Abstract
We analyse the way in which the principle that ‘the whole is greater than the sum of its parts’ manifests itself with phenomena of visual perception. For this investigation we use insights and techniques coming from quantum cognition, and more specifically we are inspired by the correspondence of this principle with the phenomenon of the conjunction effect in human cognition. We identify entities of meaning within artefacts of visual perception and rely on how such entities are modelled for corpuses of texts such as the webpages of the World-Wide Web for our study of how they appear in phenomena of visual perception. We identify concretely the conjunction effect in visual artefacts and analyse its structure in the example of a photograph. We also analyse quantum entanglement between different aspects of meaning in artefacts of visual perception. We confirm its presence by showing that well elected experiments on images retrieved accordingly by Google Images give rise to probabilities and expectation values violating the Clauser Horne Shimony Holt version of Bell’s inequalities. We point out how this approach can lead to a mathematical description of the meaning content of a visual artefact such as a photograph.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aerts, D. (1998). The entity and modern physics: The creation-discovery view of reality. In E. Castellani (Ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics (pp. 223–257). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aerts, D. (2009a). Quantum structure in cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 314–348.
Aerts, D. (2009b). Quantum particles as conceptual entities: A possible explanatory framework for quantum theory. Foundations of Science, 14, 361–411.
Aerts, D. (2010a). Interpreting quantum particles as conceptual entities. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 49, 2950–2970.
Aerts, D. (2010b). A potentiality and conceptuality interpretation of quantum physics. Philosophica, 83, 15–52.
Aerts, D., Aerts, J. A., Beltran, L., Beltran, L., Distrito, I., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2017a). Towards a quantum World-Wide Web. Submitted to Theoretical Computer Science. Preprint at ArXiv:1703.06642 [cs.AI].
Aerts, D., Aerts, J. A., Beltran, L., Distrito, I., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S., et al. (2017b). Context and interference effects in the combinations of natural concepts. CONTEXT 2017: Modeling and Using Context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10257, 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_54.
Aerts, D., Aerts, J. A., Beltran, L., Beltran, L., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S., et al. (2017c). Testing quantum models of conjunction fallacy on the World-Wide Web. International Journal of Theoretical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-017-3288-8.
Aerts, D., Aerts, J. A., Beltran, L., Geriente, S., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S., et al. (2017d). Spin and wind directions I: Identifying entanglement in nature and cognition. Foundations of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9528-9.
Aerts, D., Aerts, J. A., Beltran, L., Geriente, S., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S., et al. (2017e). Spin and wind directions II: A Bell state quantum model. Foundations of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9530-2.
Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., & Gabora, L. (2011). A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 136–146.
Aerts, D., & Coecke, B. (1999). The creation-discovery-view: towards a possible explanation of quantum reality. In M. L. Dalla Chiara, R. Giuntini, & F. Laudisa (Eds.), Language, quantum, music: Selected contributed papers of the tenth international congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science, Florence, August 1995. Dordrecht: Springer.
Aerts, D., & Czachor, M. (2004). Quantum aspects of semantic analysis and symbolic artificial intelligence. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 37, L123–L132.
Aerts, D., & Gabora, L. (2005a). A theory of concepts and their combinations I. The structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes, 34, 192–221.
Aerts, D., & Gabora, L. (2005b). A theory of concepts and their combinations II. A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes, 34, 167–191.
Aerts, D., Gabora, L., & Sozzo, S. (2013). Concepts and their dynamics: A quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 737–772.
Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2015a). The unreasonable success of quantum probability I: Quantum measurements as uniform fluctuations. Journal Mathematical Psychology, 67, 51–75.
Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2015b). The unreasonable success of quantum probability II: Quantum measurements as universal measurements. Journal Mathematical Psychology, 67, 76–90.
Aerts, D., & Sozzo, S. (2011). Quantum structure in cognition: Why and how concepts are entangled. Quantum Interaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7052, 116–127.
Aerts, D., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2015a). Quantum structure in cognition and the foundations of human reasoning. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 54, 4557–4569.
Aerts, D., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2015b). Quantum structure of negation and conjunction in human thought. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1447.
Aerts, D., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2015c). A new fundamental evidence of non-classical structure in the combination of natural concepts. Philosophical Trasactions of the Royal Society A, 374, 20150095.
Aerts J. A. (2017a). Eigengrau. End Work Master Thesis. KASK, Ghent, Belgium.
Aerts J. A. (2017b). Gestalten van Emergentie in Visuele Perceptie. Een Zoektocht in Kunst en Wetenschap. Master Thesis. KASK, Ghent, Belgium.
Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1981). Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem. Physical Review Letters, 47, 460–463.
Bell, J. S. (1987). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Busemeyer, J., & Bruza, P. (2012). Quantum models of cognition and decision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Busemeyer, J. R., Pothos, E. M., Franco, R., & Trueblood, J. S. (2011). A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Psychological Review, 118, 193–218.
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969). Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters, 23, 880–884.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777–780.
Feynman, R. (1965). The character of physical law. New York: Modern Library. See Chapter 6, Probability and Uncertainty—The Quantum Mechanical View of Nature, p. 129.
Gabora, L., & Kitto, K. (2016). Towards a quantum theory of humour. Frontiers in Physics, 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2016.00053.
Hampton, J. A. (1988). Overextension of conjunctive concepts: Evidence for a unitary model for concept typicality and class inclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 12–32.
Haven, E., & Khrennikov, A. (2013). Quantum social science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heisenberg, W. (1969). Der Teil und das Ganze: Gespräche im Umkreis der Atomphysik. Munchen: Piper Verlag GmbH.
Khrennikov, A. (2010). Ubiquitous quantum structure: From psychology to finances. Berlin: Springer.
Moro, R. (2009). On the nature of the conjunction fallacy. Synthese, 171, 1–24.
Osherson, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition, 9, 35–58.
Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2009). A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 2171–2178.
Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013). Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 255–274.
Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2011). Ephemeral properties and the illusion of microscopic particles. Foundations of Science, 16, 393–409.
Sozzo, S. (2014). A quantum probability explanation in Fock space for borderline contradictions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 58, 1–12.
Sozzo, S. (2015). Conjunction and negation of natural concepts: A quantum-theoretic modeling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 66, 83–102.
Trueblood, J. S., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2011). A quantum probability account of order effects in inference. Cognitive Science, 35, 1518–1552.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgments of and by representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgements
I want to thank Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Sandro Sozzo and Tomas Veloz for their continuous support and their valuable comments on the draft versions of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arguëlles, J.A. The Heart of an Image: Quantum Superposition and Entanglement in Visual Perception. Found Sci 23, 757–778 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9547-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9547-1