Skip to main content
Log in

Defining the essence of a university: lessons from higher education branding

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Branding is a phenomenon that has become increasingly common in higher education over the last few years. It entails defining the essence of what a university “is”, what it “stands for”, and what it is going to be known for, requiring precision and consistency in the formulations as well as internal commitment to the brand. This article details what happened in the process of defining the essence of a regional university in Northern Norway. Addressing the challenges, the article reveals that the notions of consistency, precision, and commitment generated resistance from faculty members and made the process very difficult to fulfill. An important finding is that a university may be too complex to be encapsulated by one brand or identity definition. The article describes this process, explains the reasons for the difficulties, and discusses some implications for higher education branding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All quotes are translated from Norwegian by the authors.

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 263–295). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Meek, V. L., & Larsen, I. M. (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. (2008). Mapping academic resistance in the managerial university. Organization, 15(2), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antorini, Y. M., & Schultz, M. (2005). Corporate branding and the conformity trap. In M. Schultz, Y. M. Antorini, & F. F. Csaba (Eds.), Corporate branding. Purpose/people/processes (pp. 57–78). København: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenti, P. A., & Forman, J. (2002). The power of corporate communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. J., & Balmer, J. M. T. (1997). Visual identity: Trappings or substance? European Journal of Marketing, 31(5), 366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M. T. (2001). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing. Seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 248–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balwin, G., & James, R. (2000). The market in Australian hiher education and the concept of student as informed consumer. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, C., Mount, J., & Wilson, M. (2002). Institutional image and retantion. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(3), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulotaite, N. (2003). University heritage—an institutional tool for branding and marketing. Higher Education in Europe, 28(4), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C. (2004). Interpretation and implementation of reputation/brand management by UK university leaders. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 5(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C. (2005). Do universities have ‘successful’ brands? International Journal of Educational Advancement, 6(1), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. T., Torp, S., & Firat, A. F. (2005). Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: An odd couple? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(2), 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial university organizations: Pathways of transfomation. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., Gioia, D. A., & Fabbri, T. (2000). Organizational identity in transition over time. In D. Rousseau (Ed.), Advances in organizational behavior. Wiley & Sons.

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., Kogan, M., & Amaral, A. (2005). Reform and change in higher education: Analysing policy implementation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. J., Fam, K. S., & Llanes, V. A. (2003). Branding universities in Asian markets. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(2), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39(1), 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., & Neumann, R. (2007). Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities—the establishment of a performance-driven system for Australian higher education. Public Management Review, 9(2), 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley-Brown, J., & Goonawardana, S. (2007). Brand harmonization on the international higher education market. Journal of Buusiness research, 60, 942–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. D. (2002). Narratives of organizational identity and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies, 23(3), 421–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N. (1997). The corporate brand. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N. (2004). Living the brand: How to transform every member of your organization into a brand champion. Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B. (2003). Marketisation in higher educaion, Clarke’s triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(6), 110–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, K., Aurand, T., & Gorchels, L. (2006). Building a university brand from within: A comparison of Coaches’ perspectives of internal branding. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 16(1), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, M. (2002). Relationship marketing on the Internet: The case of top- and lower-ranked universities and colleges. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9, 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, A. (2007). Branding higher education: Equivalence and difference in developing identity. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 990–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1979). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Oslo; Boston: Scandinavian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maringe, F., & Foskett, N. (2002). Marketing university education: The South African experience. Higher Education Review, 34(3), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T. (1998). Critical success factors for international education marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 12(4), 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melewar, T. C., & Akel, S. (2006). The role of corporate identity in the higher education sector: A case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 26(1), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. (1997). Recruiting overseas graduate students: Are their information requirements being satisfied? Higher Education Quarterly, 51(3), 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Macinnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reindfleisch, J. M. (2003). Segment profiling: Reducing risk in higher education management. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(2), 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörlin, S. (2007). Funding diversity: Performance-based funding regimes as drivers of differentiation in higher education systems. Higher Education Policy, 20, 413–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (2007). The relationship between branding and organisational change. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, P. (2006). Branding higher education: Illusion or reality? Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education, 10(1), 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rekom, J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2000). Operational measures of organizational identity: A review of existing methods. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(4), 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Riel, C. B. M. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riel, C. B. M., & Balmer, J. M. T. (1997). Corporate identity: The concept, its measurement and management. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5), 340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Riel, C. B. M., & Fombrun, C. (2007). Essentials of corporate communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arild Wæraas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wæraas, A., Solbakk, M.N. Defining the essence of a university: lessons from higher education branding. High Educ 57, 449–462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9155-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9155-z

Keywords

Navigation