Abstract
Fire risk analysis for cables in a vertical cable tray is important for fire protection design in nuclear power plants. One important characteristic of vertical cable tray fires is the upward spreading of the cable flame along the cable tray, which should be considered as a time-varying fire source. Experiments involving vertical cable tray fires with a spacing of 0 and 8 mm between cable lines were conducted in confined compartments with dimensions of 3 m × 3 m × 3 m (length × width × height). The cable in a 0.3 m wide × 2 m long vertical cable tray was ignited using a line-source gas burner of a 20-kW premixed flame system. The experiments indicate that a room with a vertical cable tray fire could be divided into three zones with respect to thermal characteristics. Notably, a middle zone having reduced temperature was observed, even though the intensity of burning did not decrease. By considering the effect of a time-varying fire source, an expression for predicting the ceiling jet temperature was proposed. For the prediction of the maximum ceiling jet temperature, the relative errors were less than 18.8%; for the entire cable fire process, the normalized Euclidean distances were less than 20.4%. The available literature data concerning a vertical cable tray fire in a confined room were used to validate this expression. It is further confirmed that the proposed expression predicts well the literature data for vertical cable tray fires in a confined space. This new expression can be used for estimating the hazards from a vertically spreading fire in a compartment in nuclear power plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McGrattan K, Barehan S, Stroup D et al. (2012) Cable heat release, ignition, and spread in tray installations during fire (CHRISTIFIRE), phase 1: horizontal tray. Report NUREG/CR-7010, Vol. 1, Nuclear Regulatory Research.
Talbert JH (2015) Remembering the Browns Ferry fire, 40 years on. Nucl Eng Int 60: 20–21.
Werner W, Angener A, Rowekamp M, Gauvain J (2009) The OECD fire database—conclusions from phase 2 and outlook. In: SMIRT 20, 11th international post-conference on fire safety in nuclear power plant and installations, 2009.
Audouin L, Rigollet L, Prétrel H, Le Saux W, Röwekamp M (2013) OECD PRISME project: fires in confined and ventilated nuclear-type multi-compartments—overview and main experimental results, Fire Saf J 62: 80–101.
McGrattan K, Barehan S, Stroup D et al. (2013) Cable heat release, ignition, and spread in tray installations during fire (CHRISTIFIRE), phase 2: vertical shafts and corridors. Report NUREG/CR-7010, Vol. 2, Nuclear Regulatory Research.
Huang X, Zhu H, Peng L et al. (2018) An improved model for estimating heat release rate in horizontal cable tray fires in open space. J Fire Sci 36: 275–290.
Li L, Huang X, Bi K, Liu X (2016) An enhanced fire hazard assessment model and validation experiments for vertical cable trays. Nucl Eng Des 301: 32–38.
Zavaleta P, Audouin L (2017) Cable tray fire tests in a confined and mechanically ventilated facility. Fire Mater 42: 28–43.
Zavaleta P, Charbaut S, Basso G, Audouin L (2013) Multiple horizontal cable tray fire in open atmosphere. In: Thirteenth international conference of the fire and materials, San Francisco, pp 57–68.
Zavaleta P, Bascou S, Suard S. (2017) Effects of cable tray configuration on fire spread. In: Fifteenth international conference of the fire and materials, San Francisco, pp 17–30.
Saito K, Quintiere JG, Williams FA (1985) Upward turbulent flame spread. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on fire safety science, pp 75–86.
Tsai KC (2011) Influence of sidewalls on width effects of upward flame spread. Fire Saf J 46(5): 294–304.
Gollner MJ, William FA, Rangwala AS (2011) Upward flame spread over corrugated cardboard. Combust Flame 158(7): 1404–1412.
Jiang L, He J, Sun J (2018) Sample width and thickness effects on upward flame spread over PMMA surface. J Hazard Mater 342: 114–120.
Stern-Gottfried J, Rein G (2012) Travelling fires for structural design—part II: design methodology. Fire Saf J 54: 96–112.
Johansson N (2018) A case study of far-field temperatures in progressing fires. J Phys Conf Ser 1107: 042018.
Dai X, Welch S, Usmani A (2017) A critical review of “travelling fire” scenarios for performance-based structural engineering. Fire Saf J 91: 568–578.
McGrattan K, Peacock R, Overholt K (2016) Validation of fire models applied to nuclear power plant safety. Fire Technol 52: 5–24.
Backovsky J, Foote KL, Alvares NJ (1989) Temperature profiles in forced-ventilation enclosure fires. Fire Saf Sci 2: 315–324.
Mounaud LG (2004) A parametric study of the effect of fire source elevation in a compartment. Master’s Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Zhang J, Lu S, Li Q, Yuen RKK, Chen B, Yuan M, Li C (2012) Smoke filling in closed compartments with elevated fire sources. Fire Saf J 54(6): 14–23.
Zhang J, Lu S, Li Q, Yuen R, Yuan M, Li C (2013) Impacts of elevation on pool fire behavior in a closed compartment: a study based upon a distinct stratification phenomenon. J Fire Sci 31(2): 178–193.
Quintiere JG (2006) Fundamentals of fire phenomena. Wiley, Hoboken, p 187. ISBN: 0-470-09113-4.
Hurley MJ (2016) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin, p 3436. ISBN 978-1-4939-2564-3.
Johansson N, Wahlqvist J, van Hees P (2015). Numerical experiments in fire science: a study of ceiling jets. Fire Mater 39: 533–544.
Chow WK (1995) Use of zone models on simulating compartmental fires with forced ventilation. Fire Mater 19: 101–108.
Heskestad G (2008) Fire plumes, flame height, and air entrainment. In: DiNenno PJ, Drysdale D, Beyler CL, et al (eds) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, Chapter 2–1, 4th edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy.
Audouin L, Chandra L, Consalvi J-L, Gay L, Gorza E, Hohm V, Hostikka S, Ito T, Klein-Hessling W, Lallemand C, Magnusson T, Noterman N, Park JS, Peco J, Rigollet L, Suard S, Van-Hees P (2011) Quantifying differences between computational results and measurements in the case of a large-scale well-confined fire scenario. Nucl Eng Des 241(1): 18-31.
R\( {\ddot{\text{o}}} \)wekamp M, Dreisbach J, Klein-He\( \upbeta \)ling W, McGrattan K, Miles S, Plys M, Riese O (2008) International collaborative fire modeling project (ICFMP), Summary of Benchmark Exercises No. 1 to 5. Gesellschaft f\( {\ddot{\text{u}}} \)r Anlagenund Reaktorsicherhelt (GRS), Report Number GRS-227, ISBN 978-3-939355-01-4.
Riese O, Hosser D, Roewekamp M (2006) Evaluation of fire models for nuclear power plant applications Benchmark Exercise No. 5: flame spread in cable tray fires, International panel report, Gesellschaft f\( {\ddot{\text{u}}} \)r Anlagenund Reaktorsicherhelt (GRS), Report Number GRS-214, ISBN 978-3-931995-81-2.
Tu KM, Quintiere JG (1991) Wall flame heights with external radiation. Fire Technol 27: 195–203.
Acknowledgements
The work presented in this paper is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Project No. 2016YFC0800100) and the Development of Special Funds for the Development of Guangdong Province, China (Project No. 2016A010104001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, X., Zhu, H., Peng, L. et al. Thermal Characteristics of Vertically Spreading Cable Fires in Confined Compartments. Fire Technol 55, 1849–1875 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00833-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00833-9