nach oben

Journal of Financial Services Research

Erschienen in:

01.04.2014

Bank Consolidation and Soft Information Acquisition in Small Business Lending

verfasst von: Yoshiaki Ogura, Hirofumi Uchida

Erschienen in: Journal of Financial Services Research | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We empirically examine the impact of bank consolidation on bank acquisition of soft information about borrowers. Using a dataset of small business financing, we find that mergers of small banks have a negative impact on soft information acquisition, whereas mergers of large banks have no impact. We also find some evidence that an increase in organizational complexity upon a merger, rather than a post-merger cost-cut, is likely to cause a negative and significant impact on soft information acquisition by small banks. These findings are consistent with the organizational theory that predicts a comparative advantage of simple and flat organizations in acquiring and processing soft information.

Vorheriger Artikel The Non-monotonic Effect of Board Independence on Credit Ratings

Nächster Artikel On the County-Level Credit Outcome Beta

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Berger, Demsetz, and Strahan (1999), Amel, Barnes, Panetta, and Salleo (2004), and DeYoung, Evanoff, and Molyneux (2009) provide a literature review.

Uchida, Udell, and Yamori (2012) also investigate the determinants of soft information production by banks. However, their focus is on the role of loan officers in producing soft information, and they do not take into account the effect of bank consolidation.

See, for example, Berger and Udell (2002).

Boot and Thakor (2000) also show (in their Theorem 3) that banks are more likely to provide relationship lending for a larger portion of borrowers as the number of rivals increases, given the level of upfront investment in relationship lending. This is because relationship lending can shield their existing customers from poachers. We do not, however, focus on this effect in the present paper, since our dataset does not enable us to capture the number of borrowers with whom the banks try to maintain strong relationships. Rather, our focus is on how much soft information a bank maintains regarding each existing borrower.

Uchida et al. (2008b, 2012) use the same survey to investigate the use of lending technologies and the role of loan officers.

The Kansai area is the second-largest metropolitan area in Japan and the business center of Western Japan. This area consists of six prefectures. Among them, the target firms were chosen from Osaka, Hyogo, and Kyoto Prefectures, including those located in three major cities, Osaka, Kobe, and Kyoto, in their respective prefectures. Osaka is the third-largest city in Japan.

We eliminated these newest firms from our sample since it is likely that the amount of soft information accumulated by main banks about them may not be sufficiently large to have been affected by bank consolidation.

The scoring coefficients of variables Q1–Q6 with respect to this first principal component are all positive (respectively, 0.434, 0.419, 0.433, 0.363, 0.413, and 0.383).

We also conducted our analysis by using alternative measures: a simple average of the six indices, and the first principal component of the responses to Q1, Q2, and Q6, which are more closely related to firm-specific information. The results of the univariate and the multivariate analyses with these variables do not qualitatively differ from the results presented in the next two sections. These results are available from the authors upon request.

Member firms of Shinkin banks have 300 or fewer employees or capital of 900 million yen or less.

Note that long-term credit banks have not existed in Japan since 2006.

The average total assets of each institution type in our dataset as of March 2005 are 48,059 billion JPY for major banks (city, long-term credit, and trust banks), 2,716 billion JPY for regional banks, and 918 billion JPY for Shinkin banks.

We also conducted the analysis by changing the starting point of the window period from April 2000 to April 2003, but the result did not differ qualitatively. The result is available from the authors upon request.

Some banks experienced multiple mergers during the window period: 2 city, 1 trust, and 1 Shinkin banks.

See Table 4 for more detailed definitions of these variables and their descriptive statistics.

Some empirical evidence in support of this anecdotal evidence is reported in Uchida, Udell, and Watanabe. (2008).

Another noteworthy result is that the non-performing loan ratio of a main bank has a negative and significant coefficient in all the specifications. This result suggests the possibility that the accumulation of non-performing loans prevents banks from actively producing soft information about borrowers, although a more careful examination of the causality between bad loans and soft information acquisition is needed.

If we change the definition of the BHC dummy to include banks that have undergone a merger as well as the establishment of a bank holding company, the effect of a merger becomes less significant.

We are very grateful for the referee’s insightful suggestion on this point.

To be more precise, for each variable X (= asset size, loan size, number of bankers, or number of branches), we calculate the following measure:

$$ {{{\left( {X\,of\,the\,post-merger\,bank\,at\,the\,end\,of\,years} \right)}} \left/ {{\left( {weighted\,average\,of\,X\,of\,pre-merger\,banks\,at\,the\,end\,of\,year\,s-1} \right)}} \right.}-1, $$

where s is the year in which the merger took place.

We calculate the following measure.

$$ \frac{1}{5}\sum\limits_{t=2001}^{2005 } {\left[ {{{{\left( {X\,at\,the\,end\,of\,year\,t} \right)}} \left/ {{\left( {X\,at\,the\,end\,of\,year\,t-1} \right)}} \right.}-1} \right].} $$

That is, the cost-cut measure of variable X (=the number of branches, the number of bankers, overhead and personnel expenses, or ordinary expenses) is:

$$ {{{\left( {X\,of\,the\,post-merger\,bank\,at\,the\,end\,of\,year\,s+2} \right)}} \left/ {{\left( {X\,summed\,over\,all\,the\,pre-merger\,banks\,at\,the\,end\,of\,year\,s-1} \right)}} \right.}-1. $$

To be precise, the measure is defined as follows:

$ 3\cdot \frac{1}{5}\sum\limits_{t=2001}^{2005 } {\left[ {\left\{ {{{{\left( {X\,at\,the\,end\,of\,year\,t} \right)}} \left/ {{\left( {X\,at\,the\,end\,of\,year\,t-1} \right)}} \right.}-1} \right\}} \right]} . $

Akhigbe A, Madura J, Whyte AM (2004) Partial anticipation and the gains to bank merger targets. J Finan Serv Res 26:55–71CrossRef

Amel D, Barnes C, Panetta F, Salleo C (2004) Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: a review of the international evidence. J Bank Financ 28:2493–2519CrossRef

Avery RB, Samolyk KA (2004) Bank consolidation and small business lending: the role of community banks. J Finan Serv Res 25:291–325CrossRef

Beccalli E, Frantz P (2009) M&A operations and performance in banking. J Finan Serv Res 36:203–226CrossRef

Berger AN, Black LK (2011) Bank size, lending technologies, and small business finance. J Bank Financ 35:724–735CrossRef

Berger A, Udell G (2002) Small business credit availability and relationship lending: the importance of bank organizational structure. Econ J 112:32–53CrossRef

Berger A, Saunders A, Scalise J, Udell G (1998) The effects of bank mergers and acquisitions on small business lending. J Financ Econ 50:187–229CrossRef

Berger A, Demsetz R, Strahan P (1999) The consolidation of the financial services industry: causes, consequences, and implications for the future. J Bank Financ 23:135–194CrossRef

Berger A, Miller N, Petersen M, Rajan R, Stein J (2005) Does function follow organizational form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks. J Financ Econ 76:237–269CrossRef

Bonaccorsi di Patti E, Gobbi G (2007) “Winner or Losers? The effects of banking consolidation on corporate borrowers. J Finance 62:669–696CrossRef

Boot A (2000) Relationship banking: what do we know? J Financ Intermed 9:7–25CrossRef

Boot A, Thakor A (2000) Can relationship banking survive competition? J Finance 55:679–713CrossRef

Calomiris C, Pornrojnangkool T (2005) Monopoly-Creating Bank Consolidation? The Merger of Fleet and BankBoston. NBER Work Pap Ser 11351

Carow K, Kane E, Narayanan R (2006) How have borrowers fared in banking megamergers? J Money Credit Bank 38:821–836CrossRef

Cole R, Goldberg L, White L (2004) Cookie cutter vs. character: the micro structure of small business lending by large and small banks. J Financ Quant Anal 39:227–251CrossRef

Cornett M, McNutt J, Tehranian H (2006) Performance changes around bank mergers: revenue enhancements versus cost reductions. J Money Credit Bank 38:1013–1050CrossRef

Craig BR, Dinger V (2009) Bank mergers and the dynamics of deposit interest rates. J Finan Serv Res 36:111–133CrossRef

Degryse H, Ongena S (2007) The impact of competition on bank orientation. J Financ Intermed 16:399–424CrossRef

Degryse H, Masschelein N, Mitchell J (2011) Staying, dropping, or switching: the impacts of bank mergers on small firms. Rev Financ Stud 24:1102–1140CrossRef

DeYoung R, Evanoff DD, Molyneux P (2009) Mergers and acquisitions of financial institutions: a review of the post-2000 literature. J Finan Serv Res 36:87–110CrossRef

Elsas R (2005) Empirical determinants of relationship banking. J Financ Intermed 14:32–57CrossRef

Focarelli D, Panetta F (2003) Are mergers beneficial to consumers? Evidence from the market for bank deposits. Am Econ Rev 93:1152–1172CrossRef

Focarelli D, Panetta F, Salleo C (2002) Why do banks merge? J Money Credit Bank 34:1047–1065CrossRef

García-Appendini E (2007) Soft information in small business lending. EFA 2007 Ljubljana Meeting Paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=9681782007

Goddard J, McKillop D, Wilson JOS (2009) Which credit unions are acquired? J Finan Serv Res 36:231–252CrossRef

Hauswald R, Marquez R (2006) Competition and strategic information acquisition in credit markets. Rev Financ Stud 19:967–1000CrossRef

Hosono K, Sakai K, Tsuru K (2009) Consolidation of banks in Japan: Causes and consequences. Ch. 8. In: Ito T, Rose AK (eds) Financial sector development in the Pacific Rim, East Asia seminar on economics, Vol. 18, University of Chicago Press, 265–309

Houston J, James C, Ryngaert M (2001) Where do merger gains come from? Bank mergers from the perspective of insiders and outsiders. J Financ Econ 60:285–331CrossRef

Humphrey D, Vale B (2004) Scale economies, bank mergers, and electronic payments: a spline function approach. J Bank Financ 28:1671–1696CrossRef

Kane E (2000) Incentives for banking megamergers: what motives might regulators infer from event-study evidence? J Money Credit Bank 32:671–701CrossRef

Karceski J, Ongena S, Smith D (2005) The impact of bank consolidation on commercial borrower welfare. J Finance 50:2043–2082CrossRef

McNulty J (2008) Bank mergers and small firm finance: evidence from lender liability. Financ Markets Inst Inst 17(2):137–195CrossRef

Ministry of Finance (June 13, 1997) Waga Kuni Kin’yu Shisutemu No Kaikaku Ni Tsuite (On the reform of the Japanese Financial System), Financial System Research Council Report, (in Japanese)

Nigro PJ, Jacques KT (2000) Financial turmoil, failed bank acquisitions, and bank business lending behavior. J Finan Serv Res 17:149–164CrossRef

Panetta F, Schivardi F, Shum M (2009) Do mergers improve information? Evidence from the loan market. J Money Credit Bank 41:673–709CrossRef

Peek J, Rosengren E (1998) Bank consolidation and small business lending: it’s not just bank size that matters. J Bank Financ 22:799–819CrossRef

Penas M, Unal H (2004) Gains in bank mergers: evidence from the bond markets. J Financ Econ 74:149–179CrossRef

Prager R, Hannan T (1998) Do substantial horizontal mergers generate significant price effects? Evidence from the banking industry. J Ind Econ 46:433–452CrossRef

Rhoades S (1998) The efficiency effects of bank mergers: an overview of case studies of nine mergers. J Bank Financ 22:273–291CrossRef

Rime B, Stiroh K (2003) The performance of universal banks: evidence from Switzerland. J Bank Financ 27:2121–2150CrossRef

Sapienza P (2002) The effects of banking mergers on loan contracts. J Finance 57:329–367CrossRef

Stein J (2002) Information production and capital allocation: decentralized versus hierarchical firms. J Finance 57:1891–1921CrossRef

Stiroh K (2000) How did bank holding companies prosper in the 1990s? J Bank Financ 24:1703–1745CrossRef

Stiroh K, Rumble A (2006) The dark side of diversification: the case of U.S. Financial Holding Companies. J Bank Financ 30:2131–2161CrossRef

Uchida H (2011) What do banks evaluate when they screen borrowers? Soft information, hard information and collateral. J Finan Serv Res 40:29–48CrossRef

Uchida H, Udell G, Watanabe W (2008a) Bank size and lending relationships. J Jpn Int Econ 22:242–267CrossRef

Uchida H, Udell G, Yamori N (2008b) How do Japanese banks discipline small and medium-sized borrowers? An investigation of the deployment of lending technologies. Int Finan Rev 9 (entitled Institutional Approach to Global Corporate Governance):57–80

Uchida H, Udell G, Yamori N (2012) Loan officers and relationship lending to SMEs. J Financ Intermed 21:97–122CrossRef

Yamori N, Harimaya K, Kondo K (2003) Are banks affiliated with bank holding companies more efficient than independent banks? The recent experience regarding Japanese regional BHCs. Asia Pac Financ Mark 10:359–376CrossRef

Titel: Bank Consolidation and Soft Information Acquisition in Small Business Lending
verfasst von: Yoshiaki Ogura
Hirofumi Uchida
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Financial Services Research / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0920-8550
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0735
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-013-0163-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Directors’ Ownership and Closed-End Fund Discounts

The Non-monotonic Effect of Board Independence on Credit Ratings

The Effect of Bank Ownership Concentration on Capital Adequacy, Liquidity, and Capital Stability

On the County-Level Credit Outcome Beta