.

  • Smith, R. A., Alexander, R. B., & Schwarz, G. E. (2003). Natural background concentrations of nutrients in streams and rivers of the conterminous United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 3039–3047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, S. K., & Hoffman, R. J. (1981). Water-quality assessment of the Merced River, California, in the 1977 water year (p. 37). U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 80-75.

  • Stankey, G. H., Cole, D. N., Lucas, R. C., Petersen, M. E., & Frissell, S. S. (1985). The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning (p. 37). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report INT-176.

  • Stoeckel, D. M., Mathes, M. V., Hyer, K. E., Hagedorn, C., Kater, H., Lukasik, J., et al. (2004). Comparison of seven protocols to identify fecal contamination sources using Escherichia coli. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 6109–6117. doi:10.1021/es0354519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsihrintzis, V. A., & Hamid, R. (1997). Modeling and management of urban stormwater runoff quality: A review. Water Resources Management, 11, 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1986). Ambient water quality criteria for bacteria, 1986 (p. 18). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA 440/5-84-002.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000a). Ambient water quality criteria recommendations: Rivers and streams in nutrient ecoregion II (p. 39). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA-822-B-00-015.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:2000b

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000b). Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual, rivers and streams (p. 253). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA-822-B00-002.

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2011). National field manual for the collection of water-quality data. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations Book 9, chapters A1–A9. Available online at http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A.

  • Wetzel, K. F. (2003). Runoff production processes in small alpine catchments within the unconsolidated Pleistocene sediments of the Lainbach area (Upper Bavaria). Hydrologic Processes, 17, 2463–2483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R. R. (2005). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (p. 608). Elsevier.

  • Zaugg, S. D., Smith, S. G., & Schroeder, M. P. (2006). Determination of wastewater compounds in whole water by continuous liquid–liquid extraction and capillary-column gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Book 5, Chapter 4. Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2006/05B04.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Clow.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 41.0 KB)

(DOC 34.5 KB)

(XLS 40.0 KB)

(EPS 735 KB)

(EPS 409 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clow, D.W., Peavler, R.S., Roche, J. et al. Assessing possible visitor-use impacts on water quality in Yosemite National Park, California. Environ Monit Assess 183, 197–215 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-1915-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-1915-z

Keywords

Navigation