Skip to main content
Log in

Force Transmission Errors in Magnetic Suspension Densimeters

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Techniques to determine and compensate for the force transmission error (FTE), including the magnetic effects of the fluid being measured, in magnetic suspension densimeters are presented. For a two-sinker densimeter, the forces on the balance are expressed for each of the weighings comprising a density determination (i.e., the two sinkers plus balance calibration and tare weights). This yields a system of four equations, which are solved for the fluid density, a balance calibration factor, a coupling factor (related to the FTE), and a quantity related to the balance tare. For a single-sinker densimeter, an in situ weighing of the sinker in vacuum compensates for the FTE of the apparatus itself. A determination of the fluid-specific effect requires measurements with two different sinkers—analogous to the two-sinker analysis, but with the measurements spread out over time. The apparatus part of the FTE is generally less than ±20 ppm. Measurements on propane, helium, neon, nitrogen, argon, toluene, and air are analyzed for the fluid-specific effect; this effect is correlated with the magnetic susceptibility of the fluid together with an apparatus constant. With this analysis, the force transmission “error” becomes an effect that can be accounted for rather than a significant source of uncertainty in density measurements carried out with magnetic suspension densimeters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagner W., Kleinrahm R. (2004). Metrologia 41:S24

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. W. Lösch, Entwicklung und Aufbau von neuen Magnetschwebewaagen zur berührungsfreien Messung vertikaler Kräfte, Fortschr.-Ber. VDI, Reihe 3, No. 138 (VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, 1987).

  3. Kuramoto N., Fujii K., Waseda A. (2004). Metrologia 41:S84

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Kleinrahm and W. Wagner, Entwicklung und Aufbau einer Dichtemeßanlage zur Messung der Siede- und Taudichten reiner fluider Stoffe auf der gesamten Phasengrenzkurve, Fortschr.-Ber. VDI, Reihe 3, No. 92 (VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, 1984).

  5. Kleinrahm R., Wagner W. (1986). J. Chem. Thermodyn. 18:739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lösch H.W., Kleinrahm R., Wagner W. (1994). Chem.-Ing.-Tech. 66:1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McLinden M.O., Lösch-Will C. (2007). J. Chem. Thermo. 39:507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. O. McLinden, submitted to J. Chem. Eng. Data.

  9. D. R. Lide, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85th Ed., (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2004).

  10. M. O. McLinden, unpublished data, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A. (2006).

  11. Davis R.S. (1998). Metrologia 35:49

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. McLinden M.O. (2006). Meas. Sci. Technol. 17:2597

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beams J.W., Clarke A.M. (1962). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 33:750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Brachthäuser, R. Kleinrahm, H. W. Lösch, and W. Wagner, Entwicklung eines neuen Dichtemeßverfahrens und Aufbau einer Hochtemperatur-Hochdruck-Dichtemeßanlage, Fortschr.-Ber. VDI, Reihe 8, No. 371 (VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, 1993).

  15. Wagner W., de Reuck K.M. (1987). International Thermodynamic Tables of the Fluid State—9, Oxygen. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Span R., Lemmon E.W., Jacobsen R.T., Wagner W., Yokozeki A. (2000). J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 29:1361

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Klimeck, Weiterentwicklung einer Ein-Senkkörper-Dichtemessanlage und Präzisionsmessungen der thermischen Zustandsgrößen von Kohlendioxid, Argon, Stickstoff und Methan, (Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany, 1997).

  18. Richter M., Sommer D., Kleinrahm R. (2007). personal communication, Lehrstuhl für Thermodynamik. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. O. McLinden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLinden, M.O., Kleinrahm, R. & Wagner, W. Force Transmission Errors in Magnetic Suspension Densimeters. Int J Thermophys 28, 429–448 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-007-0176-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-007-0176-0

Keywords

Navigation