Abstract
This paper presents a novel quantum private comparision (QPC) protocol based on the single-qubit rotations, quantum SWAP-test and quantum SWAP gates. The proposed QPC protocol can secretly compare information of the two participants without the help of a third party (TP). The security analysis of the presented QPC protocol shows that it is quantum indistinguishable and information theory security for all outside attackers and inside attackers. Finally, we compare some important features of the presented QPC protocol with other QPC protocols. The results show that the proposed protocol has some advantages different from previous protocols.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xu, T.T., Li, Z.H., Bai, C.M., et al.: A new improving quantum secret sharing scheme. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 1–10 (2017)
Bai, C.M., Li, Z.H., Xu, T.T., et al.: Quantum secret sharing using the d-dimensional GHZ state. Quantum Inf. Process. 16(3), 59 (2017)
Zhang, W., Ding, D.S., Sheng, Y.B., et al.: Quantum secure direct communication with quantum memory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(22), 220501 (2017)
He, Y.F., Ma, W.P.: Three-party quantum secure direct communication against collective noise. Quantum Inf. Process. 16(10), 252 (2017)
Wu, W.Q., Cai, Q.Y., Zhang, H.G., et al.: Quantum Public key cryptosystem based on bell sates. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56(11), 3431–3440 (2017)
Wu, W.Q., Cai, Q.Y., Zhang, H.G., et al.: Bit-oriented quantum public-key cryptosystem based on bell states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57(12), 1–11 (2018)
Yang, Y.G., Cao W.F., Wen Q.Y.: Secure quantum private comparison. Physica Scripta 80(6), 065002 (2009)
Ye, T.Y., Ji, Z.X.: Two-party quantum private comparison with five-qubit entangled states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56(5), 1517–1529 (2017)
Pan, H.M.: Quantum private comparison based on x-type entangled states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56(10), 3340–3347 (2017)
Ji, Z.X., Ye, T.Y.: Multi-party quantum private comparison based on the entanglement swapping of d-level cat states and d-level Bell states. Quantum Inf. Process. 16(7), 177 (2017)
Xu, L., Zhao, Z.: A robust and efficient quantum private comparison of equality based on the entangled swapping of GHZ-like state and χ+ state. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56(8), 2671–2685 (2017)
Xu, L., Zhao, Z.: Quantum private comparison protocol based on the entanglement swapping between (χ+) state and W-Class state. Quantum Inf. Process. 16(12), 302 (2017)
Zhou, M.K.: Improvements of quantum private comparison protocol based on cluster states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2, 1–6 (2017)
Wu, W.Q., Cai, Q.Y., Wu, S.M., et al.: Cryptanalysis and improvement of Ye others’s quantum private comparison protocol. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2019, 1–7 (2019)
Hung, S.M., Hwang, S.L., Hwang, T., et al.: Multiparty quantum private comparison with almost dishonest third parties for strangers. Quantum Inf. Process. 16(2), 36 (2017)
Wu, W.Q., Cai, Q.Y., Wu, S.M., et al.: Cryptanalysis of He’s quantum private comparison protocol and a new protocol. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 17(3), 1950026 (2019)
Lin, J., Yang, C.W., Hwang, T.: Quantum private comparison of equality protocol without a third party. Quantum Inf. Process. 13(2), 157 (2013)
He, G.P.: Quantum private comparison protocol without a third party. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 15(2), 1750014 (2016)
He, G.P.: Device-independent quantum private comparison protocol without a third party. arXiv:1710.05051
Chuang, I.L.: Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Gockenbach, M.S.: Finite-dimensional linear algebra. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)
Acknowledgments
The authors are supported by the Natural Science Foundation of HeBei Province Nos. F2017201199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, W., Zhou, G., Zhao, Y. et al. New Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Without a Third Party. Int J Theor Phys 59, 1866–1875 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04454-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04454-9