Skip to main content
Log in

Improving the fracture toughness of 3D printed thermoplastic polymers by fused deposition modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work describes a new filament deposition in fused deposition modeling process through criterion based on mechanical stress. This criterion requires that the filaments’ directions to follow the principal directions of the stress in the sample. The article also presents several Crack-test specimens that have been printed with and without respect to this criterion. The fracture behavior of these specimens has been investigated. The results show that criterion leads to an improvement of 30% in the fracture toughness. Digital image correlation has been extensively used to study the local strain field in the specimens. The strain cartographies reveal a drastic change in fracture behavior. The modification of filament direction leads to “ductile-like behavior” in crack extension which is characterized by a large deformation zone associated with a slow crack growth rate during the crack propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The high displacement gradient between the crack lips leads to irrelevant high strain if the crack located subsets are not removed.

References

  • Abramovitch H, Burgard M, Edery-Azulay L, Evans KE, Hoffmeister M, Miller W, Scarpa F, Smith CW, Tee KF (2010) Smart tetrachiral and hexachiral honeycomb: sensing and impact detection. Compos Sci Technol 70(7):1072–1079 Special issue on Chiral Smart Honeycombs

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn SH, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright Paul K (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling abs. Rapid Prototyp J 8(4):248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics fundamentals and applications. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaman JJ, Barlow JW, Bourell DL, Crawford RH, Marcus Harris L, McAlea Kevin P (1997) Solid freeform fabrication: a new direction in manufacturing, vol 2061. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 25–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellini A, Güçeri S (2003) Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 9(4):252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaber J, Adair B, Antoniou A (2015) Ncorr: open-source 2d digital image correlation matlab software. Exp Mech 55(6):1105–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee E08 (2001) Standard test method for measurment of fracture toughness. In: Annual Book of ASTM standard, 03.01(E1820-01)

  • Crump SS (1992) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. US Patent 5,121,329

  • Crump SS (1994) Modeling apparatus for three-dimensional objects. US Patent 5,340,433

  • Galantucci LM, Lavecchia F, Percoco G (2008) Study of compression properties of topologically optimized fdm made structured parts. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 57(1):243–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardan J (2016) Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. Int J Prod Res 54(10):3118–3132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardan N, Schneider A, Gardan J (2016) Material and process characterization for coupling topological optimization to additive manufacturing. Comput-Aided Des Appl 13(Supplement C):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Harilal R, Ramji M (2014) Adaptation of open source 2d dic software ncorr for solid mechanics applications. In: 9th International symposium on advanced science and technology in experimental mechanics

  • Lee BH, Abdullah J, Khan ZA (2005) Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible abs object. J Mater Process Technol 169(1):54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone E, Lipson H (2007) Fab@ home: the personal desktop fabricator kit. Rapid Prototyp J 13(4):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller W, Smith CW, Scarpa F, Evans KE (2010) Flatwise buckling optimization of hexachiral and tetrachiral honeycombs. Compos Sci Technol 70(7):1049–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero M, Roundy S, Odell D, Ahn SH, Wright PK (2001) Material characterization of fused deposition modelling (FDM) ABS by designed experiments. In: Rapid prototyping and manufacturing conference, Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME), Cincinnati, OH, 15–17 May 2001

  • Pan B, Xie H, Guo Z, Hua T (2007) Full-field strain measurement using a two-dimensional savitzky-golay digital differentiator in digital image correlation. Opt Eng 46(3):033601–033601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prall D, Lakes RS (1997) Properties of a chiral honeycomb with a poisson’s ratio of1. Int J Mech Sci 39(3):305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaie R, Badrossamay M, Ghaie A, Moosavi H (2013) Topology optimization for fused deposition modeling process. Procedia CIRP, 6 Suppl C:521–526. In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP conference on electro physical and chemical machining (ISEM)

  • Vesenjak M, Krstulović-Opara L, Ren Z, Domazet Z (2010) Cell shape effect evaluation of polyamide cellular structures. Polymer Test 29(8):991–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemian C, Sharma M, Ziemian S (2012) Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Mech Eng 23:167–180. https://doi.org/10.5772/34233

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Gardan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gardan, J., Makke, A. & Recho, N. Improving the fracture toughness of 3D printed thermoplastic polymers by fused deposition modeling. Int J Fract 210, 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-017-0257-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-017-0257-4

Keywords

Navigation