Abstract
Business and operations strategists have long sought to formulate strategies that would serve profitably for a market of one. Two decades after its conception, there is growing evidence that mass customization strategy is transforming into a mass personalization strategy, making the market of one a reality, at least in select industries. The degree of transformation of a company depends on the extent to which its product is soft, i.e., can be produced electronically. Thus, at the lower end of the personalization spectrum are manufacturing companies engaged in producing hard, configurable products, while on the high end of the spectrum are service companies whose product can be totally configured and delivered electronically. The underlying factors that are enabling this transformation, in our view, are: (1) development of information technologies such as peer to peer (P2P), business to consumer (B2C), and Web 2.0, (2) near-universal availability of the Internet, (3) customer willingness and preparedness to be integrated into the process of product co-design and co-creation, (4) modern manufacturing systems, such as flexible manufacturing and, of course, (5) mass customization tools such as modularity and delayed differentiation, which help reduce manufacturing cost and cycle times and (6) deployment of customer-satisfaction-specific software called customer relationship management (CRM) to engender customer retention. Due to the importance and strategic success of affordable personalization, this issue is dedicated to that theme. The articles included in this issue would, I believe, serve as significant decision support mechanisms for companies pursuing a mass customization and personalization strategy. In addition to providing a brief perspective on articles included in this issue, we also summarize the state of the art of mass customization research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As this state-of-the-art section on mass personalization uses examples of companies that have not yet been part of published case studies, most of the material is gleaned from the Internet. No references are, therefore, provided for the material presented in this section. Readers are advised to “google” the companies to verify/improve their perspective on these companies.
References
Alptekinoglu A (2004) Mass customization vs. mass production: variety and price competition. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 6(1):98–103
Balakrishnan PV, Jacob VS (1996) Genetic algorithms for product design. Manage Sci 42(8):1105–1117
(2007) “Breaking the Mold,” Business Week, April 21
Chen S, Tseng MM (2007) Aligning demand and supply flexibilities in custom Product co-design. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 19(4)
Davis SM (1987) Future perfect. Adison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Eppen G (1979) Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Manage Sci 25(5):498–501
Ferdows K, DeMeyer A (1990) Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: in search of a new theory. J Oper Manage 9(2):168–184
Garg A, Tang CS (1997) On postponement strategies for product families with multiple points of differentiation. IIE Trans 29(8):641–650
Jiao RJ, Xu Q, Du J, Zhang Y, Helander M, Khalid HM, Helo P, Ni C (2007) An analytical approach to affective design with ambient intelligence for mass customization and personalization. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 19(4)
Kotler P (1967) Marketing management analysis, planning and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall
Kotler P (1989) From mass marketing to mass customization. Planning Rev 17(5):10–13
Kumar A (1995) Risk-pooling along a fixed delivery route using a dynamic inventory allocation policy. Manage Sci 41(2):344–360
Kumar A (2004) Mass Customization: Metrics and Modularity. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 16(4):287–312
Kumar A, Gattoufi S, Reisman A (2007) Taxonomic and Content Analyses of Research Strategies and Application Intensity of Mass Customization Publications (1987–2006). Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 19(4c)
Kumar A, Stecke KE (2007) Measuring the effectiveness of a mass customization and personalization strategy: a market and organizational-capability based index. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst (19)4b
Kumar A, Piller F, Williams HJ (2006) Mass Customization: shattering strategic myths, assumptions. Grand Rapids Business J 24
Lee H, Tang C (1997) Modeling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Manage Sci 43(1):40–53
Leyuan S, Ólafsson S, Qun C (2001) An optimization framework for product design. Manage Sci 47(12):1681–1692
McCarthy JE (1960) Basic marketing: a managerial approach, Irwin. Homewood, IL
O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Tim O’Reilly Newsletter, September 30. http://www.tim.oreilly.com
Piller FT (2007) Observations on the present and future of mass customization. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 19(4)
Piller FT, Kumar A (2006) For each, their own. Indus Eng 38(9):40–45
Pine BJ (1992) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Pine BJ (1993) Mass customizing products and services. Planning Rev 22(4):6–14
II Pine BJ, Gilmore J (1999) The experience economy: work is theatre & every business a stage. HBS Press, Boston, MA
II Pine BJ, Gilmore J (2007) Authenticity what consumers really want. HBS Press, Boston, MA
Pine BJ, Bart V, Boynton AC (1993) Making mass customization work. Harvard Business Rev 71(5):108–118
Schwarz LB (1989) Model for assessing the value of warehouse risk-pooling over outside supplier leadtime. Manage Sci 35(8):828–842
Skinner W (1974) The focused factory. Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp 113–121
Smith WR (1956) Product differentiation and marketing segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Assoc J Market, vol 21, pp. 3–8
Tayur S, Ganeshan R, Magazine M (1999) Quantitative models for supply chain management. Kluwer International Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA
Toffler A (1970) Future shock. Bodley Head Press, London
Toffler A (1984) The third wave. Bantam Press, London
Wilson J (2007) Mass customization and build to order practices: an engineering perspective. Cincom Systems Report
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A. From mass customization to mass personalization: a strategic transformation. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 19, 533–547 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-008-9048-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-008-9048-6