Skip to main content
Log in

University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward (Online) Peer Assessment

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of peer assessment (PA) as an alternative form of evaluation method is reported to be helpful in learning and is increasingly being adopted in higher education settings. Through collecting data from 280 university students in Taiwan, a 20-item instrument was developed to investigate university students’ attitudes toward and perceptions of PA and online PA. Four subscales, Positive Attitudes, Online Attitudes, Understanding-and-Action, and Negative Attitudes, were extracted and reliabilities were calculated. Results revealed that participating students held positive attitudes toward the use of PA activities, but they viewed online PA as a technical tool to facilitate assessment processes, rather than as a learning aid. Male students had more positive attitudes toward PA than females did, and students with previous PA experiences had less negative attitudes toward PA. A majority of these students suggested that the PA score should be counted as a small part of the total course grade, and there was an effect of the perceived importance of PA score on students’ attitudes toward these four subscales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. Arnold L. Willoughby V. Calkins L. Gammon G. Eberhart (1981) ArticleTitle‘Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students’ Journal of Medical Education 56 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ballantyne K. Hughes A. Mylonas (2002) ArticleTitle‘Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 427–441 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0260293022000009302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Boud (1990) ArticleTitle‘Assessment and the promotion of academic values’ Studies in Higher Education 15 110–113 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075079012331377621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Brindley S. Scoffield (1998) ArticleTitle‘Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes’ Teaching in Higher Education 3 79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Butler S.R. Hodge (2001) ArticleTitle‘Enhancing student trust through peer assessment in physical education’ Physical Educator 58 30–41

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Cheng M. Warren (1997) ArticleTitle‘Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise’ Studies in Higher Education 22 233–239 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075079712331381064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Clegg D. Trayhurn A. Johnson (2000) ArticleTitle‘Not just for men: A case study of the teaching and learning of information technology in higher education’ Higher Education 40 123–145 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004093116051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V.A. Clifford (1999) ArticleTitle‘The development of autonomous learners in a university setting’ Higher Education Research & Development 18 115–128

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Davies (2000) ArticleTitle‘Computerized peer assessment’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International 37 346–355 Occurrence Handle10.1080/135580000750052955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Falchikov (1995) ArticleTitle‘Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International 32 175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Falchikov (2001) Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education Routledge Falmer London

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Falchikov J. Goldfinch (2000) ArticleTitle‘Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks’ Review of Educational Research 70 287–322

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Falchikov D. Magin (1997) ArticleTitle‘Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students’ group process work’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 22 385–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, C. (1999). ‘Students as evaluators in practicum: Examining peer/self assessment and self-efficacy’, Presented at the National Conference of the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision, New Orleans

  • L. Hatcher E.J. Stepanski (1994) A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics SAS Institute Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Hanrahan G. Issacs (2001) ArticleTitle‘Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views’ Higher Education Research & Development 20 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • C.B. Johnson F.I. Smith (1997) ArticleTitle‘Assessment of a complex peer evaluation instrument for team learning and group processes’ Accounting Education (JAI) 2 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lejk M. Wyvill (2001) ArticleTitle‘The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 551–561

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J. LeMare K.H. Rubin (1987) ArticleTitle‘Perspective taking and peer interaction: Structural and developmental analysis’ Child Development 58 306–315

    Google Scholar 

  • S.S.J. Lin E.Z.F. Liu S.M. Yuan (2001) ArticleTitle‘Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles’ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 420–432 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. McConnell (2002) ArticleTitle‘The experience of collaborative assessment in E-learning’ Studies in Continuing Education 24 73–102 Occurrence Handle10.1080/01580370220130459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. McGourty (2000) ArticleTitle‘Using multisource feedback in the classroom: A computer-based approach’ IEEE Transactions on Education 43 120–124 Occurrence Handle10.1109/13.848062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Orsmond S. Merry (1996) ArticleTitle‘The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 21 239–250

    Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Paquet J.E. Marchais ParticleDes (1998) ArticleTitle‘Students’ acceptance of peer assessment’ Education for Health 11 25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Rubin (2002) ArticleTitle‘“I just think maybe you could...” Peer critiquing through online conversations’ Teaching English in the Two-Year College 29 382–392

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Sambell L. McDowell (1998) ‘The values of self and peer assessment to the developing lifelong learner’ C. Rust (Eds) Improving Student Learning – Improving Students as Learners Oxford Center for Staff and Learning Development Oxford, UK 56–66

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Scouller (1998) ArticleTitle‘The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay’ Higher Education 35 453–472 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003196224280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Sluijsmans F. Dochy G. Moerkerke (1999) ArticleTitle‘Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment’ Learning Environment Research 1 293–319

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Smith A. Cooper L. Lancaster (2002) ArticleTitle‘Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International 39 71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • T.H. Spotts M.A. Bowman C. Mertz (1997) ArticleTitle‘Gender and use of instructional technologies: A study of university faculty’ Higher Education 34 421–436 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003035425837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Stanier (1997) ArticleTitle‘Peer assessment and group work as vehicles for student empowerment: A module evaluation’ Journal of Geography in Higher Education 21 95–98

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E Sullivan M.A. Hitchcock G.L. Dunnington (1999) ArticleTitle‘Peer and self assessment during problem-based tutorials’ The American Journal of Surgery 177 266–269 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00006-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Topping (1998) ArticleTitle‘Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities’ Review of Educational Research 68 249–276

    Google Scholar 

  • C.-C. Tsai E.Z.-F. Liu S.S.J. Lin S.-M. Yuan (2001a) ArticleTitle‘A networked peer assessment system based on a Vee heuristic’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International 38 220–230

    Google Scholar 

  • C.-C. Tsai S.S.J. Lin M.-J. Tsai (2001b) ArticleTitle‘Developing an Internet attitude scale for high school students’ Computers & Education 37 41–51 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00033-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.-C. Tsai S.S.J. Lin S.-M. Yuan (2002) ArticleTitle‘Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system’ Computers & Education 38 241–252 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00069-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Williams (1992) ArticleTitle‘Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment’ Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 17 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Zevenbergen (2001) ArticleTitle‘Peer assessment of student constructed posters: Assessment alternatives in preservice mathematics education’ Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4 95–113 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011401532410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin-Chung Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wen, M.L., Tsai, CC. University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward (Online) Peer Assessment. High Educ 51, 27–44 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8

Keywords

Navigation