Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalising higher education environment: pedagogical, quality and equity issues

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marketisation, increased student mobility, the massification of Higher Education (HE) and stagnating staff numbers in universities have combined to cause a ripple effect of change both in the demography and size of university classes across the world. This has implications for the quality and equity of learning and the need to examine and to transform pedagogical practices. Despite the growing attention of literature on teaching large classes, there is a scarcity of research addressing the twin issues of large classes in an increasingly internationalised context. This paper seeks to contribute towards filling this gap. The paper provides a theoretical exploration of the causes of such classes in HE, reviews the empirical evidence against large class teaching and examines the difficulties associated with teaching demographically diverse classes in HE. The paper identifies eight pedagogical strategies to address the issues of class size and diversity, which relate to increasing student participation and engagement; increasing curricula access and the language of instruction; increasing staff intercultural understanding; increasing opportunities for deep learning for all; on-going monitoring of student satisfaction; increasing opportunities to achieve; diversification of assessment; and the merit of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS). It calls for new research on global learning cultures; reviews of global assessment and promising pedagogical practices and processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (2009). Peripheries and centers: Research universities in developing countries. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college?. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W., & Lasley, T. (2002). Poverty not race, holds back urban students. School information-public school reports-school ratings-school rankings-national, 28.

  • Bambas, A., Casas, J. A., Drayton, H. A., & Valdez, A. (2000). Health and human development in the new global economy. Washington, DC: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. A. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19, 3–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista, J. P. (2012). General agreement on trade in services. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of globalization, 1st edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

  • Bean, J. C. (2001). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, J. (2002). The first year of doctoring: Still a survival exercise. Medical Education, 36, 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2001). Assessment: A guide for lecturers. New York: Generic Centre: Learning and Teaching Support Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Carasso, H. (2013). Everything for sale? The marketisation of UK higher education. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Race, P., & Smith, B. (1996). 500 tips on assessment. Milton Park: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderon, A., & Mathies, C. (2013). Institutional research in the future: Challenges within higher education and the need for excellence in professional practice. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(157), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, E. (1999). Students behaving badly in large classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 77, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, E., & Greenberg, J. (1998). Teaching large classes: Unpacking the problem and responding creatively. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), To improve the Academy (Vol. 17). Stillwater: New Forums Press and the Professional and Developmental Network in Higher Education.

  • CHE. (2010a). Access and throughput in South African Higher Education: Three case studies. In (Vol. 9.). Pretoria: Council on Higher Education. http://www.che.ac.za.

  • CHE. (2010b). Teaching and learning beyond formal access. Assessment through the looking glass. Reading below the surface (Vol. 10). Pretoria: Council on Higher Education. http://www.che.ac.za.

  • Christopher, D. A. (2011). Interactive large classes: The dynamics of teacher/student interaction. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 1(8), 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. L., & Robinson, P. (2000). The argument for making large classes seem small. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuseo, J. (2004). The empirical case against large class size: adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. The Journal of Faculty Development, 21(1), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin, B., & Watkins, D. (2000). The role of repetition in the processes of memorising and understanding: A comparison of the views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallat, J. (2009). Learning and Teaching. Online staff resource document. Department of Learning and Teaching: Dundalk Institute of Technology.

  • Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3, 1–28. http://www.tonybates.ca/wp-content/uploads/Making-Sense-of-MOOCs.pdf.

  • Daniel, J., & Uvalić-Trumbić, S. (2013). Daffodil University. Paper presented at the international conference on tertiary education: Realities and challenges.

  • DHET. (2012). The department of higher education and training. Call for comments on the green paper for post-school education and training. 34935(3), 98. [Online] http://www.info.gov.za/view/DynamicAction?pageid=623&myID=324216. Accessed 24 October 2013.

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. A. (2004). The dynamics of massification and differentiation: A comparative look at higher education systems in the United Kingdom and California. Higher Education Management & Policy, 16(3), 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dridi, M. (2013). Achieving education for all goals: Does corruption matter? In Munich personal RePEc archive (MPRA paper no. 47659).

  • Dunkin, M., & Barnes, J. (1985). Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzvimbo, P. (2003). The International migration of skilled human capital from developing countries. Paper presented at the report to regional training conference on improving tertiary education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Things That Work.

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., Brewer, D. J., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1998). Understanding academic performance at university: A research retrospective. London: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (2001). Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes, 30(5/6), 593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. G., & Grant, G. E. (1983). Intellectual levels in college classrooms. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2011). Adopting consumer time and the marketing of higher education. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion & E. Nixon (Eds.), The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, (pp. 52–63). UK: Routledge.

  • Gibson, R. (1976). Humour: A neglected area of educational studies? Education for Teaching, 101, 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravett, S., & Geyser, H. C. (2004). Teaching and learning in higher education. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643–679. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01355.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q., Schweisfurth, M., & Day, C. (2010). Learning and growing in a ‘foreign’ context: Intercultural experiences of international students. Compare, 40(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley-Brown, J. (2011). ‘The best education in the world’: Reality, repetition or cliché? International students’ reasons for choosing an English university. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 1005–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1999). The universal and the specific in 21st-century global management. Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 28(1), 34–43.

  • Holden, R., & Griggs, V. (2011). Supporting and teaching reflective learning in HR/HRD: making a difference? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the UFRD Conference, Cheltenham.

  • Hornsby, D. J., Osman, R., & De Matos-Ala, J. (Eds.). (2013). Large class pedagogy: Interdisciplinary perspectives for quality tertiary education. South Africa: SUN Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43(02), 154–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, D., & Perera, S. (2000). Validity of the IDEA student ratings of instruction system: An update. IDEA research report, 2.

  • Hwami, M. (2011). Understanding the crisis in higher education in Zimbabwe. In Critical perspectives on neoliberal globalization, development and education in Africa and Asia (pp. 103–119). Zimbabwe: Sense Publishers.

  • Jenkins, A. (2002). Comment on “class size.” Posted on: Listserv for the Professional & Organizational Development Network: Higher Education, June 27.

  • Jenkins, A. (2004). A guide to the research evidence on teaching-research relations. New York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. M. (2012). In defense of the sage on the stage: Escaping from the “sorcery” of learning styles and helping students learn how to learn. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 29(2), 191–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julia, M., & Veni, B. (2012). An analysis of the factors affecting students’ adjustment at a university in Zimbabwe. International Education Studies, 5(6), 244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2004). Crossborder education in a trade environment: Complexities and policy implications. The implications of WTO/GATS for higher education in Africa, 59.

  • Knight, J. (2006). Internationalization: Concepts, complexities and challenges. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 207–227): Springer.

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D. (2012). Higher ed shrinks. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/10/10/enrollments-fall-first-time.

  • Light, R. J. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B., & Locke, W. (2011). Questioning excellence in higher education. In R. Michele & V. Massimiliano (Eds.), Conceptions of excellence in teaching and learning and implications for future policy and practice (pp. 119–137). Zimbabwe: SensePublishers.

  • MacGregor, J., Cooper, J. L., Smith, K. A., & Robinson, P. (Eds.) (2000). Strategies for energizing large classes: From small groups to learning communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Maringe, F. (2010). Leading learning: Enhancing the learning experience of university students through anxiety auditing. Education, Knowledge & Economy, 4(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maringe, F., & Jennings, J. (2013). Stigma, tensions, and apprehension: The academic writing experience of international students. Journal of Humanities and Social ScienceI, ORS Journals.

  • Maringe, F., Foskett, N., & Woodfield, S. (2013). Emerging internationalisation models in an uneven global terrain: Findings from a global survey. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(1), 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 319–383). Netherlands: Springer.

  • McCroskey, J. C., & Vetta, R. D. (1978). Classroom seating arrangements: Instructional communication theory versus student preferences. Communication Education, 27, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. (1980). Class size, large classes, and multiple sections. Academe, 66, 24–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1987). Teaching and learning in the college classroom. A review of the Research Literature (1986) and November 1987 Supplement.

  • Nieto, C., & Booth, M. Z. (2010). Cultural competence its influence on the teaching and learning of international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(4), 406–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. U. (1978). Minority education and caste: The American system in cross-cultural perspective. New York: Academic Press.

  • Ogbu, J. U. (1992). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, 21(8), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okebukola, P. (2013). Open education and the march to 2020: Can Nigeria make it? Second Convocation Lecture, National Open University of Nigeria, January, 18.

  • Oliver, R. (2008). Engaging first year students using a Web-supported inquiry-based learning setting. Higher Education, 55(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. S. Y., & Wee, L. (2013). Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, J. G. (1984). Why many college teachers cannot lecture: How to avoid communication breakdown in the classroom. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

  • Pierrakakis, K. (2009). The sustainable growth paradigm: implications for technology and policy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Ramsden, P. (1999). The 1999 CEQ interim report.

  • Ratcliff, J. (1992). What they took and what they learned: Learning from assessment and transcript analysis. In Proceedings from the Asheville Institute on General Education, pp. 64–69.

  • Riggirozzi, P., Tussie, D., Quiliconi, C., & Tuozzo, F. (2011). Regional integration in developing countries: A comparative matrix of trade, health and education and lessons for Africa. (UNDP Human Development Report).. (in press). New York: United Nations Development Programme.

  • Rubalcava, M. (1991). Locating transformative teaching in multicultural education. Unpublished manuscript. University of California-Berkeley, Department of Anthropology, Special Project.

  • Sallis, E. (1996). Total quality management in education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayed, Y., Soudien, C., & Carrim, N. (2003). Discourses of exclusion and inclusion in the south: Limits and possibilities. Journal of Educational Change, 4, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secada, W. G. (1989). Agenda setting, enlightened self-interest, and equity in mathematics education. Peabody Journal of Education, 66(2), 22–56. doi:10.1080/01619568909538637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, O. (2005). E-learning and the future of distance education in the markets of the 21st century. Paper presented at the proceedings of EDEN 2005 annual conference.

  • Simpson, O. (2013). Supporting students in online, open & distance learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, O., Bramble, W., & Panda, S. (2008). Cost benefits of student retention policies and practices. Economics of distance and online learning, 162–178.

  • Smith, V. (1992). The purposes of general education and implications for pedagogy. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, K. I. (1984). Editor’s notes. Rejuvenating introductory courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, C. A., & Porter, M. E. (2002). Engaging large classes: Strategies and techniques for college faculty. Bolton: Anker Publishing.

  • Stones, E. (1970). Students’ attitudes toward the size of teaching groups. Educational Review, 21(2), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. J., & Hegarty, S. (1985). The best of both worlds? A review of research into the education of pupils of South Asian origin. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2004). Research into higher education: An a-theoretical community of practice? Higher Education Research and Development, 23(4), 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • UKCISA. (2011). United Kingdom Council for International Student Affairs: Sources of funding for international students 2011–12. UK: British Council, UKCISA: the UK Council for International Student Affairs, and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO).

  • Vandermensbrugghe, J. (2004). The unbearable vagueness of critical thinking in the context of the Anglo-Saxonisation of education. International Education Journal, 5(3), 417–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walqui, A. (2012). Instruction for diverse groups of English language learners. In Commissioned papers on language and literacy issues in the common core state standards and next generation science standards, 94, 94.

  • Weimer, M. (1993). Improving your classroom teaching. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D. H., Nyquist, J. D., & Abbott, R. D. (1987). Students’ perceptions of large classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987(32), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L., Powell, S. (2013). A white paper: MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667: Retrieved March, 21, 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Education Leadership and Policy Studies, School of Education, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand (Wits), Room Number: B163, Private Bag 3, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa

    Felix Maringe

  2. Division of Education Leadership and Policy Studies, School of Education, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, P.O. Box 17795, Norkem Park, Johannesburg, 1631, South Africa

    Nevensha Sing

Authors
  1. Felix Maringe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nevensha Sing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Maringe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maringe, F., Sing, N. Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalising higher education environment: pedagogical, quality and equity issues. High Educ 67, 761–782 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9710-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9710-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation