nach oben

Information Systems Frontiers

Erschienen in:

18.12.2018

Investigating Users’ Tagging Behavior in Online Academic Community Based on Growth Model: Difference between Active and Inactive Users

verfasst von: Yunhong Xu, Dehu Yin, Duanning Zhou

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

With the development of social interaction techniques and social tagging mechanisms, online academic community as a new platform has greatly changed the way users organize and share knowledge. The large amount of social tagging data occurred on online academic community provides us a channel to systematically understand users’ tagging behavior. Based on data collected from a specific online academic community, this research first classifies users into two categories: active and inactive users. After that, growth models (damped exponential model, normal model and fluctuating model) are employed to investigate tagging behavior for both active and inactive users. Factors that might influence the likelihood of the growth models are also identified based on multinomial logistic regression. This research expands our understanding on users’ tagging behavior and factors that may affect their tagging behavior in the context of online academic community.

Vorheriger Artikel Social Media for Nowcasting Flu Activity: Spatio-Temporal Big Data Analysis

Nächster Artikel Self-Reported and Computer-Recorded Experience in Mobile Banking: a Multi-Phase Path Analytic Approach

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Cattuto, C. (2006). Semiotic dynamics in online social communities. European Physical Journal C-Particles and Fields, 46, 33–37.

Cattuto, C., Baldassarri, A., Servedio, V. D. P., & Loreto, V. (2007). "Vocabulary growth in collaborative tagging systems". arXiv preprint arXiv:0704.3316.

Chen, Y.-N., & Ke, H.-R. (2013). An analysis of users' behavior patterns in the organization of information: A case study of CiteULike. Online Information Review, 37(4), 638–656.CrossRef

Choi, Y., & Syn, S. Y. (2016). Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1089–1104.CrossRef

Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Rajala, R. (2018). Why do young people tag photos on social networking sites?. Explaining user intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 117–127.CrossRef

Farooq, U., Kannampallil, T. G., Song, Y., Ganoe, C. H., Carroll, J. M., & Giles, L. (2007). Evaluating tagging behavior in social bookmarking systems: Metrics and design heuristics. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work (pp. 351–360).CrossRef

Figueiredo, F., Pinto, H., BeléM, F., Almeida, J., GonçAlves, M., Fernandes, D., & Moura, E. (2013). Assessing the quality of textual features in social media. Information Processing & Management, 49(1), 222–247.CrossRef

Golbeck, J., Koepfler, J., & Emmerling, B. (2011). An experimental study of social tagging behavior and image content. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1750–1760.

Golder, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2005). The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2).

Gupta, M., Li, R., Yin, Z., & Han, J. (2011). An overview of social tagging and applications. In C. Aggarwal (Ed.), Social network data analytics. Boston: Springer.

Halpin, H., Robu, V., & Shepherd, H. (2007). The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 211–220). ACM.

Hammond, T.,Lund, B., Flack, M., Hannay, T., & NeoReality, I. (2005). "Social bookmarking tools (II)". D-Lib magazine, Vol.11 No.4, pp.1082–9873.

Huang, C. L., Yeh, P. H., Lin, C. W., & Wu, D. C. (2014). Utilizing user tag-based interests in recommender systems for social resource sharing websites. Knowledge-Based Systems, 56, 86–96.CrossRef

Klašnja-Milićević, A., Ivanović, M., Vesin, B., & Budimac, Z. (2018). Enhancing e-learning systems with personalized recommendation based on collaborative tagging techniques. Applied Intelligence, 48(6), 1519–1535.CrossRef

Lee, C. (2018). Introduction: Discourse of social tagging (Vol. 22, pp. 1–3). Discourse context & Media.

Lee, T. Q., Yeh, C. W., & Fang, C. C. (2014). Bayesian software reliability prediction based on Yamada delayed S-shaped model. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 490-491, 1267–1278.CrossRef

Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. (2011). Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 91(2), 461–471.CrossRef

Lin, Y. l., Trattner, C., Brusilovsky, P., & He, D. (2015). The impact of image descriptions on user tagging behavior: A study of the nature and functionality of crowdsourced tags. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1785–1798.CrossRef

Ma, J. (2012). The sustainability and stabilization of tag vocabulary in CiteULike: An empirical study of collaborative tagging. Online Information Review, 36(5), 655–674.CrossRef

Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., & Davis, M. (2006). "’". Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp.31–40.

Mezghani, M., Peninou, A., Zayani, C. A., Amous, I., & Sedes, F. (2017). Producing relevant interests from social networks by mining users' tagging behaviour: A first step towards adapting social information. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 108, 15–29.CrossRef

Montañés, E., Ramón Quevedo, J., Díaz, I., Cortina, R., Alonso, P., & Ranilla, J. (2010). TagRanker: Learning to recommend ranked tags. Logic Journal of IGPL, 19(2), 395–404.CrossRef

Pan, X., He, S., Zhu, X., & Fu, Q. (2016). How users employ various popular tags to annotate resources in social tagging: An empirical study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1121–1137.CrossRef

Pitsilis, G., & Wang, W. (2015). Harnessing the power of social bookmarking for improving tag-based recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 239–251.CrossRef

Redden, C. S. (2010). Social bookmarking in academic libraries: Trends and applications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 219–227.CrossRef

Robu, V., Halpin, H., & Shepherd, H. (2009). Emergence of consensus and shared vocabularies in collaborative tagging systems. ACM Transactions on the Web, 3(4), 1–34.CrossRef

Sa, N., & Yuan, X. (2013). What motivates people use social tagging. In In international conference on online communities and social Computing (pp. 86–93).CrossRef

Santos-Neto, E., Condon, D., Andrade, N., Iamnitchi, A., & Ripeanu, M. (2013). "Reuse, temporal dynamics, interest sharing, and collaboration in social tagging systems". arXiv preprint arXiv, Vol.13 No.01, pp.61–91.

Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42, 425–440.CrossRef

Sun, X., & Lin, H. (2013). Topical community detection from mining user tagging behavior and interest. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 321–333.

Wang, Y., Wang, S., Tang, J., Qi, G. J., Liu, H., & Li, B. (2017). CLARE: A joint approach to label classification and tag recommendation. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 210–216.

Wei J., Zhao, D., & Liang L. (2009). Estimating the growth models of news stories on disasters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1741–1755.

Wladis, C., Conway, K., & Hachey, A. C. (2017). Using course-level factors as predictors of online course outcomes: A multi-level analysis at a US urban community college. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 184–200.CrossRef

Wu, L. F. (2011). The accelerating growth of online tagging systems. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 83(2), 283–287.CrossRef

Xia, Z., Wang, X., Sun, X., & Wang, Q. (2016). A secure and dynamic multi-keyword ranked search scheme over encrypted cloud data. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 27(2), 340–352.CrossRef

Xu, C., Ma, B., Chen, X., & Ma, F. (2013). Social tagging in the scholarly world. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(10), 2045–2057.

Yuan, K., Bo, F., & Zhang, W. (2016). Semi-varying coefficient multinomial logistic regression for disease progression risk prediction. Statistics in Medicine, 35(26), 4764–4778.

Zhang, Y., Zhang, B., Gao, K., Guo, P., & Sun, D. (2012). Combining content and relation analysis for recommendation in social tagging systems. Physical A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(22), 5759–5768.CrossRef

Zhou, D., Bian, J., Zheng, S., Zha, H., & Giles, C. L. (2008, April). Exploring social annotations for information retrieval. In In proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (Vol. 715-724).

Titel: Investigating Users’ Tagging Behavior in Online Academic Community Based on Growth Model: Difference between Active and Inactive Users
verfasst von: Yunhong Xu
Dehu Yin
Duanning Zhou
Publikationsdatum: 18.12.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9891-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

The Economic Value of Online User Reviews with Ad Spending on Movie Box-Office Sales

Investigating the diffusion of IT consumerization in the workplace: A case study using social network analysis

Social Media for Nowcasting Flu Activity: Spatio-Temporal Big Data Analysis

Digital Occupational Health Systems: What Do Employees Think about it?

Erratum to: Online knowledge sharing mechanisms: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research

Leveraging Data Analytics for Behavioral Research