Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variability in flooding tolerance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was an exploratory in nature conducted using a large number of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes of diverse growth habit and adaptive characters. Soil flooding induced changes in eleven morpho-physiological characters of one-week old seedlings of 530 mungbean genotypes was compared in the study. The first and second principal components (PC) of principal component analysis (PCA) results accounted for 58 and 14%, respectively of the total variations of mungbean genotypes. The variation for first PC was composed mainly of relative dry weight (DW) of shoot and leaf as well as total DW. The second PC distinguished the genotypes that produced larger root system. There were seven clusters distinguished in the cluster analysis. The genotypes in cluster 4 and 6 performed better in respect of relative total DW and relative root DW, respectively and hence having flooding tolerance. The genotypes in clusters 7 and 1 performed very poorly and those of under clusters 3, 2 and 5 were moderate to poor. D2 analysis indicated that the clusters differed significantly from each other. Discriminant function analysis (DFA) reaffirmed that more than 90% of the genotypes were correctly assigned to clusters. Both PCA and DFA confirmed that the relative total DW followed by shoot and leaf DW as well as leaf area were the major discriminatory variables and the root : shoot ratio and root DW were the secondary important variables to distinguish genotypes into groups. In this study, multivariate analyses were used in identifying the mungbean genotypes of desirable traits for flooding tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asian Vegetable Research Development Centre (AVRDC) (1979) Progress report for 1978. Shanhua, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) (1999) Statistical year book of Bangladesh. BBS, Statistical Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford KJ, Hsiao TC (1982) Stomatal behavior and water relations of waterlogged tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants. Plant Physiol 70:1508–1513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chotechuen S, Carangal VR (1994) The use of covariance technique in screening mungbean accessions for waterlogging resistance. Thai Agril Res J 12:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew MC, Jackson MB, Gifford S (1979) Ethylene-promoted adventitious rooting and development of cortical air spaces (aerenchyma) in roots may be adaptive response to flooding in Zia mays L. Planta 147:83–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1992) Multivariate data analysis. Macmillan Pub. Co., New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid A, Agata WA, Moniruzzaman FM, Miah AA, (1991) Physiological aspects of yield improvement in mungbean. In: Kumar J (ed) Advances in pulses research in Bangladesh: Proceedings of the Second National Workshop on Pulses, Joydebpur, Bangladesh, 1989

  • Hamid A, Agata W, Kawamitsu Y (1990) Characteristics of photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of mungbean. Photosynthetica 24:96–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, NeSmith DS, Bridges DC, Johnson JW (1995) Responses of squash to salinity, waterlogging, and subsequent drainage. II. Root and shoot growth. J Plant Nutr 18:141–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MB, Kowalewska AKB (1983) Positive and negative messages from roots induce foliar desiccation and stomatal closure in flooded pea plants. J Exp Bot 34:493–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo CG, Chen BW (1980) Physiological responses of tomato cultivars to flooding. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 105:751–755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laosuwan P, Mekanawakul M, Thongsomsri A (1994) The effects of waterlogging on growth development and yield of mungbeans. Suranaree J Sci Tech 1:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YB, Yang XY, Liu FL, Lin YB, Yang XY, Liu FL (1994) Study on evaluation of waterlogging tolerance in 50 wheat varieties. Acta Agriculture Shanghai 10:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah AA, Moniruzzaman AFM, Rahman MM (1991) Problems and prospects of pulses production. In: Kumar J (ed) Advances in pulses research in Bangladesh: proceedings of the second national workshop on pulses, Joydebpur, Bangladesh, 1989

  • Morton JF, Smith RE, Poehlman JM (1982) The mungbean. Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, Department of Agronomy and Soils, University of Puerto Rico, special publication

  • Musgrave ME, Ding N (1998) Evaluating wheat cultivars for waterlogging tolerance. Crop Sci 38:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabben RHM, Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ (1999) Resistance to complete submergence on Rumex species with different life histories: the influence of plant size and light. New Phytol 144:313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachie KO, Roberts LM (1974) Grain legumes of the lowland tropics. Adv Agronomy 26:1–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas W, Barriga P, Figueroa H (2000) Multivariate analysis of the genetic diversity of Bolivian quinua germplasm. Plant Gen Resources Newlt 122:16–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosario DDA, Faustino FC (1985) Screening for drought resistance in mungbean. In: Proceedings of the workshop on varietal improvement for ricebased farming systems, Phjitsanulok, Thailand, 11–15 March 1985

  • Rosario DDA, Fajardo FF (1989) Waterlogging resistance in upland crops. Paper presented at the international workshop on varietal improvement of chickpea, pigeonpea and other upland crops in rice-based and other cropping systems, Kathmandhu, Nepal, 19–22 March 1989

  • Sandhu TS, Singh K, Singh B (1988) Mungbean germplasm resources evaluation and utilization. In: Mungbean: proceedings of the second international symposium, Bangkok, Thailand, 16–20 November 1987

  • Singh R, Ghildyal BP (1980) Soil submergence effects on nutrient uptake, growth, and yield of five corn cultivars. Agron J 72:737–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Gutierrez JA, Molina A, Urrea C, Gepts P (1991) Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean: marker-based analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Sci 31:23–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsou SCS, Shanmugasundaram S (1998) AVRDC’s global vegetable network strategies. In: World conference on horticultural research, Rome, Italy, 17–20 June 1998

  • Wenkert W, Fausey NR, Watters HD (1981) Flooding response to Zea mays L. Plant Soil 62:351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Rafiqul Islam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Islam, M.R., Hamid, A., Khaliq, Q.A. et al. Genetic variability in flooding tolerance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes. Euphytica 156, 247–255 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9372-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9372-z

Keywords

Navigation