Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannons entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flooding is a very common worldwide natural hazard causing large-scale casualties every year; Iran is not immune to this thread as well. Comprehensive flood susceptibility mapping is very important to reduce losses of lives and properties. Thus, the aim of this study is to map susceptibility to flooding by different bivariate statistical methods including Shannon’s entropy (SE), statistical index (SI), and weighting factor (Wf). In this regard, model performance evaluation is also carried out in Haraz Watershed, Mazandaran Province, Iran. In the first step, 211 flood locations were identified by the documentary sources and field inventories, of which 70% (151 positions) were used for flood susceptibility modeling and 30% (60 positions) for evaluation and verification of the model. In the second step, ten influential factors in flooding were chosen, namely slope angle, plan curvature, altitude, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream power index (SPI), distance from river, rainfall, geology, land use, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). In the next step, flood susceptibility maps were prepared by these four methods in ArcGIS. As the last step, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for quantitative assessment of each model. The results showed that the best model to estimate the susceptibility to flooding in Haraz Watershed was SI model with the prediction and success rates of 99.71 and 98.72%, respectively, followed by Wf and SE models with the AUC values of 98.1 and 96.57% for the success rate, and 97.6 and 92.42% for the prediction rate, respectively. In the SI and Wf models, the highest and lowest important parameters were the distance from river and geology. Flood susceptibility maps are informative for managers and decision makers in Haraz Watershed in order to contemplate measures to reduce human and financial losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgun, A. (2012). A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression multi criteria decision and likelihood ratio methods a case study at İzmir Turkey. Landslides, 9(1), 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee, O. F., Pradhan, B., Park, H. J., & Lee, J. H. (2014). A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena, 114, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asgharizadeh, E., & Nasrolahi, M. (2006). Comparison between fuzzy and Shannon entropy by PROMETHEE model for Iran-Khodro company (Saipa), The 4th International Management Conference. In Persian

  • Bahremand, A., De Smedt, F., Corluy, J., Liu, Y., Poorova, J., Velcicka, L., & Kunikova, E. (2007). WetSpa model application for assessing reforestation impacts on floods in Margecany-Hornad Watershed, Slovakia. Water Resources Management, 21(8), 1373–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik, M., Magulová, B., Matys, M., & Marschalko, M. (2010). Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kralˇovany–Liptovsky’ Mikuláš railway case study. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 35(3), 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botzen, W., Aerts, J., & van den Bergh, J. (2013). Individual preferences for reducing flood risk to near zero through elevation. Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change, 18, 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cevik, E., & Topal, T. (2003). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline Hendek Turkey. Environmental Geology, 44(8), 949–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang-Jo, F., & Fabbri, A. G. (2003). Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Natural Hazards, 30(3), 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. R., Yeh, C. H., & Yu, B. (2011). Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for flood risk assessment and flood plain management in Taiwan. Natural Hazards, 59(3), 1261–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. F., Fabbri, A. G., & van Western, C. (1995). Multivariate regression analysis for landslide susceptibility zonation. In A. Carrara & F. Guzzetti (Eds.), Geographical information system in assessing natural hazards (pp. 107–133). Dordrechat: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, H., & Pappenberger, F. (2009). Ensemble flood forecasting: a review. Journal of Hydrology, 375(3), 613–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, F. C., & Lee, C. F. (2002). Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology, 42, 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moel, H., & Aerts, J. (2011). Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Natural Hazards, 58, 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkhrachy, I. (2015). Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite image and GIS tools: a case study of Najran city, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia KSA. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18, 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felicisimo, A., Cuartero, A., Remondo, J., & Quiros, E. (2012). Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-012-0320-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gashaw, W., & Legesse, D. )2011). Flood hazard and risk assessment using GIS and remote sensing in Fogera Woreda, Northwest Ethiopia, Nile River Basin. Springer Netherlands 179–206

  • Glade, T. (1998). Establishing the frequency and magnitude of landslide-triggering rainstorm events in New Zealand. Environmental Geology, 35, 160e–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E., Morino, K., Nagler, P., Murray, R., Pearlstein, S., & Hultine, K. (2012). Roles of saltcedar Tamarix spp. and capillary rise in salinizing a non-flooding terrace on a flow-regulated desert river. Journal of Arid Environment, 79, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu, C., Sonmez, H., Nefeslioglu, H. A., Duman, T. Y., & Can, T. (2005). The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Engineering Geology, 81, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinpoor Milaghardan, A., & Abbaspoor, R. A. (2015). Improving landslide prediction results using Shannon entropy theory. Journal Hazards Sciences, 1(2), 253–268 (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaafari, A., Najafi, A., Pourghasemi, H. R., Rezaeian, J., & Sattarian, A. (2014). GIS-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Caspian forest, northern Iran. International Journal Environmental Science and Technology, 11(4), 909–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., & Arnold, J. G. (2005). Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management. Hydrological Processes, 19, 749–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebur, M. N., Pradhan, B., & Tehrany, M. S. (2013). Using ALOS PALSAR derived high resolution DInSAR to detect slow-moving landslides in tropical forest: Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Geomatics, Natural Hazard and Risk, 1–19. doi:10.1080/19475705.2013.860407.

  • Jebur, M. N., Pradhan, B., & Tehrany, M. S. (2014). Optimization of landslide causative factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale. Remote Sensing of Environment, 152, 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakis, N., Kougias, l., & Patsialis, T. (2015). Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: application in Rhodope-Evros region, Greece. Science of the Total Environment. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi, K., Nohani, E., Maroufinia, E., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2016). A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Natural Hazards, 83(2), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kia, M. B., Pirasteh, S., Pradhan, B., Mahmud, A. R., Sulaiman, W. N. A., & Moradi, A. (2012). An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River basin, Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67, 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konadu, D., & Fosu, C. (2009). Digital elevation models and GIS for watershed modelling and flood prediction—a case study of Accra Ghana, In Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Protection in the Developing World. Springer, pp. 325–332.

  • Kourgialas, N. N., & Karatzas, G. P. (2011). Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas—a case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(2), 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Ryu, J. H., & Kim, I. S. (2007). Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides, 4, 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.J., Kang, J.E., & Jeon, S. (2012). Application of frequency ratio model and validation for predictive flooded area susceptibility mapping using GIS. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Munich. 895–898

  • Li, X. H., Zhang, Q., Shao, M., & Li, Y.L. (2012). A comparison of parameter estimation for distributed hydrological modelling using automatic and manual methods. Advanced Materials Research, 356–360, 2372–2375.

  • Liu, Y.B., & De Smedt, F. (2004). WetSpa extension, a GIS-based hydrologic model for flood prediction and watershed management. Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Vrije Universiteit Brussel: Brussels.

  • Liu, Y., & De Smedt, F. (2005). Flood modeling for complex terrain using GIS and remote sensed information. Water Resources Management, 19, 605–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Nancy, A. D. (1988). The dimensions of residential. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, Q., Miao, F., Zhen, J., Wang, X., Wang, A., Peng, Y., & Fan, Q. (2015). GIS based landslide susceptibility mapping with logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and combined fuzzy and support vector machine methods: a case study from Wolong Giant Panda Natural Reserve, China. Bulletin Engineering Geology and the Environment. doi:10.1007/s10064-015-0786-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammady, M., Pourghasemi, H. R., & Pradhan, B. (2012). Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster–Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. Journal of Asian Earth Science, 61, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R. (1994). Road surface drainage, channel initiation, and slope instability. Water Resources Research, 30, 1925–1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghibi, S. A., Pourghasemi, H. R., Pourtaghi, Z. S., & Rezaei, A. (2014). Groundwater qanat potential mapping using frequency ratio and Shannon’s entropy models in the Moghan Watershed, Iran. Earth Science Informatics. doi:10.1007/s12145-014-0145-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nampak, H., Pradhan, B., & Manap, M. A. (2014). Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation. Journal of Hydrology, 513, 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H. J., & Lee, S. (2010). Cross-validation of logistic regression model for landslide susceptibility mapping at Geneoung areas, Korea. Disaster Advance, 3, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H. J., & Pradhan, B. (2011). Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Computer and Geosciences, 37, 1264–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oztekin, B., & Topal, T. (2005). GIS-based detachment susceptibility analyses of a cut slope in limestone, Ankara-Turkey. Environmental Geology, 49, 124–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plate, E. J. (2009). HESS opinions: classification of hydrological models for flood management. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 1939–1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi, H. R., & Kerle, N. (2016). Random forest-evidential belief function based landslide susceptibility assessment in western Mazandaran Province, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 185. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4950-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi, H. R., Mohammadi, M., & Pradhan, B. (2012a). Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models at Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena, 97, 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi, H. R., Pradhan, B., & Gokceoglu, C. (2012b). Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Natural Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi, H.R., Pradhan, B., & Gokceoglu, C. (2012c). Remote sensing data derived parameters and its use in landslide susceptibility assessment using Shannon’s entropy and GIS. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 225, 486–491.

  • Pourghasemi, H. R., Moradi, H., & Fatemi Aghda, S. M. (2013). Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances. Natural Hazards, 69, 749–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B. (2009). Groundwater potential zonation for basaltic watersheds using satellite remote sensing data and GIS techniques. Central European Journal of geoscience, 1(1), 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B. (2010a). Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 9, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B. (2010b). Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. Journal of Indian Society Remote Sensing, 38, 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010). Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60, 1037–1054.

  • Rautela, P., & Lakhera, R. C. (2000). Landslide risk analysis between Giri and Tons Rivers in Himachal Himalaya (India). International Journal Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2, 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarhadi, A., Soltan, S., & Modarres, R. (2012). Probabilistic flood inundation mapping of ungauged rivers: linking GIS techniques and frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 458, 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanze, J., (2006). Flood risk management –a basic framework. In J. Schanze, E. Zehman, J. Marsalek (Eds.), Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures, pp. 1--20.

  • Sharma, L. P., Patel, N., Ghose, M. K., & Debnath, P. (2013). Synergistic application of fuzzy logic and geo-informatics for landslide vulnerability zonation—a case study in Sikkim Himalayas, India. Applied Geomatics. doi:10.1007/s12518-013-0115-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirzadi, A., Lee, S., Joo, O. H., & Chapi, K. (2012). A GIS-based logistic regression model in rock-fall susceptibility mapping along a mountainous road: Salavat Abad case study, Kurdistan, Iran. Natural Hazards, 64, 1639–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2013). Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree DT and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 504, 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2014a). Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany, M. S., Lee, M. J., Pradhan, B., Jebur, M. N., & Lee, S. (2014b). Flood susceptibility mapping using integrated bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environmental Earth Sciences, 72(10), 4001–4015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2015a). Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29, 1149–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., Mansor, S. H., & Ahmad, N. (2015b). Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena, 125, 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui, D., Lofman, O., Revhaug, I., & Dick, O. (2011). Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Natural Hazards, 59, 1413–1444.

  • Tierney, K. J., Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Westen, C. (1997). Statistical landslide hazard analysis. ILWIS 2.1 for Windows application guide (pp. 73–84). Enschede: ITC Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, S. (2009). A spatial decision support system for extracting the core factors and thresholds for landslide susceptibility map. Engineering Geology, 108, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., & Sidle, R. C. (1995). A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins. Water Resources Research, 31, 2097–2110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin, A. (2008). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena, 72, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin, A., Reis, S., Aydinoglu, A. C., & Yomralioglu, T. (2011). A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena, 85(3), 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Qiao J, & Zhang X (2010). Regional landslide zonation based on entropy method in three Gorges Area, China. 2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2010),1336–1339.

  • Yesilnacar, E.K. (2005). The application of computational intelligence to landslide susceptibility mapping in Turkey. Ph.D Thesis Department of Geomatics the University of Melbourne 423 pp.

  • Youssef, A. M., Pradhan, B., Jebur, M. N., & El-Harbi, H. M. (2014). Landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in Fayfa area, Saudi Arabi. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 3745–3761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, A. M., Pradhan, B., & Sefry, S. A. (2016). Flash flood susceptibility assessment in Jeddah city (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) using bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(12). doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4830-8.

  • Yufeng, S., & Fengxiang, J. (2009). Landslide stability analysis based on generalized information entropy. International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology 83–85.

  • Zhang, G., Cai, Y., Zheng, Z., Zhen, J., Liu, Y., & Huang., K. (2016). Integration of the statistical index method and the analytic hierarchy process technique for the assessment of landslide susceptibility in Huizhou, China. Catena, 142, 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the primary version of the manuscript. Also, we are extremely grateful to Prof. Dr. Frederick W. Kutz (associate editor, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment) for adding positive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Reza Pourghasemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khosravi, K., Pourghasemi, H.R., Chapi, K. et al. Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannons entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ Monit Assess 188, 656 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5665-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5665-9

Keywords

Navigation