Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Indigenous perspectives of climate change and its effects upon subsistence activities in the Arctic: the case of the Nets’aii Gwich’in

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the relationship between climate change and subsistence behaviors of indigenous peoples in Arctic regions of North America. It is noted that those most affected by such change are, typically, those peoples who continue to carry out subsistence practices through which they acquire a significant percentage of food from the land. It is these very peoples who also may offer valuable observations about changes which they are personally witnessing. A case study example, the Nets’aii Gwich’in community of Arctic Village, Alaska, is presented. Using Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and villagers’ observations as the primary data source, it is shown that levels of subsistence activity in this community are decreasing. Villagers believe that climate changes are playing a key role in the ability to access country foods. They believe too that there are fewer animals and that the food now available is of poorer quality than in the past. It is concluded that the information and data presented here concerning villager perceptions should be viewed as only part of the explanation for changes in subsistence behaviors. More research in the coming years is called for to further help distinguish the impacts of climate change upon subsistence activities from other social and economic forces which also are playing a role in such indigenous communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to data gathered in the 2006, approximately a fifth of the children in the village lived in female-run, single parent homes. This statistic parallels the National average for that year (see Table CH-1 at www.census.go/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html).

References

  • Adams, F. J., Tanner, T. L., & Nelson, M. A. (2005). Harvest and biological characteristics of the subsistence fishery in Arctic village, Alaska, 20012003. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2005-18.

  • Alaska-Canada caribou herd strongly rebounds. Fairbanks Daily-Newsminer. 2 March 2011. Available at http://www.newsminer.com/view/full_story/12137265/article-Alaska-Canada-caribou-herd-strongly-rebounds. Accessed 6 June 2011.

  • Basso, K. H. (1972). Ice and travel among the Fort Norman Slave: Folk taxonomies and cultural rules. Language in Society, 1, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective. In J. T. Inglis (Ed.), Traditional ecological knowledge: Concepts and cases (pp. 1–9). Ottawa: Canadian Museum of Nature and the International Development Research Centre.

  • Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.

  • Berkes, F. (2002). Epilogue: Making sense of Arctic environmental change? In I. Krupnik & D. Jolly (Eds.), The Earth is faster now: Indigenous observations of Arctic environmental change (pp. 335–49). Washington, DC: Arctic Research Consortium of the United States, Smithsonian Institution.

  • Berman, M., & Kofinas, G. (2004). Hunting for models: Grounded and rational choice approaches to analyzing climate effects on subsistence hunting in an Arctic community. Ecological Economic, 49, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M., Nicholson, C., Kofinas, G., Tetlichi, J., & Martin, S. (2004). Adaptation and sustainability in a Small Arctic Community: Results of an agent-based simulation model. Arctic, 57(4), 401–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • BoatShopAK.com. Personal communication. 18 October 2010.

  • Centre for Traditional Knowledge. (1997). Guidelines for environmental assessments and traditional knowledge. Hull, QC: Canadian International Development Agency.

  • Chabot, M. (2003). Economic changes, household strategies, and social relations of contemporary Nunavik Inuit. Polar Record, 39(208), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate change taking a toll on the Arctic. Podcast transcript from National Public Radio, Science Friday—Talk of the Nation with Ira Flato. 11 September 2009. Available at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112752241. Accessed 14 September 2009.

  • Craver, A. (2001). Inupiaq Eskimo household structure: Social organization and domestic function. Unpublished paper presented at the fourth congress of the International Arctic Social Sciences Association, Quebec City, Quebec.

  • Dinero, S. C. (2003a). Analysis of a ‘Mixed Economy’ in an Alaskan native settlement: The case of Arctic village. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 1(XXIII), 135–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinero, S. C. (2003b). ‘The Lord Will Provide’: The history and role of episcopalian christianity in Nets’aii Gwich’in social development—Arctic village, Alaska. Indigenous Nations Studies Journal, 4(1), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinero, S. C. (2005). Globalization and development in a post-nomadic hunter/gatherer village: The case of Arctic village, Alaska. The Northern Review (25/26), 135–160.

  • Dinero, S. C. (2007). Globalisation and development in a post-nomadic hunter/gatherer Alaskan village: A follow-up assessment. Polar Record, 43(226), 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinero, S. C. (2010). ‘The Ecological Indian’ revisited: Evidence from the Arctic. Unpublished draft presented at the twelfth international association for the study of traditional environments conference, Beirut, Lebanon.

  • Dowsley, M. (2009). Community clusters in wildlife and environmental management: Using TEK and community involvement to improve co-management in an era of rapid environmental change. Polar Research, 28(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J., Smit, B., Wandel, J., Allurut, M., Shappa, K., Ittusarjuat, H., et al. (2008). Climate change in the Arctic: Current and future vulnerability in two Inuit communities in Canada. The Geographical Journal, 174(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. (2004). When the weather is Uggianaqtuq: Inuit observations of environmental change. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder.

  • Freeman, M. M. R. (1984). Contemporary Inuit exploitation of the sea-ice environment. In Sikumiut: “The people who use the sea ice” (pp. 73–96). Ottawa: Canadian Arctic Resources Committee.

  • Furgal, C., & Seguin, J. (2006). Climate change, health, and vulnerability in Canadian Northern Aboriginal Communities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(12), 1964–1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitay, H., Suarez, A., Watson, R., & Dokken, D. J. (2002). Climate change and biodiversity. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Technical Paper V.

  • Gustafson, J. (2004). Traditional ecological knowledge of subsistence harvests and fishes, Old John Lake, Arctic Village, Alaska. Federal Subsistence Fishery Monitoring Program, Final Project Report No. FIS01-003. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Office of Subsistence Management, Fisheries Resource Monitoring Program, Fishery Information Service, Anchorage, Alaska.

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, S. (1999). Arctic village local council member. Personal communication.

  • Kassam, K.-A., & The Wainwright Traditional Council. (2000). Passing on the knowledge: Mapping human ecology in Wainwright, Alaska. Calgary, Canada: Arctic Institute of North America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofinas, G. (2002). Community contributions to ecological monitoring: Knowledge co-production in the U.S.-Canada Arctic Borderlands. In I. Krupnik & D. Jolly (Eds.), The Earth is faster now: Indigenous observations of Arctic environmental change (pp. 55–91). Washington, DC: Arctic Research Consortium of the United States, Smithsonian Institution.

  • McBeath, J., & Shepro, C. (2007). The effects of environmental change on an Arctic native community: Evaluation using local cultural perceptions. American Indian Quarterly, 31(1), 44–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, M., Berkes, F., Forbes, B., Kofinas, G., Vlassova, T., & Wenzel, G. (2005). Hunting, herding, fishing, and gathering: Indigenous peoples and renewable resource use in the Arctic. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment—Scientific Report. ACIA—Arctic Climate Impact Assessment and Cambridge University Press, pp. 649–90.

  • Paci, C. D. J., Dickson, C., Nickels, S., Chan, L., & Furgal, C. (2004). Food security of Northern indigenous peoples in a time of uncertainty. Northern Research Forum position paper presented for the 3rd NRF Open Meeting in Yellowknife and Rae Edzo, Canada.

  • Post, E., et al. (2009). Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science, 325(5946), 1355–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, W. O. (1984). Snow and living things. In R. Olson, F. Geddes, & R. Hastings (Eds.), Northern ecology and resource management (pp. 51–77). Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattenbury, K., Kielland, K., Finstad, G., & Schneider, W. (2009). A reindeer herder’s perspective on caribou, weather and socio-economic change on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Polar Research, 28(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedlinger, D. (2001). Responding to climate change in Northern communities: Impacts and adaptations. Arctic, 54(1), 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riewe, R. (1991). Inuit use of the sea ice. Arctic and Alpine Research, 23(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, C. (2010). Kiavallakkikput Agviq (Into the Whaling Cycle): Cetaceousness and climate change among the Inupiat of Arctic Alaska. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(4), 1003–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census data. Available at www.census.go/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html. Accessed 24 February 2011.

  • Wenzel, G. W. (2009). Canadian Inuit subsistence and ecological instability-if the climate changes, must the Inuit? Polar Research, 28(1), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A previous version of this article was presented at the International Geographical Union in Tel Aviv, Israel, July 15, 2010. Travel funding to Tel Aviv was provided by an American Association of GeographersNational Science Foundation Fund Travel Grant. Additional funding for this study also was provided by Philadelphia University. My thanks to two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of the article. Lastly, special thanks to Dolores Pfeuffer-Scherer for her very helpful comments as well.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. Dinero.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Arctic Village public opinion survey questionnaire 2009

The following is a series of 20 questions for a research study concerning Arctic Village/Vashr’aii K’oo. It will take roughly ½—45 min h to answer all the questions. You will be paid $15 for your time. The way that the survey works is that if you don’t know an answer, please feel free to tell me. If you don’t wish to answer a certain question, please tell me that also. The information from this survey will be used solely to assist my research concerning your village. Your name will not be used in any way in this research and your answers will remain confidential.

Appendix 2

 

Variables

χ2

p ≤ .05

N

Subsistence Rate × Age 21–39, 40–59, 60–80

22.156

.014

35

Subsistence Rate × Age × Sex

25.179

.005

15 (F)

Subsistence Rate × Age × Employment

17.907

.057

19 (Employed)

Subsistence Rate × Age 21–39, 40–59, 60–80 (2006)

30.054

.018

39

Caribou × Moose

12.828

.00

35

Caribou × Ducks

5.638

.03

35

Caribou × Fish

9.573

.01

35

Caribou × Berries

4.323

.05

35

Caribou × Wood

13.047

.00

35

Caribou × Shared Ducks

6.358

.03

35

Caribou × Snowgo

7.204

.01

35

Caribou × ATV

4.846

.02

35

Snowgo × ATV

5.250

.02

35

Snowgo × Wood

6.774

.02

35

Moose × Ducks

5.106

.03

35

Moose × Trapping

5.402

.03

35

Moose × Wood

4.782

.05

35

Ducks × Fish

10.272

.00

35

Ducks × Wood

8.656

.01

35

Fish × Wood

18.065

.01

35

Fish × Shared Ducks

18.154

.00

35

Education × Warmer Summers × Sex

8.819

.01

18 (M)

Education × Warmer Summers × Sex

6.199

.05

15 (F)

Education × Less Snow × Sex

7.261

.03

18 (M)

Fish × Cooler Summers

5.833

.03

35

Wood × Cooler Summers

6.964

.03

35

Warm Winters × How we Hunt

5.625

.02

30

Warm Winters × How we Hunt × Age

4.180

.05

22 (40–80 years)

Subsistence Rate × Colder Winters × Age

4.941

.03

24 (40–80 years)

Snowgo × More snow

6.103

.02

34

Snowgo × How we Hunt

5.903

.02

31

Snowgo × More snow × Ducks

4.774

.04

22 (hunters)

Snowgo × More snow × Berries

5.042

.03

24 (pickers)

Snowgo × More snow × Fish

4.288

.05

27 (fishers)

Snowgo × More snow × Trapping

4.299

.04

27 (not trappers)

Snowgo × More snow × Moose

4.735

.04

17 (not hunters)

Food quantity × Moose

4.344

.05

30

Snowgo × Food quantity

4.800

.04

30

Snowgo × Food quantity × Age

6.044

.02

22 (40–80 years)

Fridge × Food quantity

5.880

.03

30

Wet summers × Food quantity

5.625

.02

30

Wet summers × Food quantity × Age

8.526

.01

22 (40–80 years)

Food quality × Moose × Age

1.102

.05

24 (40–80 years)

Food quality × Warm winters

6.026

.02

32

Food quality × Warm winters × Age

5.760

.04

9 (21–39 years)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dinero, S.C. Indigenous perspectives of climate change and its effects upon subsistence activities in the Arctic: the case of the Nets’aii Gwich’in. GeoJournal 78, 117–137 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9424-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9424-8

Keywords

Navigation