Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Action Research as Signature Pedagogy in an Education Doctorate Program: The Reality and Hope

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debates about the education doctorate continue; and, while some individuals focus on the problematic, others work to distinguish this degree from the Ph.D. The author is part of the latter, and in this article I explain how faculty members at one university are using action research as a signature pedagogy to create stewards of practice, that is, school leaders who have the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to pinpoint educational problems, design solutions, and create effective change. A content analysis of action research dissertations was used to prove stewardship. I investigated the challenges that sparked students’ actions; the actions they took in response; and the benefits, if any, they gained from this experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, R., & Grogan, M. (2005). Form should follow function: Removing the Ed.D. dissertation from the Ph.D. straight jacket. UCEA Review, 46(2), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury Huang, H. (2007). What is good action research? Action Research, 8(1), 93–109. doi:10.1177/1476705310362435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2010). Working principles for the professional practice doctorate in education. College Park, MD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (2007). Comments on Shulman, Golde, Bueschel, and Garabedian: Existing practice is not the template. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 553–559. doi:10.3102/0013189X07313149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (2006). Signature pedagogies in doctoral education: Are they adaptable for the preparation of educational researchers? Educational Researcher, 36(6), 344–351. doi:10.3102/0013189X07308301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. (2007). Teaching/learning action research requires fundamental reforms in public higher education. Action Research, 5(3), 249–264. doi:10.1177/1476750307081016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, G. (2009). Improving schools through action research: A comprehensive guide for educators. Boston, MA: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchey, P. A. (2008). Action research primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project. Retrieved November 12, 2010, from www.edschools.org

  • Mills, G. E. (2010). Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Research (43rd Ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2005). Developing professionally anchored dissertations: Lessons from innovative programs. School Leadership Reviews, 1(1), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. A., & Imig, D. G. (2008, November/December). A stewardship of practice in education. Change, 42-48.

  • Pine, G. J. (2009). Teacher action research: Building knowledge democracies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of participatory action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (pp. 1–14). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2007). Practical wisdom in the service of professional practice. Educational Researcher, 36, 560–563. doi:10.3102/0013189X07313150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32. doi:10.3102/0013189X035003025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctorial education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debby Zambo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zambo, D. Action Research as Signature Pedagogy in an Education Doctorate Program: The Reality and Hope. Innov High Educ 36, 261–271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9171-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9171-7

Key words

Navigation