Abstract
For a long time, watershed models focused on the transport of chemicals from the terrestrial part of the watershed to the surface water bodies by leaching and erosion. After the substances had reached the surface water, they were routed through the channel network often without any further transformation. Today, there is a need to extend watershed models with in-stream processes to bring them closer to natural conditions and to enhance their usability as support tools for water management and water quality policies. This paper presents experience with implementing in-stream processes in a ecohydrological dynamic watershed model and its application on the large scale in the Saale River basin in Germany. Results demonstrate that new implemented water quality parameters like chlorophyll a concentrations or oxygen amount in the reach can be reproduced quite well, although the model results, compared with results achieved without taking into account algal and transformation processes in the river, show obvious improvement only for some of the examined nutrients. Finally, some climate and water management scenarios expected to impact in-stream processes in the Saale basin were run. Their results illustrate the relative importance of physical boundary conditions on the amount and concentration of the phytoplankton, which leads to the conclusion that measures to improve water quality should not only take nutrient inputs into account but also climate influences and river morphology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, J. G., & Fohrer, N. (2005). SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrological Processes, 19, 563–572.
Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., Srinivasan, R., King, K. W., & Griggs, R. H. (1994). SWAT: Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Temple: USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
Behrendt, H., Kornmilch, M., Opitz, D., Schmoll, O., & Scholz, G. (2001). Flussgebietsdifferenzierte Nährstoffeinträge im Einzugsgebiet der Saale. In M. Rode, K. Henle, & A. Schellenberger (Eds.), Erhalt und Regenerierung der Flußlandschaft Saale (pp. 91–108). Halle: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.
BfG (Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde). (1996). Molekularbiologische Grundlagen und limnologische Bedeutung der Lichthemmung (Photoinhibition) der Photosynthese in Fließgewässern. BfG-Mitteilungen Nr. 13. Koblenz: BfG.
Brown, L. C., & Barnwell, T. O. (1987). The enhanced water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: documentation and user manual. Athens: USEPA. EPA/600/3-87/007.
Debele, R., Srinivasan, R., & Parlange, J.-Y. (2008). Coupling upland watershed and downstream waterbody hydrodynamic and water quality models (SWAT and CE-QUAL-W2) for better water resources management in complex river basins. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 13(1), 135–153.
EC (European Commission). (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy. (EU Water Framework Directive, WFD) (p. L 327). Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
Ennet, P., Pachel, K., Viies, V., Jürimägi, L., & Elken, R. (2008). Estimating water quality in river basins using linked models and databases. Estonian Journal of Ecology, 57(2), 83–99.
Everbecq, E., Gosselain, V., Viroux, L., & Descy, J.-P. (2001). POTAMON: a dynamic model for predicting phytoplankton composition and biomass in lowland rivers. Water Research, 35(4), 901–912.
FGG-Elbe (2004a). Bericht über die Umsetzung der Anhänge II, III und IV der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG im Koordinierungsraum Saale (B-Bericht). Vorlage zur Elbe-Ministerkonferenz am 9. Dezember 2004.
FGG-Elbe (2004b). Bericht über die Umsetzung der Anhänge II, III und IV der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG im Koordinierungsraum Saale (B-Bericht). Appendix 1: Tables 1a, 1b, and 2.
Garnier, J., Billen, G., & Coste, M. (1995). Seasonal succession of diatoms and Chlorophyceae in the drainage network of the seine river: observations and modeling. Limnology and Oceanography, 40(4), 750–765.
Gassmann, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4), 1211–1250.
Gerstengarbe, F.-W., & Werner, P. C. (2005). Simulationsergebnisse des regionalen Klimamodells STAR. In F. Wechsung, A. Becker, & P. Gräfe (Eds.), Auswirkungen des globalen Wandels auf Wasser, Umwelt und Gesellschaft im Elbegebiet (pp. 110–118). Berlin: Weißenseeverlag.
Gosselain, V., Descy, J.-P., Viroux, L., Joaquim-Justo, C., Hammer, A., Métens, A., et al. (1998). Grazing by large river zooplankton: a key to summer potamoplankton decline? The case of the Meuse and Moselle rivers in 1994 and 1995. Hydrobiologia, 369(370), 199–216.
Hattermann, F. F., Krysanova, V., Habeck, A., & Bronstert, A. (2006). Integrating wetlands and riparian zones in river basin modelling. Ecological Modelling, 199(4), 379–392.
Hesse, C., Krysanova, V., Päzolt, J., & Hattermann, F. F. (2008). Eco-hydrological modelling in a highly regulated lowland catchment to find measures for improving water quality. Ecological Modelling, 218, 135–148.
Hesser, F. B., Franko, U., & Rode, M. (2010). Spatially distributed lateral nitrate transport at the catchment scale. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 193–203.
Holst, H., Zimmermann-Timm, H., & Kausch, H. (2002). Longitudinal and transverse distribution of plankton rotifers in the potamal of the River Elbe (Germany) during late summer. International Review of Hydrobiology, 87(2–3), 267–280.
Horn, A. L., Rueda, F. J., Hörmann, G., & Fohrer, N. (2004). Implementing river water quality modelling issues in mesoscale watershed models for water policy demands—an overview on current concepts, deficits, and future tasks. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 725–737.
Jacob, D., & Bülow, K. (2005). Regionale Klimasimulationen zur Untersuchung der Niederschlagsverhältnisse in heutigen und zukünftigen Klimaten. In F. Wechsung, A. Becker, & P. Gräfe (Eds.), Auswirkungen des globalen Wandels auf Wasser, Umwelt und Gesellschaft im Elbegebiet (pp. 89–95). Berlin: Weißenseeverlag.
Ji, Z.-G. (2008). Hydrodynamics and water quality: modeling rivers, lakes and estuaries. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.
Krysanova, V., Meiner, A., Roosaare, J., & Vasilyev, A. (1989). Simulation modelling of the coastal waters pollution from agricultural watersheds. Ecological Modelling, 49, 7–29.
Krysanova, V., Wechsung, F., Arnold, J., Srinivasan, R., & Williams, J. (2000). SWIM (Soil and Water Integrated Model): user manual. Potsdam: PIK. Report No. 69.
Legates, D. R., & McCabe, G. J. (1999). Evaluation the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research, 35(1), 233–241.
Lindenschmidt, K.-E. (2005). River water quality modelling for river basin and water resources management with a focus on the Saale River, Germany. Habilitation thesis, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus.
LUFA (Landwirtschaftliche Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalt des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt) (1999). Grundlagen der Düngebedarfsermittlung für eine gute fachliche Praxis beim Düngen. Available from: http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/index.php?id=38309.
McElroy, A. D., Chiu, S. Y., Nebgen, J. W., Aleti, A., & Bennett, F. W. (1976). Loading Functions for assessment of water pollution from nonpoint sources. EPA 600/2-76-151. Springfield: National Technical Information Service.
Migliaccio, K. W., Chaubey, I., & Haggard, B. E. (2007). Evaluation of landscape and instream modeling to predict watershed nutrient yields. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 987–999.
Mischke, U., Behrendt, H., Köhler, J., & Opitz, D. (2005). Überarbeiteter Endbericht zum LAWA-Vorhaben: Entwicklung eines Bewertungsverfahrens für Fließgewässer mittels Phytoplankton zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Berlin: Leibniz-Institut für Gewässerökologie und Binnenfischerei (IGB).
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I: a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), 282–290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., & King, K. W. (2002). Soil and Water Assessment Tool theoretical documentation: version 2000. Report TR-191. Temple: TWRI.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., & King, K. W. (2002). Soil and Water Assessment Tool user’s manual: version 2000. Report TR-192. Temple: TWRI.
Nixdorf, B., Mischke, U., & Behrendt, H. (2002). Phytoplankton/Potamoplankton—wie geeignet ist dieser Merkmalskomplex für die ökologische Bewertung von Flüssen? In R. Deneke & B. Nixdorf (Eds.), Implementierung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in Deutschland: Ausgewählte Bewertungsmethoden und Defizite. BTUC-AR 5/2002 (pp. 39–52). Cottbus: Eigenverlag der BTU Cottbus.
Parajuli, P. B., Nelson, N. O., Frees, L. D., & Mankin, K. R. (2009). Comparison of AnnAGNPS and SWAT model simulation results in USDA-CEAP agricultural watersheds in south-central Kansas. Hydrological Processes, 23, 748–763.
Refsgaard, J. C., Thorsen, M., Jensen, J. B., Kleeschulte, S., & Hansen, S. (1999). Large scale modelling of groundwater contamination from nitrate leaching. Journal of Hydrology, 221(3–4), 117–140.
Reimann, G., & Seiert, J. (2001). Das Einzugsgebiet der Saale vor dem Hintergrund der geplanten Wasserrahmenrichtlinie der EU. In M. Rode, K. Henle, & A. Schellenberger (Eds.), Erhalt und Regenerierung der Flußlandschaft Saale (pp. 11–20). Halle: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.
Reimer, E., Soboudi, S., Mikusky, E., & Langer, I. (2005). Klimaprognose der Temperatur, der potenziellen Verdunstung und des Niederschlages mit NEURO-FUZZY-Modellen. In F. Wechsung, A. Becker, & P. Gräfe (Eds.), Auswirkungen des globalen Wandels auf Wasser, Umwelt und Gesellschaft im Elbegebiet (pp. 96–109). Berlin: Weißenseeverlag.
Rode, M., Thiel, E., Franko, U., Wenk, G., & Hesser, F. (2009). Impact of selected agricultural management options on the reduction of nitrogen loads in three representative meso scale catchments in Central Germany. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 3459–3472.
Scharfe, M., Callies, U., Blöcker, G., Petersen, W., & Schroeder, F. (2009). A simple Lagrangian model to simulate temporal variability of algae in the Elbe River. Ecological Modelling, 220, 2173–2186.
Scheffer, F., & Schachtschabel, P. (2002). Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer.
Schröder, A., & Matthies, M. (2002). Ammonium in Fließgewässern des Saale-Einzugsgebietes: Vergleich von Messwerten und Modellrechnungen in GREAT-ER. UWSF–Z Umweltchem Ökotox, 14(1), 37–44.
Schwoerbel, J. (1999). Einführung in die Limnologie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., & Demissie, M. (2004). Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT. Illinois State Water Survey contract report 2004-8. Available from: http://www.isws.illinois.edu/pubdoc/CR/ISWSCR2004-08.pdf.
Stefan, H. G., & Preud’homme, R. G. (1993). Stream temperature estimation from air temperature. Water Resources Bulletin, 29(1), 27–45.
Theile, K. (2001). Gewässergüte der Saale–Vergangenheits- und Zukunftsaspekte. In M. Rode, K. Henle, & A. Schellenberger (Eds.), Erhalt und Regenerierung der Flußlandschaft Saale (pp. 117–129). Halle: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.
Thorsen, M., Feyen, J., & Styczen, M. (1996). Agrochemical modelling. In M. B. Abbott & J. C. Refsgaard (Eds.), Distributed hydrological modelling (pp. 121–141). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
TLL (Thüringer Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft) (2007). Düngung in Thüringen 2007 nach “Guter fachlicher Praxis”. Schriftenreihe Landwirtschaft und Landschaftspflege in Thüringen, Heft 7/2007, available from: http://www.tll.de/ainfo/pdf/dung0108.pdf.
TMLNU (Thüringer Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Naturschutz und Umwelt) (2009). Gemeinsam KLIMAbewusst handeln: Thüringer Klima- und Anpassungsprogramm. Available from: http://www.thueringen.de/de/publikationen/pic/pubdownload1016.pdf.
van Griensven, A. (2002). Developments towards integrated water quality modelling for river basins. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Brussel.
van Griensven, A., & Bauwens, W. (2005). Application and evaluation of ESWAT on the Dender basin and the Wister lake basin. Hydrological Processes, 19(3), 827–838.
Viroux, L. (1997). Zooplankton development in two large lowland rivers, the Moselle (France) and the Meuse (Belgium), in 1993. Journal of Plankton Research, 19(11), 1743–1762.
Voß, A. (2007). Untersuchung und Modellierung der Stickstoff- und Phosphorumsatz- und Transportprozesse in mesoskaligen Einzugsgebieten des Tieflandes am Beispiel von Nuthe, Hammerfließ und Stepenitz. Ph.D. thesis, Potsdam University, Potsdam.
Wagenschein, D., & Rode, M. (2008). Modelling the impact of river morphology on nitrogen retention—a case study of the Weisse Elster River (Germany). Ecological Modelling, 211, 224–232.
Wechsung, F., Becker, A., & Gräfe, P. (Eds.). (2005). Auswirkungen des globalen Wandels auf Wasser, Umwelt und Gesellschaft im Elbegebiet: Konzepte für die nachhaltige Entwicklung einer Flusslandschaft. Band 6. Berlin: Weißenseeverlag.
Werner, A. (1997). Landwirtschaftlich genutzte Böden als Quellen und Senken bei geochemischen Prozessen. In J. Matschullat, H. J. Tobschall, & H.-J. Voigt (Eds.), Geochemie und Umwelt: Relevante Prozesse in Atmo-, Pedo- und Hydrosphäre. Berlin: Springer.
Werner, W., & Wodsack, H. P. (1994). Stickstoff- und Phosphoreintrag in die Fließgewässer Deutschlands unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Eintragsgeschehens im Lockersteinbereich der ehemaligen DDR. Agrarspectrum 22. Frankfurt: DLG.
Williams, J. R., & Hann, R. W. (1978). Optimal operation of large agricultural watersheds with water quality constraints. Technical report no. 96, Texas Water Resources Institute.
Ziemann, H. (2001). Auswirkungen der Abwasserlastsenkung durch den Neubau der Kläranlage Arnstadt auf die Gewässergüte der Gera (Thüringen). KA-Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser, Abfall, 48(4), 520–526.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hesse, C., Krysanova, V. & Voß, A. Implementing In-Stream Nutrient Processes in Large-Scale Landscape Modeling for the Impact Assessment on Water Quality. Environ Model Assess 17, 589–611 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-012-9320-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-012-9320-8