Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of project-based funding of research on budgeting and financial management in public universities

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of the paper is to explore—both theoretically and empirically—the implications of project-based research funding for budgeting and financial management at public universities. The theoretical contribution of the paper is to provide a synthesized discussion of the possible impacts of project-based funding on university financial management and budgeting. In the empirical part of the study, the cases of the two largest public universities in Estonia are used to uncover whether and in what form the effects outlined in the theoretical discussion have emerged. The study concludes that project-based funding of research gives rise to the following challenges: fluctuating revenues, fragmented revenue sources, high transaction costs, coordination problems, high complexity in managing the finances, difficulties in securing cash flows, and problems in covering indirect costs. The Estonian experience also indicates that extreme reliance on project-based funding of research—when combined with certain features of funding instruments and weak steering capacities of the central administration—can lead to a paradoxical situation: the more successful the research groups are in obtaining project-based funding from diverse sources, the more strained becomes the budget of the university as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D. A., & Stater, K. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 947–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. W., & Hartley, R. E. (2004). Sustaining drug courts in Arizona and South Carolina: An experience in hodgepodge budgeting. Justice System Journal, 25(1), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 28(3), 246–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A. (2001). The changing rationale for european university research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues, 35(3), 607–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B., & van der Knoop, H. (1999). “Budgeting at the institutional level: Responding to internal pressures and external opportunities”. In B. Jongbloed, P. Maassen, & G. Neave (Eds.), From the eye of the storm. Higher education’s changing institutions (pp. 141–164). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. W. (1999). Responsibility centre budgeting and responsibility centre management in theory and practice. Higher Education Management, 11(3), 81–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2006a). The art of getting funded: How scientists adapt to their funding conditions. Science and Public Policy, 33(7), 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2006b). The ‘quality myth’: Promoting and hindering conditions for acquiring research funds. Higher Education, 52(3), 375–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori, B., Dinges, M., Reale, E., Slipersaeter, S., Theves, J., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2007). Comparing the evolution of national research policies: What patterns of change? Science and Public Policy, 34(6), 372–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori, B., Masso, J., Jabłecka, J., Sima, K., & Ukrainski, K. (2009). Comparing the organization of public research funding in central and eastern european countries. Science and Public Policy, 36(9), 667–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori, B., Usher, J., & Montauti, M. (2013). Budgetary allocation and organizational characteristics of higher education institutions: A review of existing studies and a framework for future research. Higher Education, 65(1), 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46(4), 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, M. J. G. (2006). Towards decentralized and goal-oriented models of institutional resource allocation: The Spanish case. Higher Education, 51(4), 589–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masso, J., & Ukrainski, K. (2009). Competition for public project funding in a small research system: The case of Estonia. Science and Public Policy, 36(9), 683–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. (2003). Academic researchers as ‘agents’ of science policy. Science and Public Policy, 30(5), 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N., & Rip, A. (2006). Scientists’ coping strategies in an evolving research system: The case of life scientists in the UK. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D. (2013). Contemporary University strategising: The financial imperative. Financial Accountability and Management, 29(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organisational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, J. V. (2012) “Modes of public funding of research and development: Towards internationally comparable indicators.” OECD science, technology and industry working papers, 2012/04.

  • Thomas, H. (2000). Power in the resource allocation process: The impact of ‘rational’ systems. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, E. L. (1991). Responsibility center budgeting: An approach to decentralized management for institutions of higher education. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, O. H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher Education, 45(3), 307–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zierdt, G. L. (2009). Responsibility-centred budgeting: An emerging trend in higher education budget reform. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(4), 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research for this paper has been partially supported by the European Social Fund through the Research and Innovation Policy Monitoring Programme and by the Estonian Research Council’s institutional Grant No. IUT19-13.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ringa Raudla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raudla, R., Karo, E., Valdmaa, K. et al. Implications of project-based funding of research on budgeting and financial management in public universities. High Educ 70, 957–971 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9875-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9875-9

Keywords

Navigation