Abstract
Dull classroom environments, poor students’ attitudes and inhibited conceptual development led to the creation of an innovative mathematics program, the Class Banking System (CBS), which enables teachers to use constructivist ideas and approaches. To assess the effectiveness of the CBS, the Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire (ICEQ), Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES), Test of Mathematics-Related Attitudes (TOMRA), and concept map tests were administered to two groups of fifth-grade students as pretests and posttests over an academic year. To enrich the data collected from those questionnaires, three case studies (one for the experimental group and two for the control group) were undertaken based on observations and interviews of selected students. Relative to non-CBS students, CBS students experienced more favorable changes in terms of mathematics concept development, attitudes to mathematics, and perceived classroom environments on several dimensions of the CLES (e.g., Personal Relevance, Shared Control) and the ICEQ (e.g., Participation and Differentiation). Qualitative information based on classroom observations and student interviews reinforced and enriched the patterns of results obtained from the concept test and questionnaires.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J. & Huang, T.-C.I. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48–57.
Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J., Taylor, P.C. & Chen, C.C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37–55.
Anderson, G. & Arsenault, N. (1999). Fundamentals of educational research. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
Bishop, L. (1971). Individualizing educational systems. New York: Harper & Row.
Bryman, A. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research: Further reflections on their integration. In Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57–78). Aldershot, England: Avebury.
Cook, T.D. & Reichardt, C. (Eds.). (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Dryden, M. & Fraser, B. (1998, April). The impact of systemic reform efforts in promoting constructivist approaches in high school science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Duit, R., Treagust, D. & Mansfield, H. (1996). Investigating student understanding as a prerequisite to improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. In Treagust, Duit & Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 17–31). New York: Teachers College Press.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–159). New York: Macmillan.
Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative methods for research in science education. In Fraser & Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155–1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Felsine, J. (1983). Concept mapping: A method for detection of possible student misconceptions. In Helm & Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics (pp. 467–476). Ithaca, NY: Department of Education, Cornell University.
Fraser, B.J. (1981). Test of science related attitudes (TOSRA). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fraser, B.J. (1982). Development of short forms of several classroom environment scales. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 221–227.
Fraser, B.J. (1990). Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fraser, B.J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 193–541). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B.J. (1998a). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants. In Fraser & Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Fraser, B.J. (1998b). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.
Fraser, B.J. (1998c). The birth of a new journal: Editor’s introduction. Learning Environments Research, 1, 1–5.
Fraser, B.J. (1999). ‘Grain sizes’ in learning environments research: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In Waxman & Walberg (Eds.), New directions for teaching practice and research (pp. 285–296). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Fraser, B.J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In Goh & Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.
Fraser, B.J. & Fisher, D.L. (1983). Development and validation of short forms of some instruments measuring student perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment. Science Education, 67, 115–131.
Fraser, B.J. & Tobin, K. (1991). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in classroom environment research. In Fraser & Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 271–275). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Goh, S.C. & Khine, M.S. (Eds.). (2002). Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective. Singapore: World Scientific.
Goh, S.C., Young, D.J. & Fraser, B.J. (1995). Psychosocial climate and student outcomes in elementary mathematics classrooms: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 29–40.
Goode, W.J. & Hatt, P.K. (1952). The case study. In Goode & Hatt (Eds.), Methods of social research (pp. 330–340). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hand, B. (1996). Diagnosis of teachers’ knowledge bases and teaching roles when implementing constructivist teaching/learning approaches. In Treagust, Duit & Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 212–220). New York: Teachers College Press.
Holland, B.S. & Copenhaver, M. (1988). Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 145–149.
Howe, K.R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis: Or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(11), 10–16.
Jaccard, J. & Wan, C.K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Kim, H.B., Fisher, D.L. & Fraser, B.J. (1999). Assessment and investigation of constructivist science learning environments. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17, 239–249.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw.
Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.D. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Majeed, A., Fraser, B.J. & Aldridge, J. (2002). Learning environment and its associations with student satisfaction among mathematics students in Brunei Darussalam. Learning Environments Research, 5, 203–226.
Maor, D. & Fraser, B.J. (1996). Use of classroom environment perceptions in evaluating inquiry-based computer assisted learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 401–421.
Marshall, H.H. (1990). Observing teachers’ knowledge bases and teaching roles. In Treagust, Duit & Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 212–220). New York: Teachers College Press.
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (Eds.). (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moos, R.H. (1974). The Social Climate Scales: An overview. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
Mullholland, J. & Wallace, J. (2000, April). Restorying and the legitimation of research texts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Novak, J.D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937–949.
Novak, J.D. (1991). Clarify with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 58(7), 45–49.
Stern, G.G. (1970). People in context: Measuring person–environment congruence in education and industry. New York: Wiley.
Taylor, P.C., Dawson, V. & Fraser, B.J. (1995, April). Classroom learning environments under transformation: A constructivist perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Taylor, P.C. & Fraser, B.J. (1991, April). Development of an instrument for assessing constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Taylor, P.C., Fraser, B.J. & Fisher, D.L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302.
Teh, G. & Fraser, B. (1994). An evaluation of computer-assisted learning in terms of achievement, attitudes and classroom environment. Evaluation and Research in Education, 8, 147–161.
Thompson, B. (1998a). Review of “what if there were no significance tests?” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 334–346.
Thompson, B. (1998b, April). Five methodology errors in educational research: The pantheon of statistical significance and other faux pas. Invited address presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Tobin, K. & Fraser, B.J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In Fraser & Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Treagust, D.F., Duit, R. & Fraser, B.J. (Eds.). (1996). Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.
Walberg, H.J. (Ed.) (1979). Educational environments and effects: Evaluation, policy and productivity. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Walberg, H.J. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In Farley & Gordon (Eds.), Psychology and education: The state of the union (pp. 81–108). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Walberg, H.J. & Anderson, G.J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spinner, H., Fraser, B.J. Evaluation of an Innovative Mathematics Program in Terms of Classroom Environment, Student Attitudes, and Conceptual Development. Int J Sci Math Educ 3, 267–293 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-6531-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-6531-8