nach oben

Group Decision and Negotiation

Erschienen in:

01.07.2015

Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area

verfasst von: Alessandro Luè, Alberto Colorni

Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution.

Vorheriger Artikel A Transferable ThinkLet Based Process Design for Integrity Risk Assessment in Government Organizations

Nächster Artikel A Group Decision-Making Methodology with Incomplete Individual Beliefs Applied to e-Democracy

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Bana e Costa CA (2001) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: case study. J Multi-criteria Deci Anal 10:111–125CrossRef

Baucells M, Sarin RK (2003) Group decisions with multiple criteria. Manag Sci 49(8):1105–1118CrossRef

Beinat E, van Drunen M, Janssen R, Vickerman R, Norman C, Bana e Costa C, Nunes da Silva F, Joaquina Ramos IA, Gomes Veiga RJ, Laniado E, Colorni A, Muratori S, Foresti E, Tagliavini P, Stagni G (1998) A methodology for policy analysis and spatial conflicts in transport policies. Institute for Environmental Studies, R98/08, Amsterdam

Belton V (1986) A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multiattribute value function. Eur J Oper Res 26:7–21CrossRef

Belton V, Pictet J (1997) A framework for group decision using a MCDA model. Sharing, aggregating or comparing individual information? J Decis Syst 6:283–303CrossRef

Belton V (1999) Multi-criteria problem structuring and analysis in a value theory framework. In: Gal T, Stewart TJ, Hanne T (eds) Multicriteria decision making: advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory, and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

Bose U, Davey AM, Olson DL (1997) Multi-attribute utility methods in group decision making: past applications and potential for inclusion in GDSS. Omega Int J Manag Sci 25(6):691–706CrossRef

Bueno de Mesquita B (1994) Political forecasting: an expected utility method. In: Bueno de Mesquita B, Stokman FN (eds) European community decision making: models, applications and comparisons. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 71–104

Button KJ, Verhoef ET (1998) Road pricing, traffic congestion and the environment: issues of efficiency and social feasibility. Edward Elgar Pub, Northampton

Cerioli R, Colorni A, Luè A, Montanini M, Negri S, Soncini Sessa R (2006) The environmental impact assessment as a decision-making process: a case study of a transportation system in a tourist area on the Italian Alps. In: Proceedings of the 85th TRB annual meeting. Washington, DC

Colorni A, Laniado E, Muratori S (1999a) AMACI: an experimental software application for multicriteria analysis, with sensitivity and conflict analysis. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference of the decision sciences institute, Athens

Colorni A, Laniado E, Muratori S (1999b) Decision support systems for environmental impact assessment of transport infrastructures. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 4(1):1–11CrossRef

Colorni A, Righini G (2001a) Modeling and optimizing dynamic dial-a-ride problems. Int Trans Ope Res 8:155–166CrossRef

Colorni A, Laniado E, Muratori S (2001b) The distance between vectors in sensitivity and conflict analysis for multicriteria decision making. In: Colorni A, Paruccini M, Roy B (eds) AMCDA—Aide Multicritère à la Décision (Multiple criteria decision aiding). Joint Research Centre, EUR Report, The European Commission

Colorni A, Laniado E, Muratori S (2002) Procedimenti operativi e strumenti informatici per il confronto tra alternative. In: Borgia E (Ed.) Studi d’impatto ambientale nel settore dei trasporti. Progetto Finalizzato Trasporti 2, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio (in Italian)

Cook WD, Kress M, Seiford L (1996) A general framework for distance-based consensus in ordinal ranking models. Eur J Oper Res 96:392–397CrossRef

Damart S, Dias LC, Mousseau V (2007) Supporting groups in sorting decisions: methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS. Decis Support Syst 43:1464–1475CrossRef

Hobbs BF, Meier P (2000) Energy decisions and the environment: a guide to the use of multicriteria methods. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRef

Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1997) Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 98(1):19–36CrossRef

Huizingh EKRE, Vrolijk HCJ (1997) A comparison of verbal and numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Organ Beh Hum Decis Process 70(3):237–247CrossRef

Hwang CL, Lin MJ (1987) Group decision making under multiple criteria. In: Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, 281. Springer, Berlin

Jabeur K, Martel JM, Khélifa SM (2004) A distance-based collective preorder integrating the relative importance of the group’s members. Group Decis Negot 13:327–349CrossRef

Keeney RL (1976a) A group preference axiomatization with cardinal utility. Manag Sci 23(2):140–145CrossRef

Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976b) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Wiley, New York

Kersten GE (1997) Support for group decisions and negotiations. An overview. In: Climaco J (ed) Multicriteria analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 332–346CrossRef

Laniado E, Luè A, Muratori S (2010) Participation in multicriteria decisions: a software tool and a case study. In: Swayne DA, Yang W, Voinov A, Rizzoli A, Filatova T (eds) Fifth International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. Ottawa, Canada

Lardennois R (1993) VAL automated guided transit—characteristics and evolutions. J Adv Transp 27(1):103–120CrossRef

Leyva-López JC, Fernández-González E (2003) A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. Eur J Oper Res 148(1):14–27CrossRef

Matsatsinis NF, Samaras AP (2001) MCDA and preference disaggregation in group decision support systems. Eur J Oper Res 130:414–429CrossRef

Ngwenyama OK, Bryson N, Mobolurin A (1996) Supporting facilitation in group support systems: techniques for analyzing consensus relevant data. Decis Support Syst 16:155–168CrossRef

Norese MF, Toso F (2004) Group decision and distributed technical support. Int Trans Oper Res 11(4):395–417CrossRef

Ramanathan R, Ganesh LS (1994) Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. Eur J Oper Res 79(2):249–265CrossRef

Ray TG, Triantaphyllou E (1998) Evaluation of rankings with regard to possible number of agreements and conflicts. Eur J Oper Res 106:129–136CrossRef

Saaty TL, Alexander JM (1989) Conflict resolution: the analytic hierarchy approach. Praeger, New York

Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP (1997) On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 6:309–319CrossRef

Saarikoski H (2000) Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:681–700CrossRef

Schouten MJ, Timmermans JS, Beroggi GEG, Douvenc WJAM (2001) Multi-actor information system for integrated coastal zone management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21:271–289CrossRef

Shepherd A, Bowler C (1997) Beyond the requirements: improving public participation in EIA. J Environ Plann Manag 40(6):725–738CrossRef

Soncini Sessa R, Canuti D, Colorni A, Laniado E, Losa FB, Rizzoli A, Villa L, Vitali B, Weber E (2000) Use of multi-criteria analysis to resolve conflicts in the operation of a transnational multipurpose water system: the case of Lake Verbano (Italy-Switzerland). Water Int 25(3):334–346CrossRef

Stillwell WG, von Winterfeldt D, John RJ (1987) Comparing hierarchical and nonhierarchical weighting methods for eliciting multiattribute value models. Manag Sci 33(4):442–450CrossRef

Van den Honert RC, Lootsma FA (2000) Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system. Eur J Oper Res 120:162–173CrossRef

Van den Honert RC (2001) Decisional power in group decision making: a note on the allocation of group members’ weights in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Group Decis Negot 10:275–286CrossRef

Vittadini MR (1994) Piano di bacino di traffico della Valle d’Aosta. Regione Valle d’Aosta, Assessorato dell’Ambiente, Territorio e Trasporti (in Italian)

Titel: Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area
verfasst von: Alessandro Luè
Alberto Colorni
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0926-2644
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9907
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Negotiating About Charges and Pleas: Balancing Interests and Justice

Introduction

Can Chat Group Therapy Suggest a Paradigm for Axiomatized Collective Decision Process

A Transferable ThinkLet Based Process Design for Integrity Risk Assessment in Government Organizations

Is Trust Always Better than Distrust? The Potential Value of Distrust in Newer Virtual Teams Engaged in Short-Term Decision-Making

An Experimental Inquiry into the Nature of Relational Goods, and Their Impact on Co-operation