Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response of zoobenthic communities to changing eutrophication in the northern Baltic Sea

  • Biodiversity in Enclosed Seas
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationships between the concentration of water nutrients and the biomass of benthic invertebrate feeding guilds were examined at 46 sites in the northern Baltic Sea during 1993–2003. We analysed whether and how degree of exposure, presence of fronts, salinity, hypoxia, nutrient concentrations, depth, sediment type and structure of invertebrate communities contributed to these relationships. In general macrozoobenthos did not respond to the changing nutrient concentrations in the areas that were regularly impacted by fronts (river estuaries, bank slopes, straits). Macrobenthic species diversity, depth, 11-year average of nutrient concentration and sediment type explained best how strong the nutrient-invertebrate relationships were. The deposit feeders, that inhabited more diverse communities, were less sensitive to the increased concentration of nutrients than those in less diverse communities. On the other hand, the sensitivity of suspension feeders to rising nutrient load increased with benthic diversity. The response of macrozoobenthos to nitrogen level decreased with increasing depth. Our data did not support the hypothesis that there was a significant difference in the occurrence of nutrient-invertebrate relationships between hypoxic and normoxic conditions. The probability of finding negative nutrient-invertebrate relationships increased with depth. The results pointed to nitrogen limitation in the coarse and fine sediments and phosphorus limitation in the mixed sediments. Increased nitrogen values strengthened the response of suspension feeders to the concentration of phosphorus. Increasing phosphorus level dampened the relationships between benthic functions and concentration of phosphorus. This study confirmed that depth and sediment type were the best regularly monitored abiotic variables that could be used to determine the type areas within the northern Baltic Sea in sensu the European Community Water Framework Directive. As the nutrient-invertebrate relationships were significantly modified by macrobenthic diversity, the environmental classification should incorporate specific biological measures such as benthic diversity in order to better describe the quality status of the water body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersin, A. B., J. Lassig, L. Parkkonen & H. Sandler, 1978. The decline of macrofauna in the deeper parts of the Baltic Proper and the Gulf of Finland. Kieler Meeresforschungen. Sonderheft. 4: 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. G. & P. S. Meadows, 1978. Microenvironments in marine sediments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 76B: 1–16.

  • Beukema, J. J. & G. C. Cadée, 1997. Local differences in macrozoobenthic response to enhanced food supply caused by mild eutrophication in a Wadden Sea area: food is only locally a limiting factor. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 1424–1435.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsdorff, E., K. Aarnio & E. Sandberg, 1991. Temporal and spatial variability of zoobenthic communities in archipelago waters of the northern Baltic Sea – consequences of eutrophication. International Review of Hydrobiology 76: 433–450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsdorff, E. & T. H. Pearson, 1999. Variation in the sublittoral macrozoobenthos of the Baltic Sea along environmental gradients: a functional-group approach. Australian Journal of Ecology 24: 312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. B. & J. T. Curtis, 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederwall, H. & R. Elmgren, 1980. Biomass increase of benthic macrofauna demonstrates eutrophication of the Baltic Sea. Ophelia, supplement 1: 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C. 1984. The Analysis of Time Series. An Introduction. 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, 286 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. & M. Ainsworth, 1993. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series 92: 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edn. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.

  • Cloern, J. E., 1982. Does the benthos control phytoplankton biomass in South San Francisco Bay? Marine Ecology Progress Series 9: 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E., 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 210: 223–253.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dame, R. F., 1996. Ecology of Marine Bivalves: An Ecosystem Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 254 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmgren, R., 2001. Understanding human impact on the Baltic ecosystem: changing views in recent decades. Ambio 30: 222–231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Union, 2000. Directive of the European Parliament and the Council Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Legislative acts and other instruments. ENV221 CODEC 513. European Union.

  • Grall, J. & L. Chauvaud, 2002. Marine eutrophication and benthos: the need for new approaches and concepts. Global Change Biology 8: 813–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granéli, E. & K. Sundbäck, 1985. The response of planktonic and microbenthic algal assemblages to nutrient enrichment in shallow coastal waters, southwest Sweden. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 85: 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granéli, E., K. Wallström, U. Larsson, W. Granéli & R. Elmgren, 1990. Nutrient limitation of primary production in the Baltic Sea area. Ambio 19: 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J., A. Hatcher, D. B. Scott, P. Pocklington, C. T. Schafer & G. Winter, 1995. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluating benthic impacts of shellfish aquaculture. Estuaries 18: 124–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grasshoff K., 1976. Methods of Seawater Analysis. Chemie, New York, 317 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasshoff, K. & A. Voipio, 1981. Chemical oceanography. In Voipio, A. (ed.), The Baltic Sea, Vol. 30. Elsevier Oceanography Series, Amsterdam, 183–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. S. 1992. Eutrophication in the sea. In Colombo, G., I. Ferrari, V. U. Ceccherelli & R. Rossi (eds), Marine Eutrophication and Population Dynamics. Proceedings of the 25th European Marine Biology Symposium, Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, 3–15.

  • Gray, J. S., R. S. Wu & Y. Y. Or, 2002. Effects of hypoxia and organic enrichment on the coastal marine environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 238: 249–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebmeier, J. M., H. M. Feder & C. P. McRoy, 1989. Pelagic-benthic coupling on the shelf of the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas 2. Benthic community structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series 51: 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hällfors, G., Å. Niemi, H. Ackefors, J. Lassig & E. Leppäkoski, 1981. Biological oceanography. In Voipio, A. (ed.), The Baltic Sea, Vol. 30. Elsevier Oceanography Series, Amsterdam, 219–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K. & E. Kristensen, 1998. The impact of the polychaete Nereis diversicolor and enrichment with macroalgal (Chaetomorpha linum) detritus on benthic metabolism and nutrient dynamics in organic-poor and organic-rich sediment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 231: 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HELCOM, 2002. Environment of the Baltic Sea area 1994–1998. Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings 82B: 1–215.

  • Herkül, K., J. Kotta, I. Kotta & H. Orav-Kotta, 2006. Effects of physical disturbance, isolation and key macrozoobenthic species on community development, recolonisation and sedimentation processes. Oceanologia 48: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. W., 1988. Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josefson, A. B. & B. Rasmussen, 2000. Nutrient retention by benthic macrofaunal biomass of Danish estuaries: importance of nutrient load and residence time. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 50: 205–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlson, K., R. Rosenberg & E. Bonsdorff, 2002. Temporal and spatial large-scale effects of eutrophication and oxygen deficiency on benthic fauna in Scandinavian and Baltic waters – a review. Oceanography and Marine Biology. An Annual Review 40: 427–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, U., 1995. Ecosystem Processes in Coastal Areas of the Baltic Sea. Ph.D. thesis. Stockholm University.

  • Kivi, K., S. Kaitala, H. Kuosa, J. Kuparinen, E. Leskinen, R. Lignell, B. Marcusse & T. Tamminen, 1993. Nutrient limitation and grazing control of the Baltic plankton community during annual succession. Limnology and Oceanography 38: 893–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotta, I., H. Orav-Kotta & J. Kotta, 2003. Macrozoobenthos assemblages in highly productive areas of the Estonian coastal sea. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Biology. Ecology 52: 149–165.

  • Kotta, J., 2000. Impact of eutrophication and biological invasions on the structure and functions of benthic macrofauna. Dissertationes Biologicae Universitatis Tartuensis, 63, Tartu University Press: 1–160.

  • Kotta, J. & I. Kotta, 1995. The state of macrozoobenthos of Pärnu Bay in 1991 as compared to 1959–1960. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Ecology 5: 26–37.

  • Kotta J., I. Kotta & J. Kask, 1999. Benthic animal communities of exposed bays in the western Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea). Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Biology. Ecology 48: 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotta, J., I. Kotta & I. Viitasalo, 2000. Effect of diffuse and point source nutrient supply on the low diverse macrozoobenthic communities of the northern Baltic Sea. Boreal Environmental Research 5: 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotta, J. & F. Møhlenberg, 2002. Grazing impact of Mytilus edulis L. and Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) in the Gulf of Riga, Baltic Sea estimated from biodeposition rates of algal pigments. Annales Zoologici Fennici 39: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotta, J., H. Orav-Kotta & I. Vuorinen, 2005. Field measurements on the variability in biodeposition and grazing pressure of suspension feeding bivalves in the northern Baltic Sea. In Dame R. & S. Olenin (eds), The Comparative Roles of Suspension Feeders in Ecosystems. Springer, The Netherlands, Dordrecht: 11–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kullas, T., M. Otsmann & Ü. Suursaar, 2000. Comparative calculation of flows in the straits of the Gulf of Riga and the Väinameri. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Engineering 6: 284–294.

  • Kullenberg, G., 1981. Physical oceanography. In Voipio, A. (ed.), The Baltic Sea, Vol. 30. Elsevier Oceanography Series, Amsterdam, 135–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine, A. O., H. Sandler, A. B. Andersin & J. Stigzelius, 1997. Long-term changes of macrozoobenthos in the eastern Gotland basin and the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea) in relation to the hydrographical regime. Journal of Sea Research 38: 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsson, E. B., 1986. Density dependence in suspension-feeding and deposit-feeding populations of the bivalve Macoma balthica: a field experiment. Journal of Animal Ecology 55:517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otsmann, M., Ü. Suursaar & T. Kullas, 2001. The oscillatory nature of the flows in the system of straits and small semienclosed basins of the Baltic Sea. Continental Shelf Research 21: 1577–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, T. H. & R. Rosenberg, 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology. An Annual Review 16: 229–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. J. & K. L. Heck Jr, 2001. Positive interactions between suspension-feeding bivalves and seagrasses – a facultative mutualism. Marine Ecology Progress Series 213: 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C., 1975. Ecological Diversity. John Wiley and Sons ed., NY, 165 pp.

  • Posey, M. H., T. D. Alphin, L. Cahoon, D. Lindquist & M. E. Becker, 1999. Interactive effects of nutrient additions and predation on infaunal communities. Estuaries 22: 785–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimbault, P. & G. Slawyk, 1991. A semiautomatic, wet-oxidation method for the determination of particulate organic nitrogen collected on filters. Limnology and Oceanography 36: 405–408.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rönnberg, C. & E. Bonsdorff, 2004. Baltic Sea eutrophication: area-specific ecological consequences. Hydrobiologia 514: 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segerstråle, S., 1957. Baltic Sea. Geological Society of America. Memoir 67: 757–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA, 859 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solorzano, L. & J. H. Sharp, 1980. Determination of total dissolved nitrogen in natural waters. Limnology and Oceanography 25: 751–754.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc., 2004. Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. WEB: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html.

  • Tenore, K. R., J. Corral, N. Gonzalez & E. Lopez-Jamar, 1985. Effects of intense mussel culture on food chain patterns and production in coastal Galicia, NW Spain. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Utilization of Coastal Ecosystems: Planning, Pollution and Productivity. Rio Grande, Brazil 1: 321–328.

  • Viitasalo, M., I. Vuorinen & S. Saesmaa, 1995. Mesozooplankton dynamics in the northern Baltic Sea: implications of variations in hydrography and climate. Journal of Plankton Research 17: 1857–1878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, M., 1991. Short and long term changes in the benthic community of the deeper part of Kiel Bay (Western Baltic) due to oxygen depletion and eutrophication. Meeresforschung/Report marine Research 33: 197–244.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financed by the Estonian Target Financing Programmes Nos 0182578s03 and 0182579s03, Estonian Science Foundation grant No 6015, 6016 and EU CHARM project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Mäealuse 10 a, 12618, Tallinn, Estonia

    Jonne Kotta, Velda Lauringson & Ilmar Kotta

  2. Institute of Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014, Tartu, Estonia

    Velda Lauringson

Authors
  1. Jonne Kotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Velda Lauringson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilmar Kotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonne Kotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotta, J., Lauringson, V. & Kotta, I. Response of zoobenthic communities to changing eutrophication in the northern Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia 580, 97–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0462-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0462-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation