Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Bologna Process: inception, ‘take up’ and familiarity

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the value of the Bologna Process in placing the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) on a solid institutional footing. How far has Bologna contributed to firming up the views academia, management and students have of the EHEA? The article is based on a survey administered across four systems of higher education in 2008. It underlines the importance for those active in shaping policy both at national and at European level to take fully into account the views of the different interests in higher education, difficult and at times non committal though these latter might be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There are, of course, other descriptors—Academic, Administrative and Student Constituencies, for instance. And indeed, there are good reasons for the use of this alternative term.

    For a discussion of the forces that moved the Estates over to becoming Constituencies see Neave (2009) especially footnote 1 pp. 32–33).

  2. Despite the terminology used, it is in effect an interpretational artefact, which had many believing that the advent of the Bachelor degree was itself a bid to introduce the American version of a liberal arts degree into Europe, often in the face of clear evidence that the 3 year British Bachelor was nothing if not highly specialized.

  3. This issue was first aired in the Bologna Declaration, which touched upon the desirability of extending independence and autonomy to all Higher Education Institutions.

References

  • Alesi, B., Burger, S., Kehm, B., & Teichler, U. (2005). Status of the introduction of Bachelor and Master Study Programmes in the Bologna Process and in selected European countries compared with Germany. Kassel: Centre for Research on Higher Education and Work, University of Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., & Magalhães, A. (2004). Epidemiology and the Bologna Saga. Higher Education, 48, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Neave, G., Musselin, C., & Maassen, P. (Eds.). (2009). European integration and the governance of higher education and research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen Communiqué. (2005). The European Higher Education AreaAchieving the goals. Bergen.

  • Bologna Declaration. (1999). The European Higher Education Area. Bologna.

  • Cardoso, S. (2009). Representações estudantis da avaliação das instituições de ensino superior. Tese de Doutoramento, Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerych, L., & Sabatier, P. (1987). Great expectations and mixed performance. The implementation of higher education reforms in Europe, Stoke on Trent (England) Trentham Books for European Institute of Education and Social Policy.

  • Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. (2005). Universities and the Europe of knowledge: Ideas, institutions and policy entrepreneurship in European Union Higher Education, 1955–2005. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosier, D., Purser, L., & Smidt, H. (2007). Trends V: Universities shaping the European Higher Education Area. Geneva: EUA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, M. J. F., Santaolalla, R. C., & Gonzalez, A. G. (2010). Faculty attitudes and training needs to respond the new European Higher Education challenges. Higher Education, 60(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESIB. (2009). Bologna with students eyes. Leuven.

  • European Commission. (2007). From Bergen to London—The contribution of the European Commission to the Bologna Process.

  • European Commission. (2009). Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Report on progress in quality assurance in higher education.

  • European Council. (2000). Conclusions of Lisbon European Council. Lisbon: European Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. (2005). Coordinating policies for a “Europe of knowledge” Emerging practices of the “Open Method of Coordination” in education and research. ARENA. Oslo: Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.

  • Gornitzka, Å. (2006). What is the use of Bologna in national reform? In V. Tomusk (Ed.), Creating the European Area of Higher Education—Voices from the periphery (pp. 19–41). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. (2007). The Lisbon process: A supranational policy perspective—Institutionalizing the open method of coordination. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 3–22). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, T., & Knill, C. (2008). Analysing the differential impact of the Bologna Process: Theoretical considerations on national conditions for international policy convergence. Higher Education, 56(4), 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitor, M., & Horta, H. (2012). Science and Technology in Portugal: From late awakening to the challenge of Knowledge Integrated Communities. In G. Neave & A. Amaral (Eds.), Higher Education in Portugal 1974–2009: A Nation, a Generation (pp. 179–226). Dordrecht: Springer Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeliazkova, M., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2002). Systemic adaptation to a changing environment: Towards a next generation of quality assurance models. Higher Education, 44(3–4), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B., Huisman, J., & Stensaker, B. (Eds.). (2009). The European Higher Education Area: Perspectives on a moving target. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Communiqué. (2009). The Bologna Process 2020The European Higher Education Area in the new decade. Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve.

  • Maassen, P., & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.). (2007). University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1999). Changing academic work—Developing the learning university. Oxford: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscati, R. (2009). The implementation of Bologna process in Italy. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European integration and the governance of higher education and research (pp. 207–225). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2009). The side effects of the Bologna process on national institutional settings. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European integration and the governance of higher education and research (pp. 281–299). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, Guy. (2009). The academic estate revisited; reflections on academia’s rapid progress from the Capitoline Hill to the Tarpeian Rock. In J. Enders & E. de Weert (Eds.), The changing face of academic life: Analytical and comparative perspectives. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

  • Neave, G., & Amaral, A. (2008). On process, progress, success and methodology or, the unfolding of the Bologna Process as it appears to two reasonably benign observers. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1–2), 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, L. J., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation—How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, why it’s amazing that Federal Programs work at all, this being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravinet, P. (2008). From voluntary participation to monitored coordination: Why European countries feel increasingly bound by their commitment to the Bologna process. European Journal of Education, 43(3), 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reale, E., & Potí, B. (2009). Italy: Local policy legacy and moving to an “in between” configuration. In C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), University Governance: Western European comparative perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomusk, V. (2006). Creating the European Area of Higher Education—Voices from the periphery. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. R. (1998). Academics responding to change—New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Välimaa, J., & Ylijoki, O.-H. (Eds.). (2008). Cultural perspectives on higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, A. (2010). Bologna and the institutionalisation of European Higher Education Area. Doctoral Thesis, Porto, University of Porto.

  • Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2009). Survey on the implementation of the Bologna process in Portugal. Higher Education, 57(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, A., Amaral, A., & Mendes, A. (2008). Implementing Bologna in Southern European countries: Comparative analysis of some research findings. Education for Chemical Engineers, 3(1), e47–e56. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2008.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1984). Using social research in public policy making. In D. B. P. Kallen, G. B. Kosse, H. C. Wagenaar, J. J. J. Kloprogge, & M. Vorbeck (Eds.), Social science research: A reappraisal. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. (2006). Change of degrees and degrees of change: Comparing adaptations of European Higher Education Systems in the context of the Bologna Process. Doctoral Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.

  • Witte, J. (2009). Parallel universes and common themes: Reforms of curricular governance in the Bologna context. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European integration and the governance of higher education and research (pp. 227–255). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy Neave.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neave, G., Veiga, A. The Bologna Process: inception, ‘take up’ and familiarity. High Educ 66, 59–77 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9590-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9590-8

Keywords

Navigation