Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Fire Technology 6/2019

Open Access 01.04.2019

Experimental Study on the Smouldering Combustion of Mineral Wool Insulation in Chimney Penetrations

verfasst von: Perttu Leppänen, Mikko Malaska

Erschienen in: Fire Technology | Ausgabe 6/2019

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A large number of fires have been caused by metal chimney penetrations in recent years. One factor that has contributed to these occurrences is smouldering combustion within mineral wool, which is often used as insulation in metal chimneys and their penetrations. Based on reaction to fire performance mineral wool is typically classified as a non-combustible material and in European standards it belongs to category Euroclass A1. However, mineral wool insulation products contain organic material, which smoulders and generates heat at temperatures between 200°C and 500°C. Experimental research indicates that this additional heat may increase the temperature in the chimney penetration materials over 100°C for a limited period of time. The European fire classification of materials does not set requirements to control mineral wool smouldering and limit the subsequent heat release. This experimental study examined the smouldering of mineral wool insulation products specified for chimney penetrations and the heat release generated during the smouldering combustion. The aim of the study was to determine the actual level of temperature increase within the chimney penetration and to estimate the effects of the increase with regard to fire safety. The study also reviewed how the smouldering potential of an insulation material could be considered in the fire classification of products.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

Despite mandatory certification procedures, some European countries have reported a high number of fires due to the presence of chimneys. For example, in Finland 600–700 building fires caused by fireplaces and chimneys are reported each year [1]. Similar fire safety problems have also been reported in other European countries [2]. In the United States, the majority of residential fires involved solid-fuelled equipment and fires were caused by the ignition of structural frame components [3]. Figure 1 shows a picture from a roof space in which the heat of a metal chimney has led to the ignition of the surrounding roof insulation material and caused a fire. Several reasons for chimney-penetration-induced fires have been identified. These include, for example, the fact that the actual on-site flue gas temperatures are higher than assumed in chimney design [4, 5], faulty installations, use contrary to operating instructions [6] and the smouldering combustion of mineral wool insulation [68]. Previous research by Neri et al. [911] and Leppänen et al. [4, 5, 12] have also shown that the standard test set-up and conditions are often different from the actual site installations and may not always lead to a safe solution. All the above issues can increase the temperatures in the roof construction.
Critical details for ensuring fire safety involve the places where chimneys pass through floors, roofs and walls. Based on the product standards of chimneys, the normal flue gas temperatures in residential use vary; for example, for metal chimney products [13], the normal working temperature can be 600°C in the most severe temperature class. Chimney penetration insulation and specific chimney penetration components are used to isolate the hot flue gasses from the flammable insulation materials and structural elements. The purpose of this insulation layer around the chimney is to reduce the surface temperatures adjacent to the chimney down to the level where ignition of the materials does not occur. In chimney product and test standards, the fire safe temperature level at the safe distance is set so low that there is no ignition hazard, even if the material is exposed to this temperature over a protracted period of time. In regulations, a maximum temperature of about 100°C has been considered safe for wood under prolonged exposure [14]. The approval of fire safety for metal chimneys is based on a CE marking and a chimney meets the requirements set in EN 1856-1 [13] if the temperature measured at a safe distance from the outer surface of the chimney does not exceed 85°C, when tested in accordance with EN 1859 [15]. The safe distance to combustible material is specified by the manufacturer of the chimney product. Temperatures inside the area defined by the safe distance are higher and vary between the flue gas temperature and 85°C.
Mineral wool products are often used as the insulation in chimney penetrations. According to standard EN 13501-1 [16], these products are classified as non-combustible. Mineral wool always contains binder, which is organic. In addition, other organic materials may be used for, for example, dust binding. Earlier research [68] have indicated that smouldering combustion of this organic material can occur in the chimney insulation. Smouldering is a flameless combustion that spreads at very low velocity in porous medium and it is characterized by heat release. The initiation of smouldering process is dominated by the oxidation of the medium and can occur when enough energy is available [17]. In case of a chimney penetration insulation, hot flue gasses supply the energy. Stable process occurs if the porous material has sufficient thickness and serves as a heat insulator to prevent heat release from the reaction to the environment [1820]. In smouldering processes, temperatures ranging between 400°C and 750°C have been measured in the reaction area. Smouldering combustion generates additional heat in the penetration structure that, in turn, increases the temperature of both the penetration insulation and the surrounding floor and roof structures. The additional heat may have a significant effect on the temperature of chimney penetrations and create a potential fire hazard in the surrounding structures. The organic material starts to evaporate when its temperature reaches 200°C and, based on the research by Leppänen et al. [7], all organic material has burned off when the temperature exceeds 500°C. Similar fire performance and pyrolysis of binders have been reported for stone wool in [21].
The amount of additional heat generated by smouldering combustion depends on the amount of organic material and the maximum temperature of the insulation. Figure 2 displays temperatures measured by Inha et al. [6] at the penetration insulation during two successive chimney tests on the same test specimen. In the test specimen, the metal chimney was connected to a sauna stove and installed through a 200-mm thick mineral wool insulation layer. The temperatures in Fig. 2 are measured from a thermocouple that is located in the middle of the mineral wool insulation layer and 100 mm from the face of the chimney flue. The solid curve for Test 1 includes the additional heat release generated by the burning of the organic material. The chimney test was then repeated using the same structure, the result of which is the temperature development depicted by the dashed curve for Test 2. The organic material burned in Test 1, while the additional heat generation was no longer detected in the second test. The difference between the two curves can be interpreted as the additional heat generated by the burning of organic material. The maximum difference in temperature was measured at 140 min and it was 230°C. After reaching its maximum value, the temperature of Test 1 started to decrease, which means that the organic content had burnt off. Temperatures in both tests were then approaching similar temperature level. The estimated duration of the temperature peak in this test was approximately 150 min. Hereafter, the additional heat generated by the burning of organic material is the difference between the maximum values of Tests 1 and 2.
Figure 3 shows an idealised vertical section where a chimney penetrates roof construction. The maximum continuous working flue gas temperature, which in this example is assumed to be 600°C in real use conditions, corresponds to temperature class T600 of EN 1856-1 [13]. The standard test temperature specified for class T600 is 700°C. This is a very typical situation, for example, in Finland. In this idealized example, a 100-mm-thick penetration insulation is used around the chimney flue and the outer face of the penetration insulation defines the safe distance from the chimney flue. In actual chimney installations the insulation thickness and safety distance required are normally designed on a case-by-case bases and they depend on chimney and penetration construction as well as on properties of penetration insulation products. Roof construction, including thermal insulation and timber roof structures, are installed in contact with the penetration insulation. In the figure, the dashed blue curve represents an allowable temperature distribution where the temperatures do not exceed 85°C outside the safe distance of 100 mm. A solid red curve illustrates the situation where the additional heat generated by the burning of organic material has raised the temperatures. If the temperatures outside the safe distance, area highlighted with red hatch marks in Fig. 3, exceed the ignition temperature of the roof construction materials, the fire hazard is apparent. Smouldering combustion generates heat over a relatively long period of time, which makes the problem even more serious, as the material ignition temperatures decrease when the structures are exposed to high temperatures over a longer period of time.
The building materials used for roofs are usually wood-based, mineral wool insulation and plastic insulation materials. For wood, it is not possible to determine an unequivocal ignition temperature because it is dependent on exposure time. According to Babrauskas [22], wood ignites at around 250°C during short-term fire exposure. After a few hours of exposure, the ignition temperature can be much lower, below 200°C [14, 2224]. Wood fibre insulation begins to smoulder at temperatures between 225°C and 290°C [25, 26]. Conservative generic values of the critical ignition temperatures for rigid polyisocyanurate foam (PIR) and rigid phenolic foam (PF) are approximately 300°C and 425°C, respectively [21, 27]. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) melts prior to pyrolysis at around 240°C [21].
Mineral wool insulation products are often used as chimney penetration insulation due to their good fire performance. In the field of fire safety, the most essential characteristics and testing procedures for building products are defined by the harmonized Euroclass system. The system includes a classification system that is based on the reaction-to-fire performance and defines the test methods according to which products shall be categorised. Mineral wool may be included in the highest category Euroclass A1 (non-combustible). The classification and the reaction-to-fire properties are determined either by testing or by the CWFT (classification without further testing) regulation by the European Commission. The EN 13501-1 classification standard [16] sets threshold values for Euroclass A1 products. Non-combustibility is determined in accordance with EN ISO 1182 [28] and calorific value in accordance with EN ISO 1716 [29]. In addition, the method specified in EN 13823 [30] is also used. Commission Decision 96/603/EC [31] contains a list of products that may be included in Euroclass A1 without testing. Mineral wool is one of the materials. None of these materials are allowed to contain more than 1.0% by weight or volume (whichever is the lower amount) of homogeneously distributed organic material. For mineral wool, this is demonstrated by tests carried out in accordance with the method given in EN 13820 [32]. The percentage of organic material in the insulation is called an LOI (Loss On Ignition) value and it states the content of the mass of organic material in relation to the original mass of the sample.
A new testing method for analysing and assessing continuous glowing combustion testing was published in May 2016 and is introduced in EN 16733 [33]. The method, which was developed by the Institut für Brandtechnologie GmbH [34], is based on the method specified in EN 13823 [26]. In the research carried out by the Institut für Brandtechnologie GmbH, three different mineral wool products were tested. The mineral wool binder contents were measured at 3.2%, 4.6% and 3.7% by weight (LOI values). No continuous glowing combustion was detected in the product with the lowest LOI value. This was explained by the low binder content. With the two other mineral wools, glowing combustion was reported. The study report did not include more specific product information or material characteristics.
Previous research have demonstrated that the smouldering combustion of mineral wool insulation products can increase the temperatures of chimney penetration construction during heater operation [6, 7]. However, the research did not consider how sensitive the temperature rise is to the amount of organic content or how high the temperature can rise due to smouldering combustion. For analysing the effects of organic content on the fire safety of chimney penetration construction more information was required on how much the organic content can increase the temperatures and how long is the time the structures are exposed to this additional heat. The above standardized methods are predominantly testing the performance of a building product exposed to an open flame and, therefore, do not correspond to continuous heating conditions. Further research was, therefore, required to determine whether or not the additional heat generated by the burning of organic material should be taken into account when designing chimney penetrations and to develop a robust method for controlling the maximum temperatures in the chimney penetration structures.
In order to answer the above questions an experimental study [8] was carried out at Tampere University (formerly Tampere University of Technology). This paper introduces the test program and the main results of the study and, then analyses and discusses whether or not the additional heat generated by the burning of organic material should be taken into account when designing chimney penetrations, and whether the amount of organic material in penetration insulation should be limited in order to impact heat release and reduce fire hazards.

2 Research Method

The aim of the experimental research was to determine how much additional heat typical mineral wool insulation products used as chimney penetration insulation are generating when exposed to high temperatures. The research consisted of two steps. In the first step, the amount of organic material in each mineral wool test sample was determined by burning the samples in an electric furnace and by comparing the weighed masses of the samples prior and after the burning. In the second step, new samples from the same insulation products as used in step 1 were installed into a support structure placed on the furnace front opening. In these tests, the temperatures of the mineral wool samples were monitored from various points of the samples and over a longer period of time. Each sample was exposed to same temperature twice and the additional heat generated by the burning of organic material was then measured as the difference between the temperatures during the two heat exposure. By combining the results of the two steps, it was then possible to interpret the relationship between the organic content and the maximum temperature rise in a mineral wool sample and further in a product. The method is presented in Fig. 4.
The details of the test program, equipment and methodology are described in the following subsections.

2.1 Test Program

The amount of organic material in the mineral wools affects the heat generation and, therefore, several mineral wool products with different amounts of organic material were included in the experimental test program. Three different manufacturers were included in the study and seven different products were tested. All of the tested products except one were primarily intended to serve as chimney penetration insulation. The other product was intended for steelwork fire protection. According to the Declaration of Performances by the manufacturers, all of the tested products were classified as Euroclass A1 (non-combustible).
This report does not contain the actual product names, but the samples have been given letter-number combinations. The letters a, b and c refer to the three manufacturers. The subsequent numbers refer to a particular product from the manufacturer. The test included four products from manufacturer a. Product a2 was not meant for chimneys. Two products were from manufacturer b and one product was from manufacturer c. The products were acquired from various hardware stores in Finland.

2.2 Research Equipment

An electric Ceramotherm furnace was used for the study. Its inner dimensions are 550 mm × 700 mm × 800 mm, and the maximum temperature is 1340°C (Fig. 5). The furnace temperature was measured from the centre of the furnace using a type-K sheathed thermocouple. The furnace temperature was controlled with a computer program. Depending on the temperature measured, the computer turned the furnace resistors on and off. When determining the amount of organic material and heat release, 500°C was the highest temperature that was used.

2.3 Organic Content

The amount of dissipated organic material in a mineral wool test sample was determined by keeping the sample in a constant temperature furnace environment over 2 h and measuring the weight loss of the sample. The dissipation of organic material was measured at three different temperatures: 300°C, 400°C and 500°C. The organic material in the mineral wool was burned during the process, with the mass of organic material dissipated at different temperatures determined as the difference between the weighed masses.
The material samples used in the tests were of disc shape with a diameter of 90 mm and thickness of 50 mm. Three test samples were prepared from each insulation type. A hole saw was used to remove discs from mineral wool boards. The texture of insulation sample a3 was so soft that a hole saw could not be used. Instead, test samples of 100 mm × 100 mm × 50 mm were cut out of insulation material a3.
The test samples were weighed and then dried at a temperature of 105°C. The dried samples were then weighed and set in the electric furnace (Fig. 6). The furnace was first heated to 300°C and kept at this temperature for 2 h. Then the test samples were weighed. The heating was repeated, first to 400°C and then to 500°C, with the same test samples weighed after both rounds of heating. The test differed from the test specified in standard EN 13820 [32] in that the test samples were heated to three different temperatures, whereas the standard test only uses 500°C. In the standard test of [32], the test sample consists of at least eight smaller specimens from different parts of the insulation product. In this research, the number of specimen was limited to three and, therefore, larger specimens were used to cover local differences in the amount of organic material.

2.4 Additional Heat Generated by the Burning of Organic Material

The test arrangement and the preparation and instrumentation of the samples are based on an earlier study [7]. Three tests were carried out using the electric furnace, with each test consisting of four samples installed into support structure placed on the furnace front opening. During the first two tests, a furnace temperature of 500°C was maintained. During the third test, the temperature was 300°C in order to assess the amount of additional heat at a lower temperature. One test included two separate rounds of heating that were named the first and second heating. During the first heating, the organic material in the insulation burned and caused additional heat. During the second heating, the organic material had already burned and did not have an effect on the temperature variation in the insulation. Thus, the second heating is similar to a situation in which there is no organic material in the insulation. The additional heat generated by the burning of organic material was then determined as the difference between the temperatures measured during the first and second heating.
The test samples were 200 mm square and 100 mm thick. The earlier study [7] concluded that a 100 mm thick test sample represents the maximum heat release generated by the burning of organic material in the test arrangement used. The selected sample thickness of 100 mm is also close to the thickness of typical chimney penetration insulation. The test samples were made of two approximately 50-mm-thick mineral wool boards placed together back to back. One exception was test sample b2, which was made from ten 10-mm-thick mineral wool boards because that particular mineral wool product was only available with that thickness. The test samples were covered with aluminium foil, except for the side facing away from the furnace, to reduce the airflow inside of them. A foil-covered test sample is depicted in Fig. 7.
The temperature of the test samples was measured from the surface facing the furnace between the aluminium foil and the mineral wool, as well as from various points at 10 mm intervals through the cross-section all the way to the side facing away from the furnace. The structure of the test sample and the temperature measurement points are illustrated in Fig. 8. The surrounding room temperature, Tamb, was measured from a distance of two meters from the surface facing away from the furnace.
The test samples were installed into 100 mm thick support structure placed on the furnace front opening. The support structure was made of two 50-mm-thick mineral wool boards tied together using threaded rods and nuts, as shown in Fig. 9. Four square-shaped holes were cut into the boards into which the test samples were placed. The side dimensions of the holes and test samples were 200 mm.
Two tests were carried out at a furnace temperature of 500°C and one test at 300°C. One test included two separate rounds of heating. At the start of the first heating, the furnace temperature was raised from room temperature to a target temperature of 500°C. During the heating of the furnace, 50-mm-thick mineral wool slabs were used to cover the holes reserved for the test samples. After the furnace temperature had plateaued at 500°C, the hole covers were removed, one by one, and replaced with the test samples. The test was then continued at 500°C until the temperatures measured from the samples did not change anymore, after which point the furnace was turned off. During the second heating, the test samples from the first heating were tested again in a manner similar to the first heating. The third test including four samples was carried out in a similar fashion, but the furnace temperature was set to 300°C.
In this study, the additional heat generated by the burning of organic material was determined as the difference between the highest temperatures measured during the first and second heating. The highest temperatures were determined based on the measured temperature development at different points of the test sample cross-sections. The highest temperatures of the first heating (T1) were determined as the maximum value of the temperature peak whereas during the second heating, temperatures approached the maximum values (T2) at the end of the test. Temperature difference was then calculated as the difference between temperatures T1 and T2. The approach is demonstrated for test sample b1 in Fig. 12a.

2.5 Measurement Uncertainty

In the tests determining the content of organic material, the main source of uncertainty related to the measurement method is the accuracy of determining the dimensions of the test samples. The softest mineral wools are easily compressed, which made measurement more difficult. A hole saw was used to ensure maximum accuracy for the size of the test samples. For mineral wool a3, a hole saw could not be used, which increased the uncertainty regarding the measurements. Test samples for mineral wool a4 were cut from a cylinder-shaped pipe section, thus increasing the dispersion of the test sample thicknesses.
In the tests determining the heat generated by the burning of organic material, the temperature measured from a test sample is largely dependent on the distance of the measuring point to the heated surface. Even a small deviation in the measurement point location can have a significant impact on the temperature measured. With soft wool insulation in particular, it is difficult to determine the accuracy of the installation. This inaccuracy does not, however, affect the calculation of the temperature rise because the first and second heating are carried out with the same test samples and the measuring points remain the same. The deviations in measuring point locations do have an effect on the estimated shape of temperature distribution, but the effect of the deviations on the results (i.e., the allowed amount of organic material) of this study can be assumed to be small.
One important source of uncertainty in the method presented above is that the amount of organic material (Step 1) and the temperature rise (Step 2) were measured from different test samples taken from the same mineral wool product. As the binder density can vary in an insulation product, it is possible that the organic content used in the two tests was slightly different.

3 Test Results

In this section, the results of the experimental test program described in Sect. 2 are introduced. The organic content of different mineral wool samples and the measured temperature development in the samples are reported in sub-clauses 3.1 and 3.2, respectively. Based on the results, the relationship between the organic content and the corresponding temperature rise can be determined. The results also demonstrate the magnitude and duration of the temperature peak.

3.1 Organic Content

Table 1 shows the amounts of organic material in the test samples used in the furnace tests. The contents of organic material varied between 1.3% and 4.5% by weight, but these contents do not tell us anything about the crucial factor for heat release (i.e., the amount of organic material burned). A better indicator is the amount of organic material by volume. The lowest amount of organic material by volume was in insulation product a3, approximately 1.0 kg/m3. The largest amount of organic material by volume was measured in insulation b1, over 5.0 kg/m3. Overall, it can be stated that the denser mineral wools contained more organic material.
Table 1
Results for the amount of organic material in mineral wool. The maximum standard deviation calculated for the organic content of an insulation product was 0.17 kg/m3 (a4)
Test sample
Volume (m3)
Mass (g)
Dry mass (g)
Density (kg/m3)
Mass (g) (300°C)
Mass (g) (400°C)
Mass (g) (500°C)
LOI value (mass%)
Amount of organic content (kg/m3)
a1
 1
0.00031
42.81
42.71
140
42.37
41.75
41.68
2.41%
3.37
 2
0.00031
41.88
41.74
137
41.41
40.84
40.73
2.42%
3.31
 3
0.00030
43.64
43.54
146
43.16
42.57
42.47
2.46%
3.58
a2
 1
0.00031
55.69
55.56
182
55.06
54.17
54.08
2.66%
4.85
 2
0.00031
56.11
55.99
183
55.5
54.62
54.51
2.64%
4.85
 3
0.00030
55.03
54.92
184
54.42
53.58
53.47
2.64%
4.85
a3
 1
0.00057
39.11
39
68
38.69
38.43
38.43
1.46%
1.00
 2
0.00060
38.52
38.42
64
38.1
37.88
37.87
1.43%
0.92
 3
0.00062
41.5
41.43
67
41.13
40.92
40.88
1.33%
0.89
a4
 1
0.00026
22.26
22.22
85
22
21.69
21.63
2.66%
2.26
 2
0.00026
21.59
21.53
83
21.35
21.08
21.02
2.37%
1.96
 3
0.00033
25.86
25.78
78
25.55
25.18
25.12
2.56%
2.00
b1
 1
0.00031
50.97
50.82
163
50.29
49.35
49.18
3.23%
5.26
 2
0.00031
40.85
40.71
133
40.29
39.46
39.32
3.41%
4.55a
 3
0.00031
47.87
47.75
153
47.24
46.28
46.06
3.54%
5.42
b2
 1
0.00032
29.95
29.77
94
29.24
28.57
28.43
4.50%
4.21
 2
0.00032
32.69
32.52
102
32
31.29
31.12
4.31%
4.40
 3
0.00032
28.78
28.62
90
28.1
27.44
27.31
4.58%
4.12
c1
 1
0.00032
31.48
35.67
110
35.35
35.01
34.97
1.96%
2.16
 2
0.00032
33.5
33.4
105
33.11
32.77
32.73
2.01%
2.11
 3
0.00032
35.8
31.4
99
31.14
30.85
30.8
1.91%
1.89
aResult differs significantly from the other values and was thus excluded from the analysis
The dissipation of organic material was measured at three different temperatures: 300°C, 400°C and 500°C. A clear mass loss was observed at temperature of 300°C. The most significant portion of organic material had dissipated at 400°C, but a small amount of it was still burning at 500°C. Figure 10 depicts the amount of dissipated organic material by volume in different test samples and at different temperatures.
The results indicated some dispersion for the amount of organic material in mineral wool. Table 1 shows that the consistency and mass of test sample b1:2 differed significantly from the other two test samples from the same product. The deviation was considered so large that test sample b1:2 was excluded from the heat release study that was reported in Sect. 3.2.

3.2 Additional Heat Generated by the Burning of Organic Material

Temperature graphs for the first heating of test samples b1 and c1 are illustrated in Fig. 11. Sample b1 represents a product with high organic content (over 5 kg/m3) and c1 signifies a product with low organic content (approx. 2 kg/m3). The graphs represent temperatures on the test sample cross-sections at 10 mm intervals, during the first heating and with the furnace temperature at 500°C. Additional heat release that stabilizes over the course of 180 min was clearly noticeable. The temperature rise is clearly lower and the organic material burns to completion faster when the concentration is low.
With this test arrangement, the largest temperature rise generated by the burning of organic material was measured at approximately the centre of the test sample. When moving towards the surface facing away from the furnace, the additional heat was significantly reduced, as there was less burning of the organic material and less heat release due to a lower temperature. No burning of organic material occurred near the outer surface of the test sample, and the additional heat was able to be transferred from the centre to the surrounding area through the surface. Also convection affects the temperatures on the side facing away from the furnace. This outcome differs from a chimney penetration, as the penetration insulation faces the thermal insulation within the roof. This observation means the additional heat is not able to cool down in the same way as during the furnace test.
Figure 12 illustrates the temperature graphs for the first and second heating for the test samples b1 and c1 measured at a distance of 50 mm from the surface facing the furnace. The heat release generated by the burning of organic material was evident during the first heating, but the second heating of the same test samples did not create any heat release. When comparing the results from the first and second heating, the temperature rise generated by the burning of organic material is visible. For sample b1, the maximum difference in temperature was measured at 60 min and it was 300°C. The duration of this peak was approximately 150 min (2.5 h). For sample c1, the maximum temperature difference was 100°C at 45 min and the duration was 120 min.
Based on the measured temperature data, the organic material can be presumed to have been burned during the first heating. Tables 2 and 3 present the highest temperatures measured during the first (T1) and second (T2) heating, as well as the temperature increase (T2–T1) at various points within the mineral wool cross-sections. The definitions of the highest temperatures are given in sub-Sect. 2.4. Table 4 presents equivalent measurement results for the third test with the furnace temperature maintained at 300°C. The results demonstrate that none of the test samples exhibited significant heat release during this third test. For test sample b1, higher temperatures were measured during the second heating and it can be assumed that no burning of organic material occurred.
Table 2
Highest temperatures at different points of the test sample cross-sections during the first (T1) and second (T2) heating of test series 1 with the furnace temperature at 500°C. The distance is measured from the surface facing the furnace
Test 1
a1
a4
b2
c1
Dist.
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
0 mm
491
457
34
484
464
20
493
456
37
470
455
14
10 mm
482
392
90
0
0
0
529
413
116
419
385
35
20 mm
465
375
90
447
400
48
545
388
157
400
366
34
30 mm
460
352
108
437
379
58
552
350
203
359
321
38
40 mm
422
319
103
397
339
58
561
313
247
342
306
36
50 mm
404
301
102
388
330
57
566
282
284
317
281
37
60 mm
316
226
90
301
247
54
566
248
318
244
214
30
70 mm
265
194
71
234
195
39
518
207
311
180
159
21
80 mm
184
132
52
175
144
31
398
158
240
153
133
20
90 mm
88
74
14
101
84
18
281
102
179
98
89
9
100 mm
50
62
− 12
71
67
4
99
53
46
61
60
1
Table 3
Highest temperatures at different points of the test sample cross-sections during the first (T1) and second (T2) heating of test series 2 with the furnace temperature at 500°C. The distance is measured from the surface facing the furnace
Test 2
a2
a3
b1
c1_2
Dist.
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
0 mm
503
469
34
453
454
− 2
527
466
61
480
464
15
10 mm
524
418
106
387
376
11
553
412
141
445
405
39
20 mm
520
376
144
361
346
15
563
380
183
407
356
51
30 mm
527
353
174
350
335
14
573
354
219
 
335
 
40 mm
492
318
174
326
309
16
562
322
240
363
312
51
50 mm
475
302
173
312
295
17
552
303
248
344
294
50
60 mm
387
231
157
173
159
14
469
234
235
256
214
42
70 mm
299
174
125
169
149
20
395
172
223
193
158
35
80 mm
228
133
95
87
76
11
278
124
154
155
128
27
90 mm
125
78
47
84
72
11
228
101
127
90
71
19
100 mm
76
49
28
70
63
7
81
48
33
60
53
8
Table 4
Highest temperatures at different points of the test sample cross-sections during the first (T1) and second (T2) heating of test series 3 with the furnace temperature at 300°C. The distance is measured from the surface facing the furnace
Test 3
a1
a2
b1a
b2
Dist.
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
T1
T2
T1–T2
0 mm
261
263
− 2
288
284
3
244
246
− 2
278
274
3
10 mm
252
245
7
257
246
10
186
193
− 7
249
243
6
20 mm
223
217
6
234
224
10
164
170
− 6
229
225
4
30 mm
209
202
7
218
209
9
147
154
− 7
203
198
5
40 mm
191
185
6
197
190
8
130
137
− 7
178
174
4
50 mm
177
171
6
186
179
7
120
127
− 7
161
156
4
60 mm
125
119
6
150
145
5
88
94
− 6
137
137
1
70 mm
104
101
3
112
108
4
67
72
− 5
115
115
0
80 mm
72
70
2
87
84
3
53
56
− 3
87
88
− 1
90 mm
56
55
1
60
57
3
38
38
0
59
59
0
100 mm
43
42
1
40
39
0
32
31
1
36
36
0
aTemperatures for test sample b1 remained so low that no burning of organic material occurred. Higher temperatures were measured for the test sample during the second heating
Figures 13 and 14 illustrate the temperature rise measured from different points of the mineral wool cross-section at 500°C. The temperature rise refers to the difference between the highest temperatures measured during the first (T1) and second (T2) heating.

4 Discussion

The test results reported in Sect. 3 show that the temperature rise generated by the burning of organic material may increase the temperatures of penetration structures up to the ignition threshold of these materials. It is, therefore, important that the maximum possible temperatures and the risk of ignition in the chimney penetration area can be estimated. In this section, the fire-safe temperature levels are first discussed. The actual floor temperatures are then estimated according to the test results of Sect. 3. Finally, the EN standards specifying the fire resistance properties of penetration insulation materials are reviewed in the light of fire-safe amount of organic material they contain.
Based on the experimental results reported in Sect. 3, combustion burning can raise the temperature levels in a chimney penetration insulation up to 300°C, which means that it is possible that the ignition temperatures of the combustible roof construction materials at safe distance are exceeded. If 200–250°C is considered a critical temperature level for the combustible materials, then the additional heat generated by smouldering combustion should cause an increase in temperature lower than 115–165°C.
The mineral wool insulation products included in this research contained very different amounts of organic material that varied between 1.0 kg/m3 (sample a3) and 5.0 kg/m3 (sample b1). The heat release at different levels of organic content can be visualised with a graph in which the x-axis represents the amount of organic material (kg/m3) and the y-axis represents the temperature rise in test samples at 500°C furnace temperature. The temperature rise of all the eight test samples are shown as blue points in Fig. 15. The results represent the temperatures measured at 50 mm from the surface facing the test furnace. For the amount of organic material, the average value of the three test samples is used (refer to Table 1). The temperature rise is calculated as the difference between the highest temperatures from the first (T1) and second (T2) heating. Figure 15 shows that the temperature rise is almost directly proportional to the amount of organic material in the insulation (kg/m3). The dotted straight line in the figure is the best fit to the data points. The largest deviation between the linear best fit and the tested values was in sample b2, which consisted of ten 10-mm-thick mineral wool layers. It is assumed that the temperature rise was higher because this sample had better oxygen supply than the samples consisting of two 50-mm-thick layers. It can be seen from the figure that an organic content of approximately 3.0 kg/m3 would generate temperature rise critical for the fire safety of a chimney penetration. In this study, four out of seven products had organic content that exceeded 3.0 kg/m3.
When the lowest LOI value of the tests carried out by the Institut für Brandtechnologie GmbH [34] is compared to the LOI values of the products included in this study, it can be seen that only two of the products exceed this LOI value. It would appear, based on this comparison, that EN 16733 [33] does not provide a sufficient method to ensure a fire-safe level of organic material. However, further studies are required to verify this observation.
Based on the above analysis, it can be concluded that the current standards used for assessing and classifying insulation products do not sufficiently take into account the effects of the temperature rise generated by the burning of organic material in continuous heating conditions. Further research is required to achieve a robust method for controlling the maximum temperatures in the chimney penetration structures.
In the example used in this research it was assumed that the continuous working flue gas temperature is 600°C, which corresponds to temperature class T600 of EN 1856-1 and, which is a very typical situation in Finland. For lower temperature classes the temperatures within the penetration construction are lower leading also to lower temperature rise due to burning of organic material. This can be seen from the results of test series 3 with the furnace temperature at 300°C.

5 Conclusion

The paper presents experimental research on the smouldering of mineral wool insulation products specified for chimney penetrations and the heat release generated during the smouldering combustion. The following five conclusions can be drawn from the results of this study.
The smouldering combustion of the organic content in typical chimney penetration insulation products generates heat and can increase the temperature in chimney penetration materials by up to 250°C for a limited period of time.
Due to the additional heat release from smouldering, the ignition temperatures of combustible roof construction materials located adjacent to chimney penetration may be exceeded during normal fireplace operation. The experimental results show that the temperatures can be significantly higher than the fire-safe temperature levels given in product and test standards. Therefore, a potential fire hazard exists if the heat release is not limited to fire-safe levels.
The additional heat generated by the burning of organic material is proportional to the amount of organic material in mineral wool (kg/m3). A threshold value is required to limit the organic content in the penetration insulation materials to fire-safe level. Based on the results of this study, an organic content of approximately 3.0 kg/m3 would generate a heat release that can lead to the ignition of combustible roof materials.
The European fire classification of materials does not set any requirements for controlling mineral wool smouldering and limiting the subsequent heat release in continuous heating conditions. Based on the results of this study, testing in accordance with EN ISO 1182 [28], EN ISO 1716 [29], EN 13820 [32] and EN 16733 [33] does not ensure the fire safety of chimney penetration structures. Further research is required to define a fire-safe threshold value and develop a reliable assessment method for organic content. Based on the results of this study, it is also more relevant to determine the amount of organic material by volume (kg/m3) than by the percentage by weight.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of the Environment of Finland.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Buffo S, Dadone PN (2007) Studio statistico vigili del fuoco di Brescia sulle cause dell’incendito tetto (in Italian). Vigili del Fuco di Brescia, Brescia Buffo S, Dadone PN (2007) Studio statistico vigili del fuoco di Brescia sulle cause dell’incendito tetto (in Italian). Vigili del Fuco di Brescia, Brescia
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell R (2017) Home fires involving heating equipment. National Fire Protection Association NFPA, US. www.nfpa.org. Accessed 11 June 2018 Campbell R (2017) Home fires involving heating equipment. National Fire Protection Association NFPA, US. www.​nfpa.​org. Accessed 11 June 2018
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Inha T, Leppänen P, Peltomäki M et al. (2011) Fire safety of light-weight metal chimneys. Research report no. PALO 1950/2011. Department of Civil Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Finland. (In Finnish) 52 p. + 25 p. app Inha T, Leppänen P, Peltomäki M et al. (2011) Fire safety of light-weight metal chimneys. Research report no. PALO 1950/2011. Department of Civil Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Finland. (In Finnish) 52 p. + 25 p. app
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Leppänen P, Neri M, Mäkinen J (2015) Heat release caused by the smouldering combustion of the binder of rockwool. J Struct Mech 48(1): 68–82 Leppänen P, Neri M, Mäkinen J (2015) Heat release caused by the smouldering combustion of the binder of rockwool. J Struct Mech 48(1): 68–82
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Leppänen P, Malaska M (2016) The effects of smouldering combustion of mineral wool insulation with regard to fire safety of chimney penetrations. Research report no. PALO 2466/2016. Department of Civil Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Finland. (In Finnish). Leppänen P, Malaska M (2016) The effects of smouldering combustion of mineral wool insulation with regard to fire safety of chimney penetrations. Research report no. PALO 2466/2016. Department of Civil Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Finland. (In Finnish).
13.
Zurück zum Zitat EN 1856-1 (2009) Chimneys. Requirements for metal chimneys. Part 1: system chimney products. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels EN 1856-1 (2009) Chimneys. Requirements for metal chimneys. Part 1: system chimney products. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaffer EL (1980) Smoldering initiation in cellulosics under prolunged heating. Fire Technol 16(1): 22–28CrossRef Schaffer EL (1980) Smoldering initiation in cellulosics under prolunged heating. Fire Technol 16(1): 22–28CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat EN 1859 + A1 (2013) Chimneys. Metal chimneys. Test methods. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels EN 1859 + A1 (2013) Chimneys. Metal chimneys. Test methods. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels
16.
Zurück zum Zitat EN 13501-1 + A1 (2009) Fire classification of construction products and building elements. Part 1: classification using data from reaction to fire tests. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels EN 13501-1 + A1 (2009) Fire classification of construction products and building elements. Part 1: classification using data from reaction to fire tests. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers FE, Ohlemiller TJ (1980) Smolder characteristics of flexible polyurethane foams. Fire Flamm 11: 32–44 Rogers FE, Ohlemiller TJ (1980) Smolder characteristics of flexible polyurethane foams. Fire Flamm 11: 32–44
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer K (1957) Smoldering combustion in dusts and fibrous materials. Combust Flame 1: 129CrossRef Palmer K (1957) Smoldering combustion in dusts and fibrous materials. Combust Flame 1: 129CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohlemiller TJ, Lucca DA (1983) An experimental comparison of forward and reverse smolder propagation in permeable fuel beds. Combust Flame 54: 131CrossRef Ohlemiller TJ, Lucca DA (1983) An experimental comparison of forward and reverse smolder propagation in permeable fuel beds. Combust Flame 54: 131CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rein G, Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello AC, Torero JL, Urba DL (2006) Application of genetic algorithms and thermogravimetry to determine the kinetics of polyurethane foam in smoldering combustion. Combust Flame 146:95–108CrossRef Rein G, Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello AC, Torero JL, Urba DL (2006) Application of genetic algorithms and thermogravimetry to determine the kinetics of polyurethane foam in smoldering combustion. Combust Flame 146:95–108CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hidalgo-Medina JP (2015) Performance-based methodology for the fire safe design in energy efficient buildings. Doctoral Thesis. The University of Edinburgh Hidalgo-Medina JP (2015) Performance-based methodology for the fire safe design in energy efficient buildings. Doctoral Thesis. The University of Edinburgh
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kordina K, Meyer-Ottens C (1983) Holz Brandschutz Handbuch. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Holzforschung e.V. ISBN: 3-410-57041-1 Kordina K, Meyer-Ottens C (1983) Holz Brandschutz Handbuch. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Holzforschung e.V. ISBN: 3-410-57041-1
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Matson AF, Dufour RE, Breen JF (1959) Survey of available information on ignition of wood exposed to moderately elevated temperatures, Part II of “Performance of Type B Gas Vents for Gas-Fired Appliances” (Bull. of Research 51). Chicago, Underwriters’ Laboratories, Inc. Matson AF, Dufour RE, Breen JF (1959) Survey of available information on ignition of wood exposed to moderately elevated temperatures, Part II of “Performance of Type B Gas Vents for Gas-Fired Appliances” (Bull. of Research 51). Chicago, Underwriters’ Laboratories, Inc.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen UE (2016) The development of smouldering combustion in combustible building insulation materials. Master Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology Jensen UE (2016) The development of smouldering combustion in combustible building insulation materials. Master Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
28.
Zurück zum Zitat EN ISO 1182 (2010) Reaction to fire tests for products. Non-combustibility test. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN) EN ISO 1182 (2010) Reaction to fire tests for products. Non-combustibility test. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
29.
Zurück zum Zitat EN ISO 1716 (2010) Reaction to fire tests for products. Determination of the gross heat of combustion (calorific value). Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN) EN ISO 1716 (2010) Reaction to fire tests for products. Determination of the gross heat of combustion (calorific value). Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
30.
Zurück zum Zitat EN 13823 + A1 (2014) Reaction to fire tests for building products. Building products excluding floorings exposed to the thermal attack by a single burning item. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN) EN 13823 + A1 (2014) Reaction to fire tests for building products. Building products excluding floorings exposed to the thermal attack by a single burning item. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Commission Decision 96/603/EC (1996) which has been changed by Commission Decisions 2000/605/EC (26 September 2000) and 2003/424/EC (6 June 2003) Commission Decision 96/603/EC (1996) which has been changed by Commission Decisions 2000/605/EC (26 September 2000) and 2003/424/EC (6 June 2003)
32.
Zurück zum Zitat EN 13820 (2003) Thermal insulating materials for building applications. Determination of organic content. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN) EN 13820 (2003) Thermal insulating materials for building applications. Determination of organic content. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
33.
Zurück zum Zitat EN 16733 (2016) Reaction to fire tests for building products. Determination of a building product’s propensity to undergo continuous smouldering. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN) EN 16733 (2016) Reaction to fire tests for building products. Determination of a building product’s propensity to undergo continuous smouldering. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Institut für Brandtechnologie GmbH (2004) Determination and assessment of the continuous glowing combustion behaviour of building products in the SBI test method. Final report. Project Nr. F 040101. BING TC 1831, 71 p Institut für Brandtechnologie GmbH (2004) Determination and assessment of the continuous glowing combustion behaviour of building products in the SBI test method. Final report. Project Nr. F 040101. BING TC 1831, 71 p
Metadaten
Titel
Experimental Study on the Smouldering Combustion of Mineral Wool Insulation in Chimney Penetrations
verfasst von
Perttu Leppänen
Mikko Malaska
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Fire Technology / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0015-2684
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8099
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00849-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Fire Technology 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe