Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The construction of university-community partnerships: entangled perspectives

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of meaningful partnerships with communities is a shared concern of many higher education institutions. However, the building of significant partnerships between universities and communities is still a complex task, which generates multiple tensions. Based on a qualitative study that examined the lived experiences of participants in an innovative university-community partnership in Israel, the article analyzes the concept of partnership from a social constructivist theoretical perspective. The study focused on four research areas: the experience of partnership; the perception of partnership; the barriers to partnership-building, and the impact of participation on participants. Findings challenge essentialist views of partnership and highlight the constructed and discursive nature of the concept. The article found several crucial factors to be acknowledged in the process of partnership management: role perspectives, group affiliation, institutional context, power relations, the organizational culture of the partnership, and the societal perceptions of social problems addressed by the partnership. It concludes with some recommendations for the management of more meaningful university-community partnerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, D. (2005). Communities, governments and AIDS: Making partnerships work. In P. Aggleton, P. Davies, & G. Hart (Eds.), Aids: Safety, sexuality and risk (pp. 109–117). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, C., & Schwartz, W. (1989). School-college alliances: Benefits for low-income minorities. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1982). Beyond the ivory tower: Social responsibilities of the modern university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge earthquake: Community-based approaches to unmet recovery needs. Disasters, 22, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darder, A. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

  • Farquhar, S. A., & Dobson, N. (2005). Community and university participation in disaster-relief policy and practices: An example from eastern North Carolina. Journal of Community Practice, 12, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., Fabricant, M., & Simmons, L. (2005). Understanding contemporary university-community connections. Journal of Community Practice, 12, 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (2002). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

  • Gray, B. (1997). Framing and reframing of intractable environmental disputes. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & R. Bies (Eds.), Research in organizations (Vol. 6, pp. 163–188). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2000). A critique of assessing collaborative efforts: Assessing inter-organizational collaboration. In D. Faulkner & M. De Rond (Eds.), Cooperative strategy (pp. 243–261). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11–34). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2004). Strong opposition: Frame-based resistance to collaboration. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 14, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronksi, R., & Pigg, K. (2000). University and community collaboration. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 781–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). What makes partnerships work? In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), Public private partnerships (pp. 293–310). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Butterfield, A. K., & Soska, T. (Eds.). (2005). University-community partnerships: Universities in civic engagement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. H., & Oliver, M. L. (1991). Urban poverty and social welfare policy in the United States: An undergraduate research/training programme. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 15, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, B., & Bayer, R. (2003). Establishing ethical trials for treatment and prevention of AIDS in developing countries. British Medical Journal, 327, 337–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maginn, P. J. (2007). Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration: The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography. Qualitative Research, 7, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurrasse, D. J. (2001). Beyond the campus: How colleges and universities form partnerships with their communities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurrasse, D. J. (2002). Higher education-community partnerships: Assessing progress in the field. Nonprofit & Volunteer Quarterly, 31, 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mays, G. P., Halverson, P. K., & Kaluzny, A. D. (1998). Collaboration to improve community health: Trends and alternative models. Journal of Quality Improvement, 24, 518–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. M., & Hafner, M. M. (2008). Moving toward dialogical collaboration: A critical examination of a university–school–community partnership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 66–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M., Vásquez, V. B., Warner, J. R., Steussey, H., & Facente, S. (2006). Sowing the seeds for sustainable change: A community-based participatory research partnership for health promotion in Indiana, USA and its aftermath. Health Promotion International, 21, 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulroy, E. (2004). University civic engagement with community-based organizations: Dispersed or coordinated models? Journal of Community Practice, 12, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., Crim, B., Silberman, P., & Brown, B. B. (2004). Community adversity and community development: Ecological and strengths-based theory, research and policies. In K. Maton, B. Ledbeater, C. Schellenberg, & A. Solarz (Eds.), Investing in children, youth, families and communities: Strengths-based research and policy (pp. 321–340). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage Publications.

  • Richardson, W. C., & Allegrante, J. P. (2000). Shaping the future of health through global partnerships. In C. E. Koop, C. E. Pearson, & M. R. Schwarz (Eds.), Critical issues in global health (pp. 375–383). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwand, T. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics and social constructivism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189–214). London: Sage Publications.

  • Silka, L. (1999). Paradoxes of partnerships: Reflections on university-community collaborations. Research in Politics & Society, 7, 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Balcazar, Y., & Kinney, L. (2006). Realities and myths of safety issues for community researchers working in a marginalized African American community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1979). What’s in a frame? Surface evidence of underlying expectations. In R. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processes (pp. 137–181). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. R., Braveman, B., & Hammel, J. (2004). Developing and evaluating community services through participatory action research: Two case examples. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in inter-organizational collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, E., & Seifert, M. (1992). Variability in the framing of risk issues. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck, J. (1985). The importance of process in resolving environmental disputes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 5, 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roni Strier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strier, R. The construction of university-community partnerships: entangled perspectives. High Educ 62, 81–97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9367-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9367-x

Keywords

Navigation