Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in water quality in agricultural catchments after deployment of wastewater treatment plant

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insufficient wastewater remediation in small communities and nonpoint source pollution are the key factors in determining the water quality of small streams in an agricultural landscape. Despite the current extensive construction of municipal wastewater treatment facilities in small communities, the level of organic substances and nutrients in the recipient catchments has not decreased in many areas. This paper analyzes the changes in the water quality of the small streams after the deployment of wastewater treatment plants that were designed to address sources of pollution from small municipalities. The analysis is based on the results from a water quality monitoring network in the small watersheds in the Czech Republic. Five rural catchments with one dominant municipal pollution source, where a wastewater treatment plant was deployed during the monitoring period, were selected according to a predefined set of criteria, from a series of 317 profiles. Basic water quality indicators were selected for the assessment: O2, BOD-5, COD, TOC, conductivity, NH4-N, NO2-N, NO3-N, PT, and PO4-P. Results of the analysis showed that the simple deployment of the water treatment facilities at these streams often did not lead to a reduction of contamination in the streams. The expected post-deployment changes, namely, a significant and permanent reduction of stream contamination, occurred only in one catchment, whereas in the remainder of the catchments, only marginal changes or even increased concentrations of the contaminants were detected. As the critical factors that determined the efficiency of wastewater treatment were studied, the need for the consideration of the local conditions during the design of the facility, particularly regarding the size of the catchments, initial level of contamination, proper system of operation, and process optimization of the treatment facility, emerged as the important factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alamets, K., Bicanová, M., Judová, P., Pärnamets, H., Ronczyk, L., & Rödlová, S. (2004). Water quality changes and its trends in the Czech Republic. Geografie, 109(2), 181–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARBA. (2011). Monitoring of water quality on small streams database. Prague: Agricultural River Basin Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barjenbruch, M., & Exner, E. (2012). Comparative study of small wastewater treatment technologies under special operation conditions—COMPAS. Desalination and Water Treatment, 39(1–3), 278–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti, L., Dirckx, G., Bixio, D., Thoeye, C., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2008). Environmental and economic performance assessment of the integrated urban wastewater system. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1262–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, H., Kornmilch, M., Opitz, D., Schmoll, O., & Scholz, G. (2002). Estimation of the nutrient inputs into river systems—experiences from German rivers. Regional Environmental Change, 3(1–3), 107–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boller, M. (1997). Small wastewater treatment plants—a challenge to wastewater engineers. Water Science and Technology, 35(6), 1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B., Daigger, G., Rubin, R., & Tchobanoglous, G. (2002). Evaluation of onsite wastewater treatment technologies using sustainable development criteria. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 4, 87–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brion, N., Billen, G., Guézennec, L., & Ficht, A. (2000). Distribution of nitrifying activity in the Seine River (France) from Paris to the estuary. Estuaries and Coasts, 23(5), 669–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CHMI (2012). Arrow—surface water quality monitoring database. Czech Hydrometeorological Institute. http://hydro.chmi.cz/isarrow/index.php?lng=eng. Accessed 25 Jul 2012

  • CSO (2012). Czech Statistical Office—public database. http://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo/en/uvod.jsp. Accessed 10 Aug 2012

  • De Wit, M., & Behrendt, H. (1999). Nitrogen and phosphorus emissions from soil to surface water in the rhine and elbe basins. Water Science and Technology, 39(1), 109–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities 22(12), 2000.

  • EEA. (1998). Oxygen demand at river stations by river size and catchment type. Distribution (vol. 5, pp. 1–16). EEA: Copenhagen.

  • EEA (2001). Nitrogen and phosphorus in river stations by river size and catchment type. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ammonium-concentrations-in-rivers. Accessed 21 Jun 2012

  • EEA (2012). CORINE landcover database. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-landcover. Accessed 2 Jun 2012

  • Finnegan, C. J., Van Egmond, R. A., Price, O. R., & Whelan, M. J. (2009). Continuous-flow laboratory simulation of stream water quality changes downstream of an untreated wastewater discharge. Water Research, 43(7), 1993–2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fučík, P., Lexa, M., & Novák, P. (2008). Assessing the stream water quality dynamics in connection with land use in agricultural catchments of different scales. Soil and Water, 2008(3), 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J., Mujeriego, R., Obis, J. M., & Bou, J. (2001). Wastewater treatment for small communities in Catalonia (Mediterranean region). Water Policy, 3(4), 341–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gašpariková, E., Kapusta, Š., Bodίk, I., Derco, J., & Kratochvíl, K. (2005). Evaluation of anaerobic-aerobic wastewater treatment plant operations. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 14(1), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, B. E., Storm, D. E., & Stanley, E. H. (2001). Effect of a point source input on stream nutrient retention. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(5), 1291–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hering, D., Borja, A., Carstensen, J., Carvalho, L., Elliott, M., Feld, C. K., et al. (2010). The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment, 408(19), 4007–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judová, P., & Janský, B. (2005). Water quality in rural areas of the Czech Republic: key study Slapanka River catchment. Limnologica, 35(3), 160–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knauer, N., & Mander, Ü. (1989). Untersuchungen über die Filterwirkung verschiedener Saumbiotope an Gewässern in Schleswig-Holstein. 1. Mitteilung: Filterung von Stickstoffund Phosphor. Zeitschrift füer Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung, 30, 365–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhammer, J. (2010). Water quality changes in the Elbe River basin, Czech Republic, in the context of the post-socialist economic transition. GeoJournal, 75(2), 185–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langhammer, J., Hartvich, F., Mattas, D., Rödlová, S., & Zbořil, A. (2012). The variability of surface water quality indicators in relation to watercourse typology, Czech Republic. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(6), 3983–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Line, D. E. (2013). Effect of development on water quality for seven streams in North Carolina. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-3024-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. B., & Chen, D. M. (2009). Spatial impact of organic matters from point sources on stream water quality. Mining Science and Technology (China), 19(2), 256–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, E., Aumatell, J., Godé, L., Poch, M., & Sabater, F. (2004). Nutrient retention efficiency in streams receiving inputs from wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Quality, 33(1), 285–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massoud, M. A., Tareen, J., Tarhini, A., Nasr, J., & Jurdi, M. (2010). Effectiveness of wastewater management in rural areas of developing countries: a case of Al-Chouf Caza in Lebanon. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 161(1–4), 61–69.

  • Meloun, M., & Militky, J. (2011). Statistical data analysis: a practical guide (p. 800). Sawston: Woodhead Publishing, Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merseburger, G. C., Martí, E., & Sabater, F. (2005). Net changes in nutrient concentrations below a point source input in two streams draining catchments with contrasting land uses. Science of the Total Environment, 347, 217–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, S. C., & Von Sperling, M. (2008). Reliability analysis of wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 42(4), 1182–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OPE (2012). The Operational Programme “Environment”, Czech Republic. A guide to grants under the Operational Programme “Environment”. http://en.opzp.cz/sekce/510/priority-axis-4/. Accessed 11 May 2012

  • Peterson, B. J., Wollheim, W. M., Mulholland, P. J., Webster, J. R., Meyer, J. L., Tank, J. L., et al. (2001). Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by head water streams. Science, 292(5514), 86–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitter, P. (1999). Hydrochemie. VŠCHT, Praha. 568 pp. [Hydrochemistry, in Czech]

  • Rödlová, S. (2006). Surface water quality in small catchment areas after the construction of wastewater treatment plants. Publicationes Instituti Geographica Universitatis Tartuensis, 101(1), 106–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, A. N., Rekolainen, S., Tunney, H., Carton, O. T., Brookes, P. C., Johnston, A. E. (1997). Phosphorus in agriculture and its environmental implications. Phosphorus loss from soil to water. Proceedings of a workshop, Wexford, Irish Republic, 29–31 September 1995. (pp. 1–53). Cab International.

  • Siegl, A., Bruch, I., Mühl, M. (1997). Gestaltung von Abwasserbehandlungsanlagen im ländlichen Raum: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung landschaftsökologischer Gesichtspunkte und der Erstellung von Planungs-, Bewertungs- und Entscheidungshilfen. Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser (LAWA). Abschlußbericht Projekt A (vol. 5, p. 155). Saarbrücken: Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie und Verkehr des Saarlandes.

  • Sojka, J. (2004). Malé čistírny odpadních vod. Brno: ERA. 98 pp. [Small wastewater treatment plants, in Czech]

  • Soo, S. S. T., Toh, E. L., Yap, K. K. K., Ng, D. K. S., & Foo, D. C. Y. (2013). Synthesis of distributed wastewater treatment networks for one- and two-contaminant systems. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 91, 106–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sýkora, L., & Ouředníček, M. (2007). Sprawling post-communist metropolis: commercial and residential suburbanization in Prague and Brno, the Czech Republic. In E. Razin, M. Dijst, & C. Vazquez (Eds.), Employment deconcentration in European metropolitan areas market forces versus planning regulations (Vol. 91, pp. 209–233). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thyssen, N. (2001). Rivers in the European Union: water quality, status and trends. River restoration in Europe. In: H.J. Nijland & M.J.R. Cals (Eds.) Practical approaches, conference on river restoration—proceedings (pp. 66–71). Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  • Wagner, I., & Zalewski, M. (2009). Ecohydrology as a basis for the sustainable city strategic planning: focus on Lodz, Poland. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 8(3), 209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. P., & Smith, R. (1994). Design of distributed effluent treatment systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 49, 3127–45. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(94)E0126-B.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WRI (2012). HEIS—Hydroecological Information System, Water Research Institute, Prague. http://www.chmi.cz/portal/dt?portal_lang=en&nc=1&menu=JSPTabContainer/P1_0_Home. Accessed 18 Jun 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this paper was supported by Charles University in Prague Research Center UNCE 204003/2012 and by Research Program PRVOUK P43 with the support of Research Plan MSM 0021620831 (“Geographic Systems and Risk Processes in the context of global changes and European integration”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 6, Prague 2, 128 43, Czech Republic

    Jakub Langhammer & Sylva Rödlová

Authors
  1. Jakub Langhammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sylva Rödlová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Langhammer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langhammer, J., Rödlová, S. Changes in water quality in agricultural catchments after deployment of wastewater treatment plant. Environ Monit Assess 185, 10377–10393 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3339-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3339-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation