Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confronting the data-divide in a time of spatial turns and volunteered geographic information

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geography is enjoying a period of unparalleled visibility, driven by the growing use of geographic methods and concepts across the sciences and humanities—the so-called spatial turn—and the pervasive use of geospatial Web technologies and their concomitant influence on society, especially the phenomenon of volunteered geographic information (VGI). The field of public health is beginning to harness spatiality with gusto; however, the geospatial Web and its social phenomena are underexplored in this context even though they may be particularly useful for public health enquiry, especially in low-resource settings that lack traditional data collection mechanisms. A case study framed within these two current phenomena is presented to illustrate the influence of geography and its potential for addressing the data-divide—the disparity in availability of data for scientific enquiry and decision-making most felt in low-and middle income countries. A facilitated VGI data collection initiative collected public health-related injury data in Cape Town, South Africa, as a pragmatic alternative given the lack of data from traditional sources. Emergency medical services personnel interacted with a GeoWeb interface to volunteer their informed opinions of high-incident injury locations. Previously unrecorded injury location data were created, and combined with traditional injury data for use in an ongoing study examining the environmental determinants of injury in this setting, which speaks to the possibility for hybrid authoritative/asserted data collection strategies. This study speaks to the growing influence of geography and one of its driving forces, the techno-social revolution in geospatial technology and data. Future work should continue to examine their potential to address the data-divide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AbouZahr, C., & Boerma, T. (2005). Health information systems: The foundations of public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83(8), 578–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, S. (2010). Rethinking space: An outsider’s view of the spatial turn. GeoJournal, 75(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. P., & Ruggles, A. J. (2005). Geographic information technologies and personal privacy. Cartographica, 40(4), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, H. (2005). Countries need better information to receive development aid. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83(8), 565–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambas Nolen, L., Braveman, P., Dachs, J. N. W., Delgado, I., Gakidou, E., Moser, K., et al. (2005). Strengthening health information systems to address health equity challenges. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83(8), 597–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, D. K., & Hu, W. (2005). The Population health approach: Health GIS as a bridge from theory to practice. International Journal of Health Geographics, 4(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. J. (2009). Quantitative revolution. In R. M. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 33–38). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., Hudson-Smith, A., Milton, R., & Crooks, A. (2010). Map mashups, Web 2.0 and the GIS revolution. Annals of GIS, 16(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S., Kendall, E., Muenchberger, H., Gudes, O., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2010). Geographical information systems: An effective planning and decision-making platform for community health coalitions in Australia. Health Information Management Journal, 39(3), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benigeri, M. (2007). Geographic information systems (GIS) in the health field—An opportunity to bridge the gap between researchers and administrators. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 98(Suppl 1), S74–S76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, S. (2007). Theology in its spatial turn: Space, place and built environments challenging and changing the images of God. Religion Compass, 1(3), 353–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., et al. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, M. N. K. (2004). Towards evidence-based, GIS-driven national spatial health information infrastructure and surveillance services in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, M. N. K., Resch, B., Crowley, D., Breslin, J., Sohn, G., Burtner, R., et al. (2011). Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: trends, OGC standards and application examples. International Journal of Health Geographics, 10(1), 67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, M. N. K., Sanfilippo, A. P., Corley, C. D., & Wheeler, S. (2010). Social Web mining and exploitation for serious applications: Technosocial predictive analytics and related technologies for public health, environmental and national security surveillance. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 100(1), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, M. N. K., Scotch, M., Cheung, K.-H., & Burden, D. (2008). Web GIS in practice VI: A demo playlist of geo-mashups for public health neogeographers. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(1), 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, M. N. K., & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24(1), 2–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S., Donovan, P., & Rumble, C. (2005). Developing nations, the digital divide and research databases. Serials Review, 31(4), 270–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budhathoki, N., Bruce, B., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2008). Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. GeoJournal, 72(3), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (2006a). Mashups mix data into global service. Nature, 439(7072), 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (2006b). Virtual globes: The web-wide world. Nature, 439(7078), 776–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M., Andrews, G. J., & Hodnett, E. (2006). Writing place: A comparison of nursing research and health geography. Nursing Inquiry, 13(3), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Sui, D. Z. (2010). Influenza surveillance using volunteered geographic information (VGI): A GIS-based Hidden Markov modeling approach. Zurich: GIScience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, N. (2005). Full circle: More than just social implications of GIS. Cartographica, 40(4), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinnamon, J., & Schuurman, N. (2010). Injury surveillance in low-resource settings using geospatial and social web technologies. International Journal of Health Geographics, 9(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinnamon, J., Schuurman, N., & Hameed, S. M. (2011). Pedestrian injury and human behaviour: Observing road-rule violations at high-incident intersections. PLoS ONE, 6(6), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of produsers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 4(1), 332–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors, J. P., Lei, S., & Kelly, M. (2012). Citizen science in the age of neogeography: Utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. doi: 0.1080/00045608.2011.627058

  • Corbett, J. M., & Keller, C. P. (2005). An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS). Cartographica, 40(4), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. W. (2009). Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography, 33(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromley, E. K., & McLafferty, S. L. (2002). GIS and public health. New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, M. R. (1997). The digital individual and the private realm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87(4), 681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Longueville, B., Annoni, A., Schade, S., Ostlaender, N., & Whitmore, C. (2010). Digital earth’s nervous system for crisis events: Real-time sensor Web enablement of volunteered geographic information. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrow, M. J., Goel, V., & Upshur, R. E. G. (2004). Evidence-based health policy: Context and utilisation. Social Science and Medicine, 58(1), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, J. E., & Fisher, P. F. (2003). Geoslavery. IEEE Technology and society, 22(1), 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummer, T. J. P. (2008). Health geography: Supporting public health policy and planning. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 178(9), 1177–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. R., Schaub, P., & Ross, N. A. (2007). Unpacking income inequality and population health—The peculiar absence of geography. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 98, S10–S17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. S. (2007). Using geographic information systems in injury research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(4), 306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2006). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. Professional Geographer, 58(2), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72(3), 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012). Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3), 571–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. (2011). ArcGIS online. www.arcgis.com/home. Accessed December 10, 2011.

  • Finnegan, D. (2008). The spatial turn: Geographical approaches in the history of science. Journal of the History of Biology, 41(2), 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2012). VGI as Big Data: A new but delicate geographic data-source. GeoInformatics, 15(3), 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72(3), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. M. (2007). Technologizing Africa: On the bumpy information highway. Computers and Composition, 24(3), 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., Grillmayer, R., Achard, F., et al. (2009). Geo-Wiki.Org: The use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sensing, 1(3), 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girres, J.-F., & Touya, G. (2010). Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14(4), 435–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godlee, F., Pakenham-Walsh, N., Ncayiyana, D., Cohen, B., & Packer, A. (2004). Can we achieve health information for all by 2015? The Lancet, 364(9430), 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007a). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007b). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2(1), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2009a). GIScience and systems. In R. M. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 526–538). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2009b). NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise. Journal of Location Based Services, 3(2), 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F., & Glennon, J. A. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google. (2011). Google maps Javascript API. http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/. Accessed May 21, 2011.

  • Google. (2012). Getting started guide: Google MapUp kit. http://support.google.com/mapmaker/bin/static.py?hl=en&page=guide.cs&guide=30028&topic=30130. Accessed June 7, 2012.

  • Gould, P., Kabel, J., Gorr, W., & Golub, A. (1991). AIDS: Predicting the next map. Interfaces, 21(3), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia, C., & Fonseca, A. (2008). New approaches to environmental monitoring: The use of ICT to explore volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72(3), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. I., Follert, M., Osterlund, K., & Paquin, J. (2010). Space, place and sexual sociality: Towards an ‘atmospheric analysis’. Gender. Work & Organization, 17(1), 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 682–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendler, J., & Golbeck, J. (2008). Metcalfe’s law, Web 2.0, and the Semantic Web. Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 6(1), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, G. (2009). The role of GIS for health utilization studies: Literature review. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 9(2), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Smith, A., Batty, M., Crooks, A., & Milton, R. (2009). Mapping for the masses: Accessing Web 2.0 through crowdsourcing. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 524–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Telecommunications Union. (2007). ICT statistics. http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/ict/index.html. Accessed May 29, 2008.

  • Joyce, K. (2009). “To me it’s just another tool to help understand the evidence”: Public health decision-makers’ perceptions of the value of geographical information systems (GIS). Health and Place, 15(3), 831–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, F. (2011). Volunteered geographic information: A bicycling enthusiast perspective. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 38(3), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, L., Frank, J., Di Ruggiero, E., Dobbins, M., Manuel, D., Gully, P. R., et al. (2005). Fostering evidence-based decision-making in Canada: Examining the need for a Canadian population and public health evidence centre and research network. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96(3), I-1–I-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinkenberg, B. (2003). The true cost of spatial data in Canada. Canadian Geographer, 47(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinkenberg, B. (2007). Geospatial technologies and the geographies of hope and fear. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2), 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, T. (2009). Social epidemiology as medical geography: Back to the future. GeoJournal, 74(2), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, R., & Farley, J. (2007). Infrastructure for the geospatial Web. In A. Scharl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), The geospatial web: How geobrowsers, social software, and the Web 2.0 are shaping the network society. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampos, V., & Cristianini, N. (2010). Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the social web. In: 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing (CIP), Elba, Italy.

  • Landis Lewis, Z., Douglas, G. P., Monaco, V., & Crowley, R. S. (2010). Touchscreen task efficiency and learnability in an electronic medical record at the point-of-care. Studies in Health Technology And Informatics, 160(Pt 1), 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaScala, E. A., Gerber, D., & Gruenewald, P. J. (2000). Demographic and environmental correlates of pedestrian injury collisions: A spatial analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(5), 651–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The Pro-Am revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our economy and society. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, M. G., & Peel, D. (2005). Tracing a spatial turn in planning practice in Scotland. Planning Practice and Research, 20(3), 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, J., Mock, C., Abantanga, F., Quansah, R., & Boateng, K. (2002). Using mortuary statistics in the development of an injury surveillance system in Ghana. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80(5), 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, P. A. (2000). The academic success of GIS in geography: Problems and prospects. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2(1), 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance? Geoforum, 43(1), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLafferty, S. L. (2003). GIS and health care. Annual Review of Public Health, 24(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. C. (2006). A beast in the field: The Google Maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica, 41(3), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan, S. (2007). Understanding Web 2.0. IT Professional, 9(4), 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide?: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nwomeh, B., Lowell, W., Kable, R., Haley, K., & Ameh, E. (2006). History and development of trauma registry: Lessons from developed to developing countries. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 1(1), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nykiforuk, C. I. J., & Flaman, L. M. (2011). Geographic information systems (GIS) for health promotion and public health: A review. Health Promotion Practice, 12(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D. (2006). Geographical information science: Critical GIS. Progress in Human Geography, 30(6), 783–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odero, W., Rotich, J., Yiannoutsos, C. T., Ouna, T., & Tierney, W. M. (2007). Innovative approaches to application of information technology in disease surveillance and prevention in Western Kenya. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 40(4), 390–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed April 17, 2012.

  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2010). Law’s spatial turn: Geography, justice and a certain fear of space. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 7(2), 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philo, C. (2009). Cultural turn. In R. M. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 442–450). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin, L., & Hayes, M. V. (2007). Place and health research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 98(Suppl 1), S6–S7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaeian, M., Dunn, G., St Leger, S., & Appleby, L. (2007). Geographical epidemiology, spatial analysis and geographical information systems: A multidisciplinary glossary. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(2), 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoten, D., & Parker, A. (2004). Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science, 306(5704), 2046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinner, C., Kessler, C., & Andrulis, S. (2008). The use of Web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(5), 386–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, N. (2000). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography, 24(4), 569–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, N., Hameed, S. M., Fiedler, R., Bell, N., & Simons, R. K. (2008). The spatial epidemiology of trauma: The potential of geographic information science to organize data and reveal patterns of injury and services. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 51(5), 389–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, N., Cinnamon, J., Matzopoulos, R., Fawcett, V., Nicol, A., & Hameed, S. M. (2011). Collecting injury surveillance data in low- and middle-income countries: The cape town trauma registry pilot. Global Public Health, 6(8), 874–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, C. (2008). The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process. GeoJournal, 72(3), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, R. (2001). A PPGIScience? Cartographica, 38(3/4), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Koehlmoos, T. P. (2011). Provision of health information for all. BMJ, 342(d4151), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2009). Taking space personally. In B. Warf & S. Arias (Eds.), The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanidis, A., Crooks, A., & Radzikowski, J. (in press). Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-011-9438-2.

  • Stensgaard, A. S., Saarnak, C. F. L., Utzinger, J., Vounatsou, P., Simoonga, C., Mushinge, G., et al. (2009). Virtual globes and geospatial health: the potential of new tools in the management and control of vector-borne diseases. Geospatial Health, 3(2), 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. Z. (2007). Geographic information systems and medical geography: Toward a new synergy. Geography Compass, 1(3), 556–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. Z. (2011). Introduction: Strategic directions for the geographical sciences in the next decade. Professional Geographer, 63(3), 305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. W., Prokopy, L. S., Floress, K., & Weinkauf, D. C. (2011). A method for incorporating community priorities into GIS: Challenges, choices, and directions for landscape planners. Landscape Journal, 30(2), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2002). The future of geography. Geoforum, 33(3), 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch, D. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72(3), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to Neogeography. Available at: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596529956/cover.html. O’Reilly.

  • United Nations. (2011). The millennium development goals report 2011. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warden, C., Sahni, R., & Newgard, C. (2010). Geographic cluster analysis of injury severity and hospital resource use in a regional trauma system. Prehospital Emergency Care, 14(2), 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). Introduction: The reinsertion of space into the social sciences and humanities. In B. Warf & S. Arias (Eds.), The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, Y. F. (2010). Birding 2.0: Citizen science and effective monitoring in the Web 2.0 world. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 5(2), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2007). Everybody’s business: Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes WHO’s framework for action. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2008). World Health Organization—Integrated disease surveillance and response. http://www.who.int/countries/eth/areas/surveillance/en/index.html. Accessed June 24, 2008.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Standard Research Grant. Additional research support for Cinnamon was provided by a SSHRC Canada Graduate Scholarship doctoral award. Schuurman is also supported by a career award from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR). We are grateful to Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town for collaboration opportunities and assistance on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

    Jonathan Cinnamon & Nadine Schuurman

Authors
  1. Jonathan Cinnamon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nadine Schuurman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Cinnamon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cinnamon, J., Schuurman, N. Confronting the data-divide in a time of spatial turns and volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 78, 657–674 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-012-9458-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-012-9458-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation