Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple linear regression and regression with time series error models in forecasting PM10 concentrations in Peninsular Malaysia

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frequent haze occurrences in Malaysia have made the management of PM10 (particulate matter with aerodynamic less than 10 μm) pollution a critical task. This requires knowledge on factors associating with PM10 variation and good forecast of PM10 concentrations. Hence, this paper demonstrates the prediction of 1-day-ahead daily average PM10 concentrations based on predictor variables including meteorological parameters and gaseous pollutants. Three different models were built. They were multiple linear regression (MLR) model with lagged predictor variables (MLR1), MLR model with lagged predictor variables and PM10 concentrations (MLR2) and regression with time series error (RTSE) model. The findings revealed that humidity, temperature, wind speed, wind direction, carbon monoxide and ozone were the main factors explaining the PM10 variation in Peninsular Malaysia. Comparison among the three models showed that MLR2 model was on a same level with RTSE model in terms of forecasting accuracy, while MLR1 model was the worst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afroz, R., Hassan, M. N., Ibrahim, N. A., et al. (2003). Review of air pollution and health impacts in Malaysia. Environmental Research, 92(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-9351(02)00059-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Afzali, A., Rashid, M., Sabariah, B., Ramli, M., et al. (2014). PM10 pollution: its prediction and meteorological influence in PasirGudang, Johor. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Sciences, 18.

  • Bhattacharjee, H., Drescher, M., Good, T., Hartley, Z., Leza, J-D., Lin, B., Moss, J., Massey, R., Nishino, T., Ryder, S., Sachs, N., Tozan, Y., Taylor, C., & Wu, D. (1999). Section 1: Introduction. In Particulate matter in New Jersey. Princeton: Princeton University.

  • DOE Department of Environment. (2000). A guide to Air Pollution Index (API) in Malaysia. Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment.

  • DOE Department of the Environment (2015). Malaysia Environmental Quality Report 2014. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Malaysia.

  • DOE Department of the Environment (2017). Air quality standards: new Malaysia ambient air quality standard. https://www.doe.gov.my/portalv1/en/info-umum/english-air-quality-trend/108. Assessed 24 Feb 2017.

  • Hassan, N. A., Hashim, Z., Hashim, J. H., et al. (2016). Impact of climate change on air quality and public health in urban areas. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 28(2S), 38S–48S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539515592951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junninen, H., Niska, H., Tuppurainen, K., Ruuskanen, J., Kolehmainen, M., et al. (2004). Methods for imputation of missing values in air quality data sets. Atmospheric Environment, 38(18), 2895–2907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liew, J., Latif, M. T., Tangang, F. T., et al. (2011). Factors influencing the variations of PM10 aerosol dust in Klang Valley, Malaysia during the summer. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 4370–4378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P.-W. G. (2009). Simulation of the daily average PM10 concentrations at Ta-Liao with Box-Jenkins time series models and multivariate analysis. Atmospheric Environment, 43(13), 2104–2113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1985). Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs (2nd ed.). Homewood, Illinois: R. D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norazian, M. N., Ahmad Shukri, Y., Nor Azam, R., Al Bakri, A. M. M., et al. (2008). Estimation of missing values in air pollution data using single imputation techniques. ScienceAsia, 34(3), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2008.34.341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaadan, N., Jemain, A. A., Latif, M. T., Mohd Deni, S., et al. (2015). Anomaly detection and assessment of PM10 functional data at several locations in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 6(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2015.040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaharuddin, M., Zaharim, A., Mohd Nor, M. J., Karim, O. A., Sopian, K., et al. (2008). Application of wavelet transform on airborne suspended particulate matter and meteorological temporal variations. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 4(2), 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siwek, K., & Osowski, S. (2012). Improving the accuracy of prediction of PM10 pollution by the wavelet transformation and an ensemble of neural predictors. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(6), 1246–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2011.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ul-Saufie, A. Z., Yahaya, A. S., Ramli, N. A., Rosaida, N., Abdul Hamid, H., et al. (2013). Future daily PM10 concentrations prediction by combining regression models and feedforward backpropagation models with principle component analysis (PCA). Atmospheric Environment, 77, 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vinceti, M., Malagoli, C., Malavolti, M., Cherubini, A., Maffeis, G., Rodolfi, R., Heck, J. E., Astolfi, G., Calzolari, E., Nicolini, F., et al. (2016). Does maternal exposure to benzene and PM10 during pregnancy increase the risk of congenital anomalies? A population-based case-control study. Science of the Total Environment, 541, 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO World Health Organization. (2006). WHO Air Quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: Global update 2005, Summary of risk assessment.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Malaysia Department of Environment (DOE) for providing data to accomplish this study.

Funding

We would like to extend our gratitude to Universiti Sains Malaysia for Fellowship Scheme and Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education for financial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kar Yong Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, K.Y., Awang, N. Multiple linear regression and regression with time series error models in forecasting PM10 concentrations in Peninsular Malaysia. Environ Monit Assess 190, 63 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6419-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6419-z

Keywords

Navigation