Skip to main content
Log in

Enclosure of the urban commons

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is an essay about the territorial enclosure of urban neighbourhoods. It develops the argument that the shared public realms that became regarded as normal in the cities of the 20th century are inherently unstable. More particularly, they are an unstable form of co-ownership domain (condominium). In many different cultures and economies new forms of local territorial governance are emerging to make joint consumption more sustainable. Most of the essay is devoted to exploring this evolutionary argument and is theoretically oriented and illustrated with historical examples. We end with illustrations of urban enclosure from China, a country that has had to discover almost overnight new forms of organisational, institutional and spatial order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A. A. & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property rights paradigm. Journal of Economic History, 3(1), 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, T. S. (1972). [1955]: An Economic History of England: The Eighteenth Century. London: Methuen.

  • Barzel, Y. (1982). Measurement cost and the organisation of markets. Journal of Law and Economics, 25, 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, A. (1963). The effect of the common ownership of land upon resource allocation in Tripolitania. Land Economics, 40, 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32 (125), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark L. (2003). Parents pay £70,000 premium for houses in shrinking school catchment area. Daily Mail July 8, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. & Crampton, E. (2004). Market Failure or Success: The New Debate. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1964). The exchange and enforcement of property rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foldvary F. (1994). Public goods and private communities. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, K. (1999). Indian Reservation in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasze, G., Webster, C. J., & Frantz, K. (Eds.) (2005). Private Cities: Local and Global Perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, C. (1999). Retail location analysis. In: M. Pacione (Ed.), Applied Geography: Principles and Practice (pp. 450–462). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire County Council (2002). In Suburbia. Hampshire, UK: Hampshire CC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248, reprinted in Baker S. and Elliott C., 1990: Readings in Public Sector Economics. Heath, Lexington, MA, pp. 111–123.

  • Hayek, F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E. (1965). Garden Cities of To-Morrow. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. T. (1995). Encyclopedia of New York City. Cambridge, MA: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. (2004). Victorian London. London: New Holland Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoschka, J. M., & Borsdorf, A. (2005). A Condominios fechados and Barrios privados: The rise of private residential neighbourhoods in Latin America. In: G. Glasze, C. J. Webster, & K. Frantz (Eds.), Private Cities: Local and Global Perspectives (pp. 92–108). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janvier, T. A. (2000). In Old New York: A Classic History of New York City. New York: St. Martins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankevich, G. J. (1999). American Metropolis: A History of New York City. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. (2003). Taipei 101 – The world’s tallest building is in Taiwan. Taipei Fun Magazine. November. http://www.taiwanfun.com/north/taipei/articles/0311/0311CoverStory.htm accessed 11th May 2005.

  • Liu, J. (2003). Bai Bu Ting Residential District. In: C. Webster (Ed.), Public-private partnerships in urban infrastructure and service delivery (pp. 57–59). Bangkok: UNESCAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. (2003). Behind the gates: Life, security and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D. & Sigelman, L. (1981). Understanding the tax revolt: Eight explanations. The American Political Science Review, 75(4), 963–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, S. (1970). The Art of Community. Menlo Park CA: Institute for Humane Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, E. (2003). Common interest housing in the communities of tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate 14(1–2), 203–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, E. (2005). The dynamics of privatopia: private residential governance in the USA. In: G. Glasze, C. J. Webster, & K. Frantz (Eds.), Gated Communities: Local and Global Perspectives (pp. 9–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises L. (1966). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 3rd revision, Chicago: Contemporary.

  • Mudambi, R. (Ed). (2003). Privatisation and Globalisation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mycoo, M. (2006). The retreat of the upper and middle classes to gated communities in the post-structural adjustment era: The case of Trinidad. Environment and Planning A, 38(1), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1999). Privatizing the neighbourhood: A proposal to replace zoning with private collective property rights to existing neighbourhoods. George Mason Law Review 7(4), 827–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacion, M. (2001). Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1974). The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 350–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoard, M. (1997). This land is our land: The struggle for Britain’s countryside. Stroud: Gaia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuffield, J. (2004). Building a theory of residual space (www.urbanresidue.com).

  • Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugaz, C. & Waddams-Price, C. (Eds.) (2003). Utility Privatisation and Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. J. (2002). Property rights and the public realm: Gates, green belts and gemeinschaft. Environment and Planning B, 29(3), 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. J., Glasze, G., & Frantz, K. (2002). The global spread of gated communities. Editorial. Environment and Planning B, 29(3), 315–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. J. (2003a). The nature of the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 40(13), 2591–2612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C.J. (Ed.) (2003b). Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructure & Service Delivery. UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, UN Building, Rajdamnern Nok Avenue, Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Webster C. J. & Lai L. W. C. (2003). Property rights, planning and markets: Managing spontaneous cities. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. J., Wu, F., & Zhao, Y. (2005). China’s modern walled cities. In: G. Glasze, C. J. Webster, & K. Frantz (Eds.), Private cities: Local and global perspectives (pp. 153–169). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2004a). Residential relocation under market-oriented redevelopment: The process and outcomes in urban China. Geoforum, 35, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2004b). Transplanting cityscapes: The use of imagined globalization in housing commodification. Area, 36(3), 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. & Webber, K. (2004). The rise of “foreign gated communities” in Beijing: Between economic globalization and local institutions. Cities, 21(3), 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T. (2001). Decentralization, localization, and the emergence of a quasi-participatory decision-making structure in urban development in Shanghai. International Planning Studies, 7(4), 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S., Webster, C. Enclosure of the urban commons. GeoJournal 66, 27–42 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-006-9014-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-006-9014-3

Keywords

Navigation