Skip to main content
Log in

A Complex-Systems Approach to Pastoral Commons

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years a new approach has begun to emerge in commons scholarship that draws on complex systems thinking and that makes use of concepts such as fit, scale, and the adaptive renewal cycle. This paper explores what complex systems thinking has to offer for commons scholarship by applying these concepts to the pastoral commons of the Gabra ethnic group of north-central Kenya. The concepts of fit and scale can help us to understand why some features of the institutional regime of the Gabra do not conform to mainstream principles such as clearly defined boundaries, clearly defined membership rules, and subsidiarity. The notion of the adaptive renewal cycle can help us to describe and understand some aspects of dynamics of Gabra institutions, especially those related to the management of shallow wells. Applying the adaptive renewal cycle to larger and longer scales highlights the possibility that the Gabra social–ecological system is becoming increasingly brittle, with evolving institutional arrangements putting more and more constraints on adaptation and especially on nomadic mobility. An examination of the distinctive nature of dryland pastoral commons, and in particular a complex systems approach to this examination, suggests a number of issues that relief and development organizations should consider, including how to foster novelty and innovation through all the phases of the adaptive cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some livestock theft that takes place in Kenya is for purposes of restocking, some is done on a more commercial basis with the livestock being sent to market. Looking at a scale larger than the Gabra social–ecological system, say all of northern Kenya and southern Ethiopia, an interesting question beyond the scope of this research is whether livestock theft is in some ways adaptive—whether it is a system response to increasing pressure on the environment.

  2. I hope in a future paper to explore in greater detail the resilience of the Gabra social–ecological system, and the loss of that resilience.

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and Ecological Resilience: Are they Related? Progress in Human Geography 24: 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., and Fajber, L. (2006). Exclusive, moi? Natural resource management, poverty, inequality and gender in Asia. In Tyler, S. R. (ed.), Communities, Livelihoods and Natural Resources: Action Research and Policy Change in Asia. ITDG Publishing/IDRC, Warwickshire, pp. 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2002). Cross-Scale Institutional Linkages: Perspectives from the Bottom Up. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2006). From Community-Based Resource Management to Complex Systems: The Scale Issue and Marine Commons. Ecology and Society 11: 45. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art45/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2007). Community-Based Conservation in a Globalized World. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 15188–15193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.) (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds.) (2003). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., and Abel, N. (2001). From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4: 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, D. J. (2006). Sustainable Livelihoods and Ecosystem Health: Understanding Similarities and Reconciling Differences. Paper presented at the Sustainable Livelihoods & Ecosystem Health: Informing Policy, Practice and Research Conference, Guelph, Canada, 4–7 June 2006.

  • Cousins, B. (2000). Tenure and common property resources in Africa. In Toulmin, C., and Quan, J. F. (eds.), Evolving Land Rights, Policy and Tenure in Africa. DFID, IIED, NRI, London, pp. 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P. C. (2003). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science 302: 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social–Ecological Systems Analyses. Global Environmental Change 16: 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Colding, J., and Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: Building Resilience and Adaptive Capacity in Social-Ecological Systems. In Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds.), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 352–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganya, C., Haro, G. O., and Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (2004). Conservation of Dryland Biodiversity by Mobile Indigenous people—the Case of the Gabbra of Northern Kenya. Policy Matters 13: 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, S. (2006). Managing Small-Scale Fisheries in the Caribbean: The Surface Longline Fishery in Gouyave, Grenada. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological Resilience: In Theory and Application. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 31: 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.) (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  • Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., and Peterson, G. D. (2002). Surprises and Sustainability: Cycles of Renewal in the Everglades. In Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haro, G. O., Doyo, G. J., and McPeak, J. G. (2005). Linkages between Community, Environmental, and Conflict Management: Experiences from Northern Kenya. World Development 33: 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 4: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological and Social Systems. Ecosystems 4: 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., and Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and Adaptive Cycles. In Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature. Island, Washington, D.C., pp. 25–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1998). Science, Sustainability and Resource Management. In Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 342–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2004). Uncommon Ground: The ‘Poverty of History’ in Common Property Discourse. Development and Change 35: 407–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M., and Francis, G. (1999). An Ecosystem Approach for Sustainability: Addressing the Challenge of Complexity. Futures 31: 721–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, J. (2003). In Focus: Health—An Ecosystem Approach. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, B., Ostrom, E., Simon, C., and Wilson, J. (2003). Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management? In Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds.), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeak, J. G. (2005). Individual and Collective Rationality in Pastoral Production: Evidence from Northern Kenya. Human Ecology 33: 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeak, J. G. (2003). Analyzing and Addressing Localized Degradation in the Commons. Land Economics 79: 515–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Environment Management Authority (2006). Climate Change Impacts/Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation Options. Accessed 1 May 2006. http://www.nema.go.ke/CCADAPASSESS.pdf

  • Nayak, P. K. (2006). Access and Entitlements: A Complexity Approach. Paper presented at the Property and Access to Resources: Fuzzy Concepts; Fuzzy Realities. Bornholm, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., and Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges. Science 284: 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting Institutions for Self-governing Irrigation Systems. Institute of Contemporary Studies, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, D. J., Epstein, P. R., Levins, R., Costanza, R., and Gaudet, C. (1998). Ecosystem Health. Blackwell, Malden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, J. C. (1982). Land Tenure Issues in West African Livestock Range Development Projects. Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. W. (1985). Gabbra Nomadic Pastoralism in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Northern Kenya: Strategies for Survival in a Marginal Environment.

  • Robinson, L. W., and Fuller, A. M. (2005). Taking Complexity Seriously in Rural Development Policy: Insights from Ecosystem Health and Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches. Paper presented at the Fourth International Rural Network Conference, Abingdon, pp. 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (1991). Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin and Fabrication of Life. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., Westley, F., Brock, W. A., and Holmgren, M. (2002). Dynamic Interaction of Societies and Ecosystems—Linking Theories from Ecology, Economy, and Sociology. In Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature. Island, Washington, D.C., pp. 195–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (1999). New Ecology and the Social Sciences: What Prospects for a Fruitful Engagement? Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 479–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (2004). Climate Change and the Challenge of Non-Equilibrium Thinking. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin 35: 114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, C. S., and Berkes, F. (2003). Dynamics of social–ecological changes in a lagoon fishery in southern Brazil. In Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds.), Navigating Social Ecology Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N., and Gilman, J. (2000). Embracing the Complexity of SL Systems. Paper presented at the Sustainable Livelihoods Seminar, Guelph.

  • Swallow, B. M. (1990). Strategies and Tenure in African Livestock Development. Land Tenure Center paper no. 140. Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torry, W. I. (1973). Subsistence Ecology among the Gabra: Nomads of the Kenya/Ethiopia Frontier.

  • Walker, B., and Abel, N. (2002). Resilient Rangelands: Adaptation in Complex Systems. In Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature. Island, Washington, D.C., pp. 293–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltner-Toews, D. (2004). Ecosystem Sustainability and Health: A Practical Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2002). Scientific Uncertainty, Complex Systems, and the Design of Common-Pool Institutions. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 327–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale. MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research on which this paper was based was carried out with financial and in-kind support from the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the International Development Research Centre, the Canada Research Chair in Community Based Resource Management, the Pastoralist Integrated Support Programme, and the International Livestock Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lance W. Robinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, L.W. A Complex-Systems Approach to Pastoral Commons. Hum Ecol 37, 441–451 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9253-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9253-2

Keywords

Navigation