Skip to main content
Log in

Opportunity costs associated with the provision of student services: a case study of web-based lecture technology

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Universities aim to provide services that are not only beneficial to students but also efficient relative to possible alternative services. Using opportunity cost, this study considers staff and student perceptions of the usefulness and valuation of web-based lecture technology (WBLT). It reveals that a quarter of students did not use WBLT while many staff members thought WBLT had a negative impact on their face-to-face teaching. Further, over a third of students sampled said they would not be affected if WBLT were not made available and many staff members felt constrained by WBLT technology. Some staff members spent a lot of time preparing WBLT while others eschewed the technology altogether. Nevertheless, a relatively small number of students place enormous value on WBLT, as do some staff, even if only simple audio of lectures are provided. The academic policy implications of this study suggest that university provision of WBLT could take into account the opportunity cost of WBLT use as a valuation-basis, possibly recovering costs through extra fees. This would allow for improved decision-making by university administrators and facilitate a move towards a useful measurement basis of WBLT. A wider academic policy implication is to consider whether all universities should produce and deliver WBLT at all and to what extent it should encourage staff to develop enhanced WBLT. Provision of sophisticated WBLT or any other service for students bears an opportunity cost in terms of less preparation by staff for face-to-face lessons or other effective teaching or research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Phillips et al. (2007) and von Konsky et al (2009) argue that other factors contribute to falling attendance rates. These include the increasingly complex lifestyles of students and their changed perceptions of the learning experience provided.

  2. An anonymous reviewer pointed out this question is problematic for students in their final semester of study. This affected only two surveyed units (less than 5 % of the sample) as sampling was performed at the end of first semester and so does not materially influence our results.

References

  • Baggaley, J. (2008). Where did distance education go wrong? Distance Education, 29(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, J. A. D. (2006). Audio recordings of lectures as e-learning resource, Paper presented at the built environment education annual conference (BEECON 2006).

  • Brabazon, T. (2002). Digital Hemlock. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. (2008). Review of higher education final report. http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Review/Pages/ReviewofAustralianHigherEducationReport.aspx. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Bryant, S. M., Kahle, J. B., & Schafer, B. A. (2005). Distance education: A review of the contemporary literature. Issues in Accounting Education, 20(3), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. (2007). Academic perceptions of the use of Lectopia: A University of Melbourne example. In: ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/chang.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2012.

  • Copley, J. (2007). Audio and video podcasts of lectures for campus-based students: Production and evaluation of student use. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Education research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle Creek, N.J: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J., Kanwar, A., & Uvalić-Trumbić, S. (2008). Achieving quality in distance education, http://www.col.org/RESOURCES/SPEECHES/Pages/2008-04-04.aspx. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Day, J., & Foley, J. (2006). Evaluating Web Lectures: A Case Study from HCI. Montreal: CHI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardon, M. (2003). Internet streaming of lectures: A matter of style, http://www.caudit.edu.au/educauseaustralasia/2003/EDUCAUSE/PDF/AUTHOR/ED031019.PDF. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Gosper, M., Green, D., McNeil, M., Phillips, R., Preston, G., & Woo, K. (2008). The impact of web-based lecture technologies on current and future practices in learning and teaching, Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Australian Government Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. http://www.cpd.mq.edu.au/teaching/wblt/research/report.html. Accessed 2 June 2012.

  • Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Woo, K., Phillips, R., Preston, G., & Green, D. (2007). Web-based lecture recording technologies: Do students learn from them? Paper presented at the Educause Australasia 2007, Melbourne, http://www.caudit.edu.au/educauseaustralasia07/authors_papers/Gosper.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Henry, J., & Meadows, J. (2008). An absolutely riveting online course: Nine principles for excellence in web-based teaching, http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/179/177. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Larkin, H. (2010). “But they won’t come to lectures…’ The impact of audio recorded lectures on student experience and attendance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 238–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lectopia. (2009). About Lectopia, www.lectopia.com.au. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Massingham, P., & Herrington, T. (2006). Does attendance matter? An examination of student attitudes, participation, performance and attendance. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 3(2), 82–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, J., & Blount, Y. (2006). You, me and ilecture. Proceedings of the 23rd annual ascilite conference, http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p87.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • McKenzie, W. (2008). Where are audio recordings of lectures in the new educational technology landscape? http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/mckenzie-w.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • McKinlay, N. (2007). The vanishing student trick—The trouble with recorded lectures, http://www.utas.edu.au/arts/flexarts/vanishing.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • McNeill, M., Woo, K., Gosper, M., Phillips, R., Preston, G., & Green, D. (2007). Using web-based lecture technologies—advice from students, http://www.cpd.mq.edu.au/teaching/wblt/dissemination.htm. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Naidu, S. (2007). Instructional design for optimal learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 247–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, K., & Scutters, S. (2010). Podcasting of health science lectures: Benefits for students from a non-English speaking background. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 1028–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Woo, K., Preston, G., & Green, D. (2007). Staff and student perspectives on web based lecture technologies: Insights into the great divide, http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/phillips.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Rumble, G. (2001). Re-inventing Distance Education, 1971-2001. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(1/2), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, M. (2007). Collaborative interaction. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (2nd ed., pp. 311–322). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Grebennikov, L., & Gozzard, T. (2009). ICT-enabled Learning: The student perspective. Journal of Institutional Research, 14(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheely, S. (2006). Persistent technologies: Why can’t we stop lecturing online? In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who’s Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 769–774). Sydney: Sydney University Press.

  • Taplin, R. H., Low, L. H., & Brown, A. M. (2011). Students’ Satisfaction and Valuation of Web-Based Lecture Recording Technologies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J. V., & Kyoko, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trindade, A. R., Carmo, H., & Bidarra, J. (2000). Current developments and best practice in open and distance learning, http://irrodl.org/v2001.2001.html. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • von Konsky, B. R., Ivins, J., & Gribble, S. J. (2009). Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: A comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 581–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenberg, F., & Stacey, E. (2005). Reflections on teaching and learning online: Quality program design, delivery and support issues from a cross-global perspective. Distance Education, 26(3), 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Fardon, M. (2007). Perpetual connectivity: Lecture recordings and portable media players, http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/williams-jo.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2012.

  • Woo, K., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Preston, G., Green, D., & Phillips, R. (2008). Web-based lecture technologies: blurring the boundaries between face-to-face and distance learning. ALT-J, 16(2), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the students and staff for their time participating in this research and thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to improve this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross H. Taplin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taplin, R.H., Kerr, R. & Brown, A.M. Opportunity costs associated with the provision of student services: a case study of web-based lecture technology. High Educ 68, 15–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9677-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9677-x

Keywords

Navigation