Skip to main content
Log in

The future of containerization: perspectives from maritime and inland freight distribution

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As containerization enters its peak growth years, its potential future developments over maritime and inland freight transport systems are being questioned. A series of issues can either further accelerate the adoption of containerization worldwide or, alternatively, could impose an upper limit to the extraordinary contribution that containers have implied for logistics systems and global commodity chains. These mainly include macro-economic, technical/operational and governance factors. Future containerization will be largely determined by interactions within and between four domains ranging from a functional to a spatial perspective. The logistical domain involves the functional organization of transport chains and their integration in supply chains. The transport domain involves the operation of transport services and intermodal operations. The infrastructural domain involves the provision and management of basic infrastructure for both links and nodes in the transport system. The locational domain relates to the geographical location of nodes and sites in the economic space and forms a basic element for their intrinsic accessibility in terms of centrality or intermediacy. It is underlined that the future of containerization will dominantly be shaped by inland transport systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel, J. H., Marchetti, C., & Meyer, P. (1998). Toward green mobility: The evolution of transport. European Review, 6(2), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cariou, P. (2003). “Dedicated terminals in container ports: A cost-benefit analysis”, research seminar: Maritime Transport Globalisation. Le Havre: Regional Integration and Territorial Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N., Hess, M., Yeung, H., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004). Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 468–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeck, C., Notteboom, T., Verbeke, A., & Winkelmans, W. (1996). Back to the future: An evaluation of traffic forecasting techniques used in Antwerp and Rotterdam. In W. Winkelmans & T. Notteboom (Eds.), The issues of prognoses in maritime transport and seaport production in Belgium and Poland (pp. 3–26). Leuven: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudahy, B. J. (2006). Box boats: How container ships changed the world. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K, Khanna, M & Song, D-W. (1999). How big is beautiful: Economies of scale and the optimal size of containership. Proceedings of the IAME 1999 conference. Halifax, pp. 108–140.

  • De Monie, G. (1997). The global economy, very large containerships and the funding of mega hubs. Port Finance Conference June 26–27, June 26–27, London.

  • Dicken, P., & Lloyd, P. E. (1990). Location in space: Theoretical perspectives in economic geography (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewry Shipping Consultants. (2007). World container trade and port volumes. Annual container market review and forecast – 2007/08. London: Nigel Gardiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPO. (2006). ESPO annual report 2006–2007. Brussels: ESPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, P., & Morvillo, A. (2000). Logistical integration and co-operative strategies in liner shipping: Some empirical evidence. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. (1980). A critique of the super port idea. Maritime Policy and Management, 7, 77–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. (1999). The size economies and network efficiency of large containerships. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 1, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. G. (1998). Stability and competition in intermodal container shipping: Finding a balance. Maritime Policy and Management, 25, 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaver, T. (2002). The evolving roles of shipping lines in international logistics. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 4, 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. (2002). Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), 436–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, M., & Yeung, H. (2006). Whither global production networks in economic geography? Past, present, and future. Environment and Planning A, 38(7), 1193–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2006). Guest editorial: Transportation and global production networks. Growth and Change, 37, 599–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, B., Eenhuizen, J. (2004). A framework for the analysis of seaport-based logistics parks. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Logistics Strategies for Ports, Dalian, Dalian University Press, pp. 151–171.

  • Lim, S.-M. (1998). Economies of scale in container shipping. Maritime Policy and Management, 25, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. (2005). Intermodal freight transport. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merckx, F. (2006). The impact of dwell times on container terminal capacity. In T. Notteboom (Ed.), Ports are more than piers (pp. 399–422). Anwerp: De Lloyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2002). Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry. Maritime Policy and Management, 29, 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2006). The time factor in liner shipping services. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2005). Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2007). Re-assessing port-hinterland relationships in the context of global supply chains. In J. Wang, D. Olivier, T. Notteboom & B. Slack (Eds.), Ports, cities, and global supply chains (pp. 51–68). London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., Vernimmen, B. (2008). The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. Jourrnal of Transport Geography. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.05.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, D., & Slack, B. (2006). Rethinking the port. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1409–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. (1998). Asian hub/feeder nets: The dynamics of restructuring. Maritime Policy and Management, 25, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue, J.-P. (2006). Transportation and the geographical and functional integration of global production networks. Growth and Change, 37(4), 510–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theo Notteboom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Notteboom, T., Rodrigue, JP. The future of containerization: perspectives from maritime and inland freight distribution. GeoJournal 74, 7–22 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9211-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9211-3

Keywords

Navigation