Skip to main content
Log in

Information and Closure

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peter Baumann and Nicholas Shackel defend me against a serious criticism by Christoph Jäger. They argue that my account of information is consistent with my denial of closure for knowledge. Information isn’t closed under known entailment either. I think that, technically speaking, they are right. But the way they are right doesn’t help me much in my effort to answer the skeptic. I describe a way in which information, like knowledge, fails to be closed in a way that makes an information-based account of knowledge an effective tool in answering the skeptic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred Dretske.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dretske, F. Information and Closure. Erkenntnis 64, 409–413 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-5815-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-5815-x

Keywords

Navigation