Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Student–faculty Interactions: Dynamics and Determinants

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper documents the results of a qualitative study of student–faculty interactions. The work explores the frequency and nature of interactions, sheds light on the determinants of interactions, and reveals the dynamic processes that underlie contact between faculty and students. Focus group results indicate that students have minimal contact with faculty outside the classroom, and do not appear to be aware of the importance of interacting with faculty. Results also illustrate key factors that deter and facilitate student–faculty interactions. The findings and their implications should be beneficial to faculty, student life professionals, and administrators alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • G. Anaya D. Cole (2001) ArticleTitle‘Latina/o student achievement: Exploring the influence of student–faculty interactions on college grades’ Journal of College Student Development 42 IssueID1 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2002). ‘The new professoriate: Characteristics, contributions, and compensation’, American Council on Education.

  • L. Anderson J. Carta-Falsa (2002) ArticleTitle‘Factors that make faculty and student relationships effective’ College Teaching 50 IssueID4 134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameAnonymous (2003) ArticleTitle‘Evidence of student consumerism’ The Teaching Professor 18 IssueID2 4

    Google Scholar 

  • A.W. Astin (1984) ArticleTitle‘Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education’ Journal of College Student Personnel 24 IssueID5 207–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron’s Profiles of American Colleges (2001). Hauppage, NY: Barron’s Educational Series.

  • M. Baxter Magolda (1987) ArticleTitle‘The affective dimension of learning: Faculty-student relationships that enhance intellectual development’ College Student Journal 21 46–58

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Clark M. Walker S. Keith (2002) ArticleTitle‘Experimentally assessing the student impacts of out-of-class communication: Office visits and the student experience’ Journal of College Student Development 43 IssueID6 824–837

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Delucchi K. Korgen (2002) ArticleTitle“‘We’re the customer – we pay the tuition”: Student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors’ Teaching Sociology 30 100–107

    Google Scholar 

  • N.K. Denzin Y.S. Lincoln (Eds) (2001) Handbook of Qualitative Research Sage Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Endo R. Harpel (1982) ArticleTitle‘The effect of student–faculty interaction on students’ educational outcomes’ Research in Higher Education 16 IssueID2 115–136 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00973505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Frankel S.R. Swanson (2002) ArticleTitle‘The impact of faculty-student interactions on teaching behavior: An investigation of perceived student encounter orientation, interactive confidence, and interactive practice’ Journal of Education for Business 78 IssueID2 85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fusani (1994) ArticleTitle“‘Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student–faculty interaction outside the classroom’ Journal of Applied Communication Research 22 232–255

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Geertz (1983) Local Knowledge Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L.S. Hagedorn W. Maxwell P. Rodriguez D. Hocevar J. Fillpot (2000) ArticleTitle‘Peer and student–faculty relations in community colleges’ Community College Journal of Research and Practice 24 587–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, B. and Wilson, B. (2004). ‘Appropriations, tuition, and the business cycle: Does asymmetry in the cyclical component of appropriations to higher education explain rising tuition?’ Manuscript.

  • M. Jaasma R. Koper (1999) ArticleTitle‘The relationship of student–faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation’ Communication Education 24 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Kuh (1995) ArticleTitle‘The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development’ Journal of Higher Education 66 IssueID2 123–155

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Kuh S. Hu (2001) ArticleTitle‘The effects of student–faculty interaction in the 1990s’ Review of Higher Education 24 IssueID3 309–332

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Morgan (1998) The Focus Group Guidebook Sage Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Nadler L. Nadler (2001) ArticleTitle‘The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out-of-class communication between faculty and students’ Women’s Studies in Communication 24 IssueID2 241–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Institutional Research (OIR). (2004). Retrieved July 10, 2004, from http://www.umbc.edu/oir/.

  • G. Parsell (2000) ArticleTitle‘Students as customers’ Medical Education 34 328–329

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Pascarella P. Terenzini (1980) ArticleTitle‘Student–faculty and student–peer relationships as mediators of the structural effects of undergraduate residence arrangement’ Journal of Educational Research 73 IssueID6 344–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. and Terenzini, P. (1981). ‘Residence arrangement, student/faculty relationships, and freshman-year educational outcomes’. Journal of College Student Personnel 147–156.

  • E. Pascarella P. Terenzini (1998) ArticleTitle‘Studying college students in the 21st century: Meeting new challenges’ Review of Higher Education 21 IssueID2 151–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Plecha, M. (2002). ‘The impact of motivation, student–peer, and student–faculty interaction on academic self-confidence’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 1–5, 2002.

  • G. Rosenthal E. Folse N. Alleman D. Boudreaux B. Soper C. Bergen ParticleVon (2000) ArticleTitle‘The one-to-one survey: Traditional versus non-traditional student satisfaction with professors during one-to-one contacts’ College Student Journal 34 IssueID2 315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2000). ‘Data management and analysis methods’, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research(2nd edn.), pp. 769–802.

  • Sax, L., Lindholm, J., Astin, A., Korn, W. and Mahoney, K. (2001). ‘The American freshman: National norms for fall 2002’, The Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.

  • C.E. Share (1997) ArticleTitle‘Implications of considering students as consumers’ College Teaching 45 IssueID4 122–123

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Snow (1973) ArticleTitle‘Correlates of faculty-student interaction’ Sociology of Education 46 IssueID4 489–498

    Google Scholar 

  • L.C. Strauss J.F. Volkwein (2004) ArticleTitle‘Predictors of student commitment at two-year and four-year institutions’ The Journal of Higher Education 75 IssueID2 203–227 Occurrence Handle10.1353/jhe.2004.0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Tam (2002) ArticleTitle‘University impact on student growth: A quality measure?’ Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 24 IssueID2 211–218 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1360080022000013527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Terenzini L. Springer E. Pascarella A. Nora (1995) ArticleTitle‘Academic and out-of-class influences on students’ intellectual orientations’ Review of Higher Education 19 IssueID2 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Terenzini C. Theophilides W. Lorang (1984) ArticleTitle‘Influences on students’ perceptions of their academic skill development during college’ Journal of Higher Education 55 IssueID5 621–636

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Terenzini T. Wright (1987) ArticleTitle‘Influences on students’ academic growth during four years of college’ Research in Higher Education 26 IssueID2 161–179 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00992027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Thompson (2001) ArticleTitle‘Informal student–faculty interaction: Its relationship to educational gains in science and mathematics among community college students’ Community College Review 29 IssueID1 35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (2nd edn.).Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • L. Tsui (2000) ArticleTitle‘Effects of campus culture on students’ critical thinking’ Review of Higher Education 23 IssueID4 421–441

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Volkwein M. King P. Terenzini (1986) ArticleTitle‘Student–faculty relationships and intellectual growth among transfer students’ Journal of Higher Education 57 IssueID4 413–430

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Walsh (1999) ArticleTitle‘The academic calling, creating spaces for spirit’ Change 31 IssueID4 18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Wilson L. Woods J. Gaff (1974) ArticleTitle‘Social-psychological accessibility and faculty-student interaction beyond the classroom’ Sociology of Education 47 IssueID1 74–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County,1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA

    Shelia R. Cotten

  2. Department of Economics, Saint Louis University, 3674 Lindell Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA

    Bonnie Wilson

Authors
  1. Shelia R. Cotten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bonnie Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonnie Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cotten, S.R., Wilson, B. Student–faculty Interactions: Dynamics and Determinants. High Educ 51, 487–519 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-1705-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-1705-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation