Skip to main content
Log in

Using local knowledge to improve understanding of groundwater supplies in parts of arid South Australia

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing a good working knowledge of water in the landscape and the connectivity between surface and groundwater is germane to a resilient sustainable water supply to sustain human activities and a healthy environment, particularly in the drier parts of Australia. This paper presents a case study in the semi-arid Flinders Ranges of South Australia in which eliciting local knowledge from landholders was a key element in mapping surface and groundwater and investigating the connectivity between water resources. Local landholders provided a vital source of information to augment the limited scientific data initially available on groundwater resources. Groundwater recharge in the region comes from local rainfall onto individual unconnected groundwater catchments. In most of the region water supply seems to have been maintained over the longer term but there are a number of sites where former active springs are now dry or much reduced in size and water supplies from bores have substantially changed in quantity and quality. The involvement of landholders in the investigation of water resources encouraged them to consider the resource context of their stock watering points and incorporate more science into their understanding of the water resources that they rely on. This stimulated interest in investigating more about local water resources and changes in water management practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As the study proceeded it became clear that the knowledge held by the local indigenous people would reflect a much longer timeframe and would therefore be a very valuable addition. A proposal to do this has been developed.

  2. The study was conducted during a period of institutional change. For convenience, we refer to ‘natural resource management groups’ throughout although the equivalent bodies had a different name at the start of the study. Natural resource management groups are local advisory bodies of the South Australian Arid Lands Regional NRM Board which has statutory powers for water resource management and other functions in northern South Australia under the Natural Resource Management Act 2005 [SA]. The groups are successors to local Soil Conservation Boards that existed under the Soil Conservation and Landcare Act 1989 [SA] and were disbanded in 2005. The members of these Boards were local landowners appointed by the Minister to act as the interface between government and community. These Boards had statutory powers to produce a District Soil Conservation plan and then to implement policies and programs specified in the plan. In the study area much of the function, but not the statutory powers, of the former Northern Flinders District Soil Conservation Board was assumed by the Northern Flinders District Group. As a natural resource management group, it works with the NRM Board under the Natural Resource Management Act, 2005.

References

  • Arid Areas Catchment Water Management Board. (2006). Arid areas catchment water management plan—volume 2 state of the catchment. Port Augusta: South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resource Management Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian National Water Commission. (2007). Key findings of the level 2 assessment of the national water resources for the national water initiative. Canberra: Australian Government, Water Resources 2005. Retrieved 10 May 2007, from http://www.water.gov.au/Publications/AWR2005_Level_2_Findings_Brochure.pdf.

  • Boulton, A. J. (2005). Chances and challenges in the conservation of groundwater and their dependent ecosystems. Aquatic Conservation: Marine & Freshwater Ecosystems, 15, 319–323. doi:10.1002/aqc.712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2006). The Australian natural resource management knowledge system. Canberra: Australian Government Printer. Retrieved 30 May 2007, from http://products.lwa.gov.au/files/PR061081.pdf.

  • Davies, J. (1999). More than us and them: Local knowledges and sustainable management of Australian rangelands. In D. Eldridge & D. Freundenberger (Eds.), People and rangelands: Building the future: Proceedings of the VI International Rangelands Congress, Townsville, Queensland (Vol 2, pp. 61–66). Aitkenvale, QLD: VI International Rangeland Congress Inc.

  • Deuble, R. (2005). Dieback of the river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.) population of the central Flinders Ranges, South Australia. Honours Dissertation, School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia.

  • Evans, R. (2007). The impact of groundwater use on Australia’s rivers. Canberra: Land and Water Australia. Retrieved 30 May 2007, from http://products.lwa.gov.au/files/PR071282.pdf.

  • Faust, B., & Smardon, R. (2001). Introduction and overview: Environmental knowledge, rights, and ethics: Co-managing with communities. Environmental Science & Policy, 4(4–5), 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goonan, P., Madden, C., McEvoy, P., & Taylor, D. (2003). River health in the Flinders Ranges. River Health Initiative. Adelaide: Environment Protection Authority and Dept. of Environment and Heritage, South Australian Government. Retrieved 29 April 2007, from http://www.environment.gov.au/water/publications/environmental/rivers/nrhp/health/pubs/flinders.pdf.

  • Jansen, A., & Robertson, A. (2001a). Relationships between livestock management and the ecological condition of riparian habitats along an Australian floodplain river. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 63–75. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00557.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A., & Robertson, A. (2001b). Riparian bird communities in relation to land management practices in floodplain woodlands of south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 100, 173–185. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00235-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, J., James, C., Maconochie, J., Nicholls, A., Stol, J., & Tynan, R. (2003). Abundance and composition of plant species along grazing gradients in Australian rangelands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 1008–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00862.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M., Cheers, B., & Morrison, T. (2005). Regionalized natural resource management in South Australia: Prospects and challenges of the new regime. South Australian Geographical Journal, 104, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudd, G. (2000). Mound springs of the Great Artesian Basin in South Australia: A case study from Olympic Dam. Environmental Geology, 39, 463–476. doi:10.1007/s002540050452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B., Hose, G., Eamus, D., & Licari, D. (2006). Valuation of groundwater-dependent ecosystems: A functional methodology incorporating ecosystem services. Australian Journal of Botany, 54, 221–229. doi:10.1071/BT05018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B., Zeppel, M., Hose, G., & Eamus, D. (2003). Groundwater-dependent ecosystems in Australia: It’s more than just water for rivers. Ecological Management & Restoration, 4, 110–113. doi:10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00144.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R., & Decamps, H. (1997). The ecology of interface: Riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 621–658. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (1991). Conservation of River Red Gums (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) in the Flinders Ranges. Adelaide: Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J., Stafford Smith, D., Lambin, E., Turner, B., I. I., Mortimore, M., Batterbury, S., et al. (2007). Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development. Science, 316, 847–851. doi:10.1126/science.1131634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabacchi, E., Correll, D., Hauer, R., Pinay, G., Planty-Tabachy, A., & Wissmar, R. (1998). Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape. Freshwater Biology, 40, 497–516. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00381.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treglown, K. (2006). Testing and modifying an Index of Riparian Spring Condition in the Central Flinders Ranges. Honours Dissertation, School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia.

  • Walton, H. (2005). Threats to riparian spring condition: Developing and applying an index of riparian spring condition in the central Flinders Ranges. Honours Dissertation, School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project that forms the background to this paper was supported by an Australian Government Natural Heritage Trust grant administered by the South Australian Arid Lands NRM Board. The authors are also grateful to the reviewers who provided many helpful suggestions for ways to improve the content.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, I., Brake, L. Using local knowledge to improve understanding of groundwater supplies in parts of arid South Australia. GeoJournal 74, 441–450 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9236-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9236-7

Keywords

Navigation