Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dissimilarity of stream insect assemblages: effects of multiple scales and spatial distances

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In addition to the effects of environmental conditions, biotic assemblages may exhibit spatial structure depending on the scale of study. We tested whether the dissimilarity of stream insect assemblages is related to two types of spatial distances (stream corridor and overland distance), and evaluated the relative importance of diversity components at multiple spatial scales. Field data included assemblages of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera found in 16 streams in four microbasins. We evaluated the relationship of the dissimilarity of assemblages with the distance types, using Mantel tests. In addition, we evaluated the relationships among the diversity components at multiple spatial scales, using additive partitioning analysis. The biological dissimilarities were correlated only with the geographical distances. Additive partitioning showed that the values of richness observed in the β1 (among Surber), β2 (among riffles), β3 (among streams), and β4 (among microbasins) were higher than those expected. The highest variation of the richness was found in β3 (30.6%). We conclude that stream faunas are distributed in patches all over the studied spatial extent, causing a weak relationship of biological dissimilarity with distance but important beta components when compared to a completely homogenous distribution of the fauna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D., 2004. Landscape and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyero, L., 2003. Multiscale patterns of spatial variation in stream macroinvertebrate communities. Ecological Research 18: 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckup, L., A. A. P. Bueno, G. Bond-Buckup, M. Casagrande & F. Majolo, 2007. The benthic macroinvertebrates fauna of highland streams in southern Brazil: composition, diversity and structure. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 24: 294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, S. & J. Hughes, 1997. Dispersal and recruitment in streams: evidence from genetic studies. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 338–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candy, S., D. J. Gibson & P. A. Robertson, 2006. Additive partitioning of diversity across hierarchical spatial scales in a forest landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 792–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., R. M. Nally, N. Bond & P. S. Lake, 2008. Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review. Freshwater Biology 53: 1707–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., R. M. Nally, N. Bond & P. S. Lake, 2010. Conserving macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: the importance of knowing the relative contribution of α and β diversity. Diversity and Distributions 16: 725–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. J. & B. L. Clements, 2011. Influences of catchment and corridor imperviousness on urban stream macroinvertebrate communities at multiple spatial scales. Hydrobiologia 664: 35–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. & B. Smith, 1998. Dispersal of adult caddisflies (Trichoptera) into forests alongside three New Zealand streams. Hydrobiologia 361: 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, S. S. & A. S. Melo, 2008. Beta diversity in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: among-site and among-microhabitat components. Hydrobiologia 598: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, T. O., J. A. Veech, J. C. Gering & K. S. Summerville, 2003. Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of α, β, and γ diversity. The American Naturalist 162: 734–743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, B. J., J. S. Hindell & N. R. Bond, 2000. What’s in a site? Variation in lotic macroinvertebrate density and diversity in a spatially replicated experiment. Austral Ecology 25: 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encalada, A. C. & B. L. Peckarsky, 2006. Selective oviposition behavior of the mayfly Baetis bicaudatus. Oecologia 162: 734–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, H. R. & E. Domínguez, 2001. Guía para la Determinación de los Artrópodos Bentónicos Sudamericanos. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gering, J. C. & T. Crist, 2002. The alpha–beta–regional relationship: providing new insights into local–regional patterns of species richness and scale dependence of diversity components. Ecology Letters 5: 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino, J. & H. Mykrä, 2008. Control of stream insect assemblages: roles of spatial configuration and local environmental factors. Ecological Entomology 33: 614–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino, J., P. Louhi & T. Muotka, 2004. Identifying the scales of variability in stream macroinvertebrate abundance, functional composition and assemblage structure. Freshwater Biology 49: 1230–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, L. U., V. L. Landeiro & A. S. Melo, 2012. Experimental assessment of the effects of environmental factors and longitudinal position on alpha and beta diversities of aquatic insects in a Neotropical stream. International Review of Hydrobiology 97: 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landeiro, V. L., L. M. Bini, A. S. Melo, A. M. O. Pes & W. E. Magnusson, 2012. The roles of dispersal limitation and environmental conditions in controlling caddisfly (Trichoptera) assemblages. Freshwater Biology 57: 1554–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, R. C., 1973. Levantamento de reconhecimento de solos do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Boletim Técnico n. 30. Ministério da Agricultura, Recife.

  • Li, J., A. Herlihy, W. Gerth, P. Kaufmann, S. Gregory, S. Urquhart & D. P. Larsen, 2001. Variability in stream macroinvertebrates at multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 46: 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligeiro, R., A. S. Melo & M. Callisto, 2010. Spatial scale and the diversity of macroinvertebrates in a Neotropical catchment. Freshwater Biology 55: 424–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist, B., 2002. Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47: 679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, A. S., 2005. Effects of taxonomic and numeric resolution on the ability to detect ecological patterns at local scale using stream macroinvertebrates. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 164: 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins, 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 3rd ed. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co, Dubuque: 862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K., 1982. The colonization cycle of freshwater insects. Oecologia 52: 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mykrä, H., J. Heino & T. Muotka, 2004. Variability of lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages and stream habitat characteristics across hierarchical landscape classifications. Environmental Management 34: 341–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mykrä, H., J. Heino & T. Muoka, 2007. Scale-related patters in the spatial and environmental components of stream macroinvertebrate assemblage variation. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, R. G. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens & H. Wagner, 2010. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.17-0 [available on internet at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan].

  • Parsons, M., M. C. Thoms & R. H. Norris, 2003. Scales of macroinvertebrate distribution in relation to the hierarchical organization of river systems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M., M. C. Thoms & R. H. Norris, 2004. Using hierarchy to select scales of measurement in multiscale studies of stream macroinvertebrate assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, I., Z. Masters, A. G. Hildrew & J. Ormerod, 2004. Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchments of differing land use. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 934–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, D. B., P. I. Prado, K. S. Brown Jr & A. V. L. Freitas, 2008. Additive partitioning of butterfly diversity in a fragmented landscape: importance of scale and implications for conservation. Diversity and Distributions 14: 961–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, B. & E. Chester, 1999. Spatial patterns of invertebrate species richness in a river: the relationship between riffles and microhabitats. Australian Journal of Ecology 24: 599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stendera, S. E. S. & R. K. Johnson, 2005. Additive partitioning of aquatic invertebrate species diversity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 50: 1360–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 [available on internet at http://www.R-project.org].

  • Thompson, R. & C. Townsend, 2006. A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 476–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30: 279–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterbourn, M. J., W. L. Chadderton, S. A. Entrekin, J. L. Tank & J. S. Harding, 2007. Distribution and dispersal of adult stream insect in a heterogeneous montane environment. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 168: 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. & O. L. Loucks, 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. The Quaternary Review of Biology 70: 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Igré Amigos da Água and its former president Georgina Bond-Buckup for logistical support during fieldwork. Silvia Vendruscolo Milesi assisted in fieldwork. Rodrigo Fornel assisted in formatting the figure. Janet Reid revised the English. Two referees provided useful comments. ASM received a research grant (476304/2007-5) and a research fellowship (302482/2008-3) from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luiz Ubiratan Hepp.

Additional information

Handling editor: Sonja Stendera

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hepp, L.U., Melo, A.S. Dissimilarity of stream insect assemblages: effects of multiple scales and spatial distances. Hydrobiologia 703, 239–246 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1367-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1367-7

Keywords

Navigation