Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in a reach of the River Allier (France), in relation to riverbed characteristics

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macroinvertebrate assemblages of large alluvial streams are poorly documented. This study identified the physical characteristics affecting the macroinvertebrates community distribution in a large alluvial river devoid of major anthropogenic impacts. It was oriented towards the influence of the characteristics of the physical habitat (velocity, depth, grain-size classes of mineral substrates, macrophytes) on macroinvertebrates (richness, density, body size, feeding habits), with particular attention to the pollution-sensitive taxa. The study was carried out in June during a period of hydrological stability. The effects of water velocity, depth and substrates on taxa were evaluated with multivariate analyses. Mineral substrates were most abundant while macrophytes accounted for only 3% of sampled habitat. Invertebrates that were present were those characteristics of the transition zone between upper and middle life reaches. Among the 63 taxa sampled, 14 were abundant. In relation to the characteristics of the physical environment, the macroinvertebrate assemblages were discriminated by substrate, velocity, and depth. Habitat exploitation, however, appeared complex. The highest community richness, EPT richness, and density were found in various substrates where the velocity ranged between 30 and 120 cm s−1, depths ranged from 16 to 50 cm. The most pollution-sensitive taxa preferred riffle habitats with velocities >70 cm s−1 and substrate >64 mm. This suggest that rapid bioassessment programmes should be carried out in the mineral substrates of the geomorphological unit riffles where richness is high and density sufficient to represent the macroinvertebrate community, including pollution-sensitive taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFNor, 1992. Essai des eaux- Détermination de l’indice biologique global normalisé (IBGN). Association française de normalisation, norme homologuée T-90-350

  • Armitage P. D., Moss D., Wright J. F. and Furse M. T. (1983). The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Research 17: 333–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stribling, 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish 2nd edn. EPA 841-B-99-002, U.S-Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • Boyero L. (2003). The quantification of local substrate heterogeneity in streams and its significance for macroinvertebrates assemblages. Hydrobiologia 499: 161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chester, R. K., 1980. Biological Monitoring Working Party. The 1978 national testing exercise: Technical Memorandum 19

  • Cummins K. W. and Klug M. J. (1979). Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annual Reviews of Ecological Systems 10: 147–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing C. E. and Allan J. D. (2001). Streams, their Ecology and Life. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • DEV (Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.), 1992. Biologisch-ökologische Gewässergütentersuchung: Bestimmung des Saprobienindex (M2). In: Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammuntersuchung. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim, 1–13

  • Vanhooren G. (1983). Method for biological quality assessment of water courses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia 100: 153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downward S. R. (1995). Information for topographic survey. In: Gurnell, A. and Petts, G. (eds) Changing Rivers Channels, pp 303–323. Wiley and Sons Publishers, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans L. J. and Norris R. H. (1997). Predicition of benthic macroinvertebrate composition using microhabitat characteristics derived from stereophotography. Freshwater Biology 37: 621–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayraud S., Statzner B., Bady P., Haybachp A., Schöll F., Usseglio-Polatera P. and Bacchi M. (2003). Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an initial assessment of alternative metrics. Freshwater Biology 48: 2045–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghetti, P.F., 1997. Manuale di applicazione Indice Biotico Esteso (IBE). I macroinvertebrati nell’controllo della qualità degli ambienti di aque correnti. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, agenzia provinciale per la protezione dell’ambienti

  • Graça M. A. S., Pinto P., Cortes R., Coimbra N., Oliveira S., Morais M., Carvalho M. J. and Malo J. (2004). Factors affecting macroinvertebrate richness and diversity in Portuguese streams: a two-scale analysis. International Review of Hydrobiology 89: 151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubaugh J. W., Wallace J. B. and Houston E. S. (1996). Longitudinal changes of macroinvertebrate communities along an Appalachian stream continuum. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 896–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1986. Keynote Adress. In Dodge, D. P. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: 5–10

  • Irvine K. (2004). Classifying ecologicla status under the European Water Framework Directive: the need for monitoring to account for natural variability. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivol-Rigaut J.-M, Guinand B., Richoux P. and Tachet H. (1997). Longitudinal changes in Trichoptera and Coleoptera assemblages and environmental conditions in the Loire River (France). Archiv für Hydrobiology 138: 525–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr J. R. (1999). Defining and measuring river health. Freshwater Biology 41: 221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, D. J., P. A. Lewis, F. Fulk & J. M. Lazorchak, 1990. Macroinvertebrate Field and Laboratory Methods for Evaluating the Biological Integrity of Surface Waters, EPA. 600/4-90/030, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Modeling, Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurances, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH

  • Leopold L. B. (1994). A view of the River. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhart J., Vlčkova S. and Uvíra V. (2002). Moss-dwelling meiobenthos and flow velocity in low-order streams. Acta Universalis Palackianae Olomucensis Facultas Rerum Naturalium (2001–2002). Biologica 39–40: 111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan P. and Furse M. (2002). Preparing for the European Water Framework Directive making the links between habitat and aquatic biota. Aquatic Conservatrion: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12: 425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malavoi J. R and Souchon Y. (2002). Description standardisée des principaux faciès d’écoulement observables en rivière: clé de détermination qualitative et mesures physiques. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 365/366: 357–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Maridet L., Wasson J.-G., Philippe M., Amoros C. and Naiman R. J. (1998). Trophic structure of three streams with contrasting riparian vegetation and geomorphology. Archiv für Hydrobiology 144: 61–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Mérigoux S. and Dolédec S. (2004). Hydraulic requirements of stream communities: a case of study on invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 49: 600–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., 1984. Aquatic insect- substratum relationships. In Resh, V. H. & D. M. Rosenberg Publishers. The ecology of aquatic insects, Praeger, New-York: 358–400

  • Monakov A. B. (2003). Feeding of Freshwater Invertebrates. Kenobi productions, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson S. M. and Lieberman D. M. (2002). The influence of flow and other environmental factors on benthic invertebrates in the Sacramento River, USA. Hydrobiologia 489: 117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnikoff R. and Wiseman C. (2001). Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biological Monitoring Protocols for Rivers and Streams. Dept. Ecology. Olympia, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel L. L., Richardson J. S. and Healey M. C. (2000). Macroinvertebrates community structure along gradients of hydraulic and sedimentary conditions in a large gravel-bed river. Freshwater Biology 45: 57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson T. B., Norris R. H., Resh V. H., Day K. E. and Rosenberg D. M. (1997). The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 833–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards C., Haro R. J., Johnson L. C. and Host G. E. (1997). Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology 37: 219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg D. M. and Resh V. H. (1993). Freshwater Monitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Skriver, J., N. Friberg & J. Kirkegaard, 2000. Biological assessment of water course quality in denmark: introduction of the Danish Stream Fauna Index (DSFI) as the official biomonitoring method. – Verhandlungen. Internationale Vereinigung Für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 27: 1822

  • Smith M. J., Ky W. R., Edward H. D, Papas P. J., Richardson K. St J., Simpson J. C., Pinder A. M., Dale D. J., Horwitz P.H.J., Davis J. A., Yung F. H., Norris R. H. and Halse S. A. (1999). AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia. Freshwater Biology 41: 269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (1999). SPSS version 10.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood T. R. E. (1977). Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies. Journal of Animal Ecology 46: 337–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood T. R. E. (1988). Tactics, strategies and templets. Oikos 52: 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner B., Gore J. A. and Resh V. H. (1988). Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. Journal of the North American Society 7: 307–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A. N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38: 913–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachet H., Richoux P., Bournaud M. and Usseglio-Polatera P. (2000). Invertébrés d’eau douce. Systématique, biologie, écologie. CNRS Editions, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Thioulouse J., Chessel D., Dolédec S. and Olivier J. M. (1997). A multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing 7: 75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend C. R. (1989). The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8: 36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend C. R. and Hildrew A. G. (1994). Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biology 31: 265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J., 1994. Macrobenthos et l’état de santé des eaux douces. Fondements, contraintes et perspectives. In Etat de santé des écosystèmes aquatiques. Les variables biologiques comme indicateurs- Acte du séminaire national – Cemagref editions

  • Wallace J. B., Grubaugh J. W. and Whiles M. R. (1996). Biotic indices and stream ecosystem processes: results from an experimental study. Ecological Applications 6: 140–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J. V. (1992). Biology and Habitat. In Aquatic Insect Ecology 1. John Wiley & Sons Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodiwiss F. S. (1964). The biological system of stream classification used by Trent River Board. Chemistry and Industry 83: 443–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl D. L., Wallace J. B. and Meyer J. L. (1995). Benthic macroinvertebrates community structure, function and production with respect to habitat type, reach and drainage basin in the Southern Appalachians (USA). Freshwater Biology 34: 447–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J. F., Armitage P. D., Furse M. T. and Moss D. (1984). The classification of sites on British rivers using macroinvertebrates. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereiningung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 22: 1939–1943

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar J. H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall Publishers, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Géographie Physique et Environnementale. GEOLAB, UMR 6042 CNRS, Université de Clermont-Ferrand 2, Maison de la Recherche, 4 rue Ledru, 63057, Clermont-Ferrand, Cedex 1, France

    A. Beauger, N. Lair, P. Reyes-Marchant & J.-L. Peiry

Authors
  1. A. Beauger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Lair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Reyes-Marchant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J.-L. Peiry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Beauger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beauger, A., Lair, N., Reyes-Marchant, P. et al. The distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in a reach of the River Allier (France), in relation to riverbed characteristics. Hydrobiologia 571, 63–76 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0217-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0217-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation